| Literature DB >> 23849139 |
Venus Welch-White1, Norma Dawkins, Thomas Graham, Ralphenia Pace.
Abstract
The association of adverse health with high fat intake has long been recognized. However, the lack of research focusing on the interrelationship of thyroid and liver function, and the pathogenesis of a high fat diet leaves these topics poorly understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the physiological changes in euthyroid and thyroid altered animal model fed saturated and unsaturated high fat diets. To achieve this objective adult male Sprague Dawley rats (n = 100) were fed one of five diets; a control or one of four test diets containing 25% saturated or unsaturated, and 37% saturated or unsaturated fats for a period of eight weeks. Each experimental group consisted of ten euthyroid and ten thyroid altered animals. An altered thyroid state was chemically induced with the addition of 0.05% propylthiouracil (PTU) in the drinking water. Euthyroid animals fed high fat diets increased in body weights and body lengths, compared to thyroid altered animals (P < 0.05). Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and asparte aminotransferase (AST) levels increased across all experimental groups. HbA1C values and urinary glucose values were within normal range for all animals. Liver morphology showed increased hepatic stellate (ito) and vacuole cells in thyroid altered animals. These findings suggest that altered thyroid status negatively impacts growth and weight gain, and simultaneously affected lipid metabolism, resulting in abnormal liver morphology.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23849139 PMCID: PMC3733864 DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-12-100
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Final body weights (g) of euthyroid and thyroid altered animals (n = 100)
| 120.68 ± 7.15 | 348.41 ± 22.06 a | 121.64 ± 5.18 | 316.39 ± 17.50 b | |
| 119.28 ± 4.70 | 375.42 ± 13.28 ac | 119.23 ± 5.78 | 319.31 ± 17.90 b | |
| 124.92 ± 7.15 | 390.52 ± 29.99 ad | 119.57 ± 6.46 | 308.48 ± 38.29 b | |
| 118.85 ± 6.71 | 388.07 ± 20.27 ac | 123.83 ± 8.43 | 322.48 ± 15.65 b | |
| 121.21 ± 7.02 | 396.43 ± 21.29 ad | 123.13 ± 5.72 | 320.91 ± 24.17 b | |
*Means ± SD.
a, b Values within row with different superscript differ at P < 0.05.
c, d Values within column with different superscript at P < 0.05.
Final body lengths (cm) of euthyroid and thyroid altered animals
| 43.00 ± 1.52 b | 40.72 ± 0.98 c | |
| 43.78 ± 0.72 ab | 40.29 ± 1.62 c | |
| 44.26 ± 0.93 a | 41.06 ± 1.12 c | |
| 44.48 ± 0.80 a | 40.70 ± 1.84 c | |
| 44.64 ± 0.70 a | 40.67 ± 0.84 c | |
*Means ± SD.
a, b, c Values across rows and within columns with difference superscript differ at P < 0.05.
Average feed consumption (g) of euthyroid and thyroid altered animals n = 100
| 1448 ± 21.75 a | 1266 ± 72.15 b | |
| 1431 ± 4.92 a | 1138 ± 55.03 c | |
| 1428 ± 13.26 a | 1190 ± 89.15 c | |
| 1419 ± 10.77 a | 1126 ± 40.34 c | |
| 1410 ± 19.20 a | 1119 ± 53.15 c | |
*Means ± SD.
a, b, c Values within rows and columns with difference superscript differ at P < 0.05.
T3 values in euthyroid and thyroid altered animals
| 3.05 ± 1.49 cd | 4.6 ± 1.59 ab | |
| 5.74 ± 0.93 a | 4.02 ± 1.70 bc | |
| 0.84 ± 0.59 e | 1.78 ± 1.01 de | |
| 0.95 ± 0.91 e | 1.68 ± 1.13 de | |
| 1.68 ± 1.14 de | 2.52 ± 1.32 d | |
*Means ± SD.
a, b, c, d, e Values across rows and within columns with different superscript differ at P < 0.05.
