| Literature DB >> 23847677 |
Karolina Kowalska-Ludwicka1, Jaroslaw Cala, Bartlomiej Grobelski, Dominik Sygut, Dorota Jesionek-Kupnicka, Marek Kolodziejczyk, Stanislaw Bielecki, Zbigniew Pasieka.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The subject of the experiment was bacterial nanocellulose, a natural polymer produced by bacteria - Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Following a specific modification process a cartilage-like material for restoration of damaged tissues may be produced. The obtained implants with excellent biocompatibility, mouldability, biophysical and chemical properties perfectly fit the needs of reconstructive surgery. The goal of the experiment was to develop and analyze cellulosic guidance channels in vivo for the reconstruction of damaged peripheral nerves.Entities:
Keywords: bacterial nanocellulose; in vivo biocompatibility; neurotube; peripheral nerve regeneration
Year: 2013 PMID: 23847677 PMCID: PMC3701969 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2013.33433
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Sci ISSN: 1734-1922 Impact factor: 3.318
Figure 1Modified bacterial cellulose in the form of tubes
Figure 2Surgical procedures applied during the stabilization of bacterial cellulose nerve guidance channels at the site of the nerve injury: A – threading, B – stabilisation with four epineural sutures, C – regeneration of axons
The scale for grading motor recovery of the operated limbs
| System for grading nerve motor recovery | |
|---|---|
| 0 | No contraction (total palsy of the limb) |
| 1 | Return of perceptible contraction in the proximal muscles (limb palsy below the elbow, dragging of foot) |
| 2 | Return of perceptible contraction in the proximal and distal muscles (ability to move the foot during walking) |
| 3 | Return of function in proximal and distal muscles to such a degree that all important muscles are sufficiently powerful to act against gravity (ability to resist weak mechanical force and stand on disabled foot) |
| 4 | All muscles act against strong resistance and some independent movements are possible (disabled foot strong enough to push back during walking, slight contraction of fingers) |
| 5 | Full recovery of all muscles (difference between healthy and operated limb hardly visible) |
Comparison of motor recovery and the number of neuromas in the control and bacterial cellulose group
| Reconstruction method | Observation time [days] | Number of operated rats | Average motor recovery | Number of explants | Number of evaluable samples | Number of neuromas [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (end-to-end connection) | 30 | 4 | 0.50 | 2 | 2 | 100.00 |
| 60 | 5 | 1.10 | 5 | 3 | 100.00 | |
| 90 | 10 | 2.60 | 10 | 7 | 85.71 | |
| 180 | 5 | 3.33 | 5 | 3 | 66.67 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bacterial cellulose tubes | 30 | 5 | 0.48 | 3 | 3 | 100.00 |
| 60 | 6 | 1.48 | 6 | 4 | 75.00 | |
| 90 | 11 | 2.47 | 10 | 8 | 0.00 | |
| 180 | 8 | 3.75 | 8 | 5 | 20.00 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 3The difference in average motor recovery between the control and bacterial cellulose group after 30, 60, 90 and 180 days of observation
Figure 4Macroscopic view of explants: A – control group after 30 days, neuroma visible as a nodule at the connection site; B – bacterial cellulose tube overgrown with newly formed blood vessels after 90 days of implantation
Figure 5Explanted bacterial cellulose neurotubes with low tissue reaction after 90 days of implantation (A), and fibrotic tissue formed around the tube after 180 days (B) (H + E stain)
Figure 6Changes in the number of neuromas versus time for the control and bacterial cellulose group after 30, 60, 90 and 180 days of observation
Figure 7The results of S-100 staining: A – the overgrowth of connective tissue forming neuroma in the control group; B – the neuroma formed inside the tube, visible disorganisation of regenerating nerve fibres; C – properly regenerated nerve without the neuroma inside the cellulosic tube