Literature DB >> 23847082

High numbers of false-positive stress tests are the result of inappropriate testing.

Andrew Foy1, Jeremy Rier, Mark Kozak.   

Abstract

Patients who underwent coronary angiography preceded by stress testing during the period January 2009 through March 2012 were evaluated using the CathPCI database. The predictive accuracy of stress echocardiography (SE) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) were determined and used to back calculate the pretest probability of the population being tested. In total, 2662 catheterizations were performed, 866 (33%) of which were preceded by stress imaging. Overall, the positive predictive values of SE and SPECT did not differ significantly (61% and 66%, P = .15) and were much lower in certain subgroups. The overall pretest probabilities of patients without a documented history of coronary artery disease undergoing SE and SPECT in the study population were estimated to be 18% and 27%, respectively. This study shows that stress testing is performed too often in low-risk patients in whom it is unlikely to improve clinical decision making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  appropriate use; coronary artery disease; evidence-based medicine; positive predictive value; stress testing

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23847082     DOI: 10.1177/1062860613489726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Qual        ISSN: 1062-8606            Impact factor:   1.852


  2 in total

1.  False-positive Stress Echocardiography: Not as Simple as It Looks.

Authors:  In Jeong Cho
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-02-06

Review 2.  Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elin Kjelle; Eivind Richter Andersen; Arne Magnus Krokeide; Lesley J J Soril; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Fiona M Clement; Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.795

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.