Literature DB >> 23848604

How species richness and total abundance constrain the distribution of abundance.

Kenneth J Locey1, Ethan P White.   

Abstract

The species abundance distribution (SAD) is one of the most intensively studied distributions in ecology and its hollow-curve shape is one of ecology's most general patterns. We examine the SAD in the context of all possible forms having the same richness (S) and total abundance (N), i.e. the feasible set. We find that feasible sets are dominated by similarly shaped hollow curves, most of which are highly correlated with empirical SADs (most R(2) values > 75%), revealing a strong influence of N and S on the form of the SAD and an a priori explanation for the ubiquitous hollow curve. Empirical SADs are often more hollow and less variable than the majority of the feasible set, revealing exceptional unevenness and relatively low natural variability among ecological communities. We discuss the importance of the feasible set in understanding how general constraints determine observable variation and influence the forms of predicted and empirical patterns.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MaxEnt; constraints; distribution of wealth; feasible set; hollow curve; macroecology; species abundance distribution

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23848604     DOI: 10.1111/ele.12154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  10 in total

1.  Scaling laws predict global microbial diversity.

Authors:  Kenneth J Locey; Jay T Lennon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Biological and statistical processes jointly drive population aggregation: using host-parasite interactions to understand Taylor's power law.

Authors:  Pieter T J Johnson; Mark Q Wilber
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The control of rank-abundance distributions by a competitive despotic species.

Authors:  Ralph Mac Nally; Clive A McAlpine; Hugh P Possingham; Martine Maron
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  An extensive comparison of species-abundance distribution models.

Authors:  Elita Baldridge; David J Harris; Xiao Xiao; Ethan P White
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Environmental drivers and spatial scaling of species abundance distributions in Palaearctic grassland vegetation.

Authors:  Werner Ulrich; Thomas J Matthews; Idoia Biurrun; Juan Antonio Campos; Patryk Czortek; Iwona Dembicz; Franz Essl; Goffredo Filibeck; Gian-Pietro Giusso Del Galdo; Behlül Güler; Alireza Naqinezhad; Péter Török; Jürgen Dengler
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 6.431

6.  Environmental correlates of species rank - abundance distributions in global drylands.

Authors:  Werner Ulrich; Santiago Soliveres; Andrew D Thomas; Andrew J Dougill; Fernando T Maestre
Journal:  Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.634

7.  Testing the Neutral Theory of Biodiversity with Human Microbiome Datasets.

Authors:  Lianwei Li; Zhanshan Sam Ma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Ecological response hides behind the species abundance distribution: Community response to low-intensity disturbance in managed grasslands.

Authors:  Atte Komonen; Merja Elo
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  A majority of HIV persistence during antiretroviral therapy is due to infected cell proliferation.

Authors:  Daniel B Reeves; Elizabeth R Duke; Thor A Wagner; Sarah E Palmer; Adam M Spivak; Joshua T Schiffer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 17.694

10.  An interactive tool to forecast US hospital needs in the coronavirus 2019 pandemic.

Authors:  Kenneth J Locey; Thomas A Webb; Jawad Khan; Anuja K Antony; Bala Hota
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2020-11-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.