BACKGROUND: Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) and juvenile retinitis pigmentosa (RP) are inherited retinal diseases that cause early onset severe visual impairment. An accurate molecular diagnosis can refine the clinical diagnosis and allow gene specific treatments. METHODS: We developed a capture panel that enriches the exonic DNA of 163 known retinal disease genes. Using this panel, we performed targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) for a large cohort of 179 unrelated and prescreened patients with the clinical diagnosis of LCA or juvenile RP. Systematic NGS data analysis, Sanger sequencing validation, and segregation analysis were utilised to identify the pathogenic mutations. Patients were revisited to examine the potential phenotypic ambiguity at the time of initial diagnosis. RESULTS: Pathogenic mutations for 72 patients (40%) were identified, including 45 novel mutations. Of these 72 patients, 58 carried mutations in known LCA or juvenile RP genes and exhibited corresponding phenotypes, while 14 carried mutations in retinal disease genes that were not consistent with their initial clinical diagnosis. We revisited patients in the latter case and found that homozygous mutations in PRPH2 can cause LCA/juvenile RP. Guided by the molecular diagnosis, we reclassified the clinical diagnosis in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified a novel gene and a large number of novel mutations that are associated with LCA/juvenile RP. Our results highlight the importance of molecular diagnosis as an integral part of clinical diagnosis.
BACKGROUND:Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) and juvenile retinitis pigmentosa (RP) are inherited retinal diseases that cause early onset severe visual impairment. An accurate molecular diagnosis can refine the clinical diagnosis and allow gene specific treatments. METHODS: We developed a capture panel that enriches the exonic DNA of 163 known retinal disease genes. Using this panel, we performed targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) for a large cohort of 179 unrelated and prescreened patients with the clinical diagnosis of LCA or juvenile RP. Systematic NGS data analysis, Sanger sequencing validation, and segregation analysis were utilised to identify the pathogenic mutations. Patients were revisited to examine the potential phenotypic ambiguity at the time of initial diagnosis. RESULTS: Pathogenic mutations for 72 patients (40%) were identified, including 45 novel mutations. Of these 72 patients, 58 carried mutations in known LCA or juvenile RP genes and exhibited corresponding phenotypes, while 14 carried mutations in retinal disease genes that were not consistent with their initial clinical diagnosis. We revisited patients in the latter case and found that homozygous mutations in PRPH2 can cause LCA/juvenile RP. Guided by the molecular diagnosis, we reclassified the clinical diagnosis in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified a novel gene and a large number of novel mutations that are associated with LCA/juvenile RP. Our results highlight the importance of molecular diagnosis as an integral part of clinical diagnosis.
Entities:
Keywords:
Clinical genetics; Genetic screening/counselling; Ophthalmology; Vision research
Authors: Panagiotis I Sergouniotis; Alice E Davidson; Donna S Mackay; Zheng Li; Xu Yang; Vincent Plagnol; Anthony T Moore; Andrew R Webster Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2011-07-15 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: R R Ali; G M Sarra; C Stephens; M D Alwis; J W Bainbridge; P M Munro; S Fauser; M B Reichel; C Kinnon; D M Hunt; S S Bhattacharya; A J Thrasher Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: H Morimura; G A Fishman; S A Grover; A B Fulton; E L Berson; T P Dryja Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1998-03-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Peter D Stenson; Matthew Mort; Edward V Ball; Katy Howells; Andrew D Phillips; Nick St Thomas; David N Cooper Journal: Genome Med Date: 2009-01-22 Impact factor: 11.117
Authors: Sylwia Chelstowska; Made Airanthi K Widjaja-Adhi; Josie A Silvaroli; Marcin Golczak Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2017-08-15 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Feng Wang; Hui Wang; Han-Fang Tuan; Duy H Nguyen; Vincent Sun; Vafa Keser; Sara J Bowne; Lori S Sullivan; Hongrong Luo; Ling Zhao; Xia Wang; Jacques E Zaneveld; Jason S Salvo; Sorath Siddiqui; Louise Mao; Dianna K Wheaton; David G Birch; Kari E Branham; John R Heckenlively; Cindy Wen; Ken Flagg; Henry Ferreyra; Jacqueline Pei; Ayesha Khan; Huanan Ren; Keqing Wang; Irma Lopez; Raheel Qamar; Juan C Zenteno; Raul Ayala-Ramirez; Beatriz Buentello-Volante; Qing Fu; David A Simpson; Yumei Li; Ruifang Sui; Giuliana Silvestri; Stephen P Daiger; Robert K Koenekoop; Kang Zhang; Rui Chen Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 4.132