Literature DB >> 23849486

Osteoporotic Fracture Program management: who should be in charge? A comparative survey of knowledge in orthopaedic surgeons and internists.

R Sorbi1, M Aghamirsalim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis has been described as a progressive skeletal disorder until a patient experiences a fragility fracture. The number of patients with osteoporotic fractures is increasing at an exponential rate. Orthopaedic surgeons, most of the time, first clinicians seen by patients at the time of fracture, do not routinely consider osteoporosis management. Therefore, we compared the knowledge of orthopaedic surgeons and internists regarding medical treatment required: which group would have more abilities to keep patients with osteoporotic fractures under management? HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that internists may have more abilities to assess and treat osteoporosis for patients with osteoporotic fractures; therefore, referring these patients to this specialized team for post-fracture medical consultation is required.
METHODS: A questionnaire composed of seven closed questions was administered to 4700 orthopaedic surgeons and internists. This question list addressed the orthopaedic surgeons' and internists' knowledge in managing patients with osteoporotic fractures. The questions were designed in a way to cover the topics of diagnosis, treatment, and approach to an osteoporotic patient with osteoporotic fractures.
RESULTS: In this survey, 3431 respondents were included. Only 118 (fewer than 10%) orthopaedic surgeons would order bone mineral densitometry (BMD) in osteoporotic fractures in contrast to 1544 (79%) internists. Approximately 1485 (76%) internists against 487 (33%) orthopaedic surgeons prescribe proper dosage of calcium and vitamin D.
CONCLUSION: Typical orthopaedic surgeon is not naturally inclined to manage patients with osteoporotic fractures. The existing management gap between the occurrence of an osteoporotic fracture and the identification and treatment of osteoporosis requires multifaceted intervention. Improved communication between orthopaedic surgeons and internists may reduce this gap between fracture occurrence and osteoporosis management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III prospective diagnostic study.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fragility fracture; Internist; Orthopaedic surgeon; Osteoporosis; Osteoporotic fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23849486     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  4 in total

Review 1.  Vertebral Fracture Identification as Part of a Comprehensive Risk Assessment in Patients with Osteoporosis.

Authors:  John T Schousboe
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 2.  Clinical Management of Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  Adam Z Khan; Richard D Rames; Anna N Miller
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  The Adequacy of Diagnosis and Treatment for Osteoporosis in Patients with Proximal Humeral Fractures.

Authors:  Tae In Kim; Jun Ha Choi; Sae Hoon Kim; Joo Han Oh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-08-10

4.  Epidemiology of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and management of associated fracture risk in Japan.

Authors:  Satoshi Soen; Miki Kaku; Naoki Okubo; Salsabil Touzeni; Kengo Saito; Makiko Kobayashi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.626

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.