Lipid profile of euthyroid and thyroid altered animals (n = 100)
| 87.2 ± 20.56 a | 53.4 ± 16.89 ab | 60.7 ± 15.11 a | 45.9 ± 20.57 ab | 92.3 ± 13.56 a | 57.1 ±18.15 ab | 54.6 ± 10.36 a | 57.5 ± 33.03 a | |
| 90.9 ± 21.54 a | 72.1 ± 17.71 a | 57.8 ± 10.10 a | 40.1 ± 15.54 abc | 93.0 ± 24.99 a | 56.4 ± 34.69 ab | 61.1 ± 11.59 a | 48.8 ± 25.85 abc | |
| 90.2 ± 13.24 a | 50.2 ± 9.78 b | 50.5 ± 11.64 a | 29.9 ± 15.82 bc | 88 ± 5.25 a | 56.0 ± 13.71 ab | 54.9 ± 16.61 a | 24.2 ± 6.51 c | |
| 84.3 ± 8.67 a | 54.3 ± 14.71a b | 58 ± 15.25 a | 21.8 ± 11.65 c | 89.4 ± 7.72 a | 47.2 ± 21.81b ab | 65.2 ± 30.37 a | 35.6 ± 14.53 bc | |
| 88.6 ± 14.89 a | 39.9 ± 7.99 b | 57.8 ± 22.08 a | 37.2 ± 9.31 bc | 89.6 ± 13.21 a | 40.6 ± 16.49 b | 51.9 ± 19.28 a | 38.6 ± 19.23 abc | |
*Means ± SD.
a, b Total Cholesterol values across rows and within columns with difference superscript differ at P < 0.05.
a, b HDL values across rows and within columns with difference superscript differ at P < 0.05.
a, b TG values across rows and within columns with difference superscript differ at P < 0.05.
a, b, c LDL values across rows and within columns with difference superscript differ at P < 0.05.
ALT and AST serum values in euthyroid and thyroid altered animals (n = 100)
| 43.3 ± 24.73 ab | 38.5 ± 38.50 b | 151.6 ± 85.46 a | 94.4 ± 47.99 a | |
| 46.9 ± 13.20 ab | 39.4 ± 5.70 ba | 115.1 ± 69.18 a | 112.3 ± 47.81 a | |
| 51.5 ± 11.30 ab | 46.9 ± 18.82 ba | 148.7 ± 96.39 a | 153.9 ± 102.30 a | |
| 46.7 ± 9.06 a | 48.11 ± 14.89 ba | 128.6 ± 65.53 a | 149.8 ± 105.54 a | |
| 53.8 ± 12.72 a | 48.4 ± 10.84 ba | 143.9 ± 88.59 a | 121.7 ± 62.99 a | |
*Means of Average Reading Values.
a, b ALT Values across rows within columns with difference superscript differ at P < 0.05.
a AST Values across rows and within columns with difference superscript differ at P < 0.05.
Summary incidence of abnormal histopathological liver changesin euthyroid and thyroid altered animals
| 0% | 20% | 20% | 80% | |
| 0% | 30% | 50% | 70% | |
| 20% | 30% | 60% | 80% | |
| 10% | 0% | 50% | 80% | |
| 0% | 20% | 30% | 60% | |
Figure 1Histopathological evaluation of liver in Rats fed Lard Based Diets. (A) Represents a normal liver with normal morphology from a euthyroid animal which consumed a control diet. (B) Represents a normal liver with normal morphology from a thyroid altered animal which consumed a control diet. (C) Represents a normal liver in a euthyroid animal with normal morphology, which consumed a 25% lard diet. (D) Shows liver from a thyroid altered animal which consumed 25% lard diet. There is evidence of +1 ito cells and a hepatocyte with the presence of two small cytoplasmic vacuoles. (E) Represents the liver from a euthyroid animal which consumed 37% lard diet that shows the presence of 3 ito cells (+4) and multiple vacuoles (+3). (F) Represents the liver from a thyroid altered animal which consumed 37% lard diet that shows the Presence of ito cells (+4) and vacuoles (+2).
Figure 2Histopathological evaluation of liver in Rats fed Soy Oil Diets. (A) Represents a normal liver with normal morphology from a euthyroid animal which consumed a control diet. (B) Represents a normal liver with normal morphology from a thyroid altered animal which consumed a control diet. (C) Represents a liver in a euthyroid animal which consumed a 25% soy diet and shows the presence of 2 ito cells, with a grade of (+2). (D) Shows liver from a thyroid altered animal which consumed 25% soy diet and displays the presence of 2 ito cells (+2). (E) Represents the liver from a euthyroid animal which consumed 37% soy diet and displays the presence of ito cells (+3) and vacuoles (+2). (F) Represents the liver from a thyroid altered animal which consumed 37% soy diet that shows the displays the presence of 1 ito cells (+2) and small vacuoles (+4).
Figure 3Experimental groups and test diets. Five of the experimental groups were comprised of normal or euthyroid rats, and the remaining five experimental groups contained thyroid altered animals. Each diet of the five diets were fed to a normal (euthyroid) group as well as a thyroid altered group. Saturated fat diets contain lard as the fat source, while unsaturated diets contain soy oil.