G Gourcerol1, Y Benanni, E Boueyre, A M Leroi, P Ducrotte. 1. Nutrition, Gut & Brain Unit (INSERM U1073), Institute for Biomedical Research and innovation, Rouen University, Rouen, France; Department of Physiology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The involvement of delayed gastric emptying (GE) in the pathophysiology of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains debated and has been to date only assessed using esophageal pH-metry that only detects acidic reflux. We therefore investigated whether delay in GE could impact on liquid, mixed, and gas reflux detected using combined esophageal pH-impedance recording. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients were explored with GE and esophageal pH-impedance measurement in the workup of typical symptoms of GERD. Gastric emptying was assessed using the (13) C-octanoic acid breath test and an ambulatory esophageal pH-impedance recording was performed off proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for 24 h. KEY RESULTS: Gastric emptying was normal in 17 patients and delayed in 13 patients. Delay in GE increased the daily number of liquid/mixed reflux events detected by combined esophageal pH-impedance monitoring, but had no effect of esophageal acid exposure or gas reflux. This translated in increased number of postprandial reflux events, with a longer bolus clearance time and increased esophageal proximal extension. In patient with delayed GE, symptomatic reflux had a higher proximal extension and a longer bolus clearance time compared to symptomatic reflux events from patients with normal GE. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Delay in GE increases daily and postprandial liquid/mixed reflux events. Reflux characteristics differently trigger symptoms in patients with normal and delayed GE, and may impact on the therapeutic strategy.
BACKGROUND: The involvement of delayed gastric emptying (GE) in the pathophysiology of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains debated and has been to date only assessed using esophageal pH-metry that only detects acidic reflux. We therefore investigated whether delay in GE could impact on liquid, mixed, and gas reflux detected using combined esophageal pH-impedance recording. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients were explored with GE and esophageal pH-impedance measurement in the workup of typical symptoms of GERD. Gastric emptying was assessed using the (13) C-octanoic acid breath test and an ambulatory esophageal pH-impedance recording was performed off proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for 24 h. KEY RESULTS: Gastric emptying was normal in 17 patients and delayed in 13 patients. Delay in GE increased the daily number of liquid/mixed reflux events detected by combined esophageal pH-impedance monitoring, but had no effect of esophageal acid exposure or gas reflux. This translated in increased number of postprandial reflux events, with a longer bolus clearance time and increased esophageal proximal extension. In patient with delayed GE, symptomatic reflux had a higher proximal extension and a longer bolus clearance time compared to symptomatic reflux events from patients with normal GE. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Delay in GE increases daily and postprandial liquid/mixed reflux events. Reflux characteristics differently trigger symptoms in patients with normal and delayed GE, and may impact on the therapeutic strategy.
Authors: Pankaj J Pasricha; Katherine P Yates; Linda Nguyen; John Clarke; Thomas L Abell; Gianrico Farrugia; William L Hasler; Kenneth L Koch; William J Snape; Richard W McCallum; Irene Sarosiek; James Tonascia; Laura A Miriel; Linda Lee; Frank Hamilton; Henry P Parkman Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: S van Rijn; N F Rinsma; M Y A van Herwaarden-Lindeboom; J Ringers; H G Gooszen; P J J van Rijn; R A Veenendaal; J M Conchillo; N D Bouvy; Adrian A M Masclee Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Zilla H Hussain; Emily E Henderson; Carla Maradey-Romerao; Nina George; Ronnie Fass; Brian E Lacy Journal: Clin Transl Gastroenterol Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 4.488