Literature DB >> 23849625

Fluticasone/formoterol dry powder versus budesonide/formoterol in adults and adolescents with uncontrolled or partly controlled asthma.

A Cukier1, C M A Jacob, N A Rosario Filho, J Fiterman, E O Vianna, J L Hetzel, M A Neis, E Fiss, F F M Castro, A L G Fernandes, R Stirbulov, E Pizzichini.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This 12-week study compared the efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of fluticasone propionate plus formoterol (FL/F) 250/12 μg b.i.d. administered via a dry powder inhaler (DPI) (Libbs Farmacêutica, Brazil) to a combination of budesonide plus formoterol (BD/F) 400/12 μg b.i.d. After a 2-week run-in period (in which all patients were treated exclusively with budesonide plus formoterol), patients aged 12-65 years of age (N = 196) with uncontrolled asthma were randomized into an actively-controlled, open-labeled, parallel-group, multicentre, phase III study. The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority, measured by morning peak expiratory flow (mPEF). The non-inferiority was demonstrated. A statistically significant improvement from baseline was observed in both groups in terms of lung function, asthma control, and the use of rescue medication. FL/F demonstrated a statistical superiority to BD/F in terms of lung function (FEV(1)) (p = 0.01) and for asthma control (p = 0.02). Non-significant between-group differences were observed with regards to exacerbation rates and adverse events. In uncontrolled or partly controlled asthma patients, the use of a combination of fluticasone propionate plus formoterol via DPI for 12-weeks was non-inferior and showed improvements in FEV(1) and asthma control when compared to a combination of budesonide plus formoterol. ( CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ISRCTN60408425).
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asthma control questionnaire; Clinical trial; Forced expiratory volume in 1 s; Morning peak expiratory flow; Non-inferiority; Single inhaler

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23849625     DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Med        ISSN: 0954-6111            Impact factor:   3.415


  2 in total

1.  An example of using a decision making framework designed for non-medical prescribers as a method for enhancing prescribing safety for inhaled corticosteroids (ICS).

Authors:  Saja Almarshad
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Clinical utility and development of the fluticasone/formoterol combination formulation (Flutiform(®)) for the treatment of asthma.

Authors:  Ricardo Antonio Tan; Jonathan Corren
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.162

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.