Literature DB >> 23847041

Different response to acetic acid stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae wild-type and l-ascorbic acid-producing strains.

Francesca Martani1, Tiziana Fossati, Riccardo Posteri, Lorenzo Signori, Danilo Porro, Paola Branduardi.   

Abstract

Biotechnological processes are of increasing significance for industrial production of fine and bulk chemicals, including biofuels. Unfortunately, under operative conditions microorganisms meet multiple stresses, such as non-optimal pH, temperature, oxygenation and osmotic stress. Moreover, they have to face inhibitory compounds released during the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomasses, which constitute the preferential substrate for second-generation processes. Inhibitors include furan derivatives, phenolic compounds and weak organic acids, among which acetic acid is one of the most abundant and detrimental for cells. They impair cellular metabolism and growth, reducing the productivity of the process: therefore, the development of robust cell factories with improved production rates and resistance is of crucial importance. Here we show that a yeast strain engineered to endogenously produce vitamin C exhibits an increased tolerance compared to the parental strain when exposed to acetic acid at moderately toxic concentrations, measured as viability on plates. Starting from this evidence, we investigated more deeply: (a) the nature and levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS); (b) the activation of enzymes that act directly as detoxifiers of reactive oxygen species, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase, in parental and engineered strains during acetic acid stress. The data indicate that the engineered strain can better recover from stress by limiting ROS accumulation, independently from SOD activation. The engineered yeast can be proposed as a model for further investigating direct and indirect mechanism(s) by which an antioxidant can rescue cells from organic acid damage; moreover, these studies will possibly provide additional targets for further strain improvements.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Saccharomyces cerevisiae; acetic acid; cell factory; l-ascorbic acid (L-AA); reactive oxygen species (ROS); robustness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23847041     DOI: 10.1002/yea.2969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yeast        ISSN: 0749-503X            Impact factor:   3.239


  6 in total

1.  Noninvasive high-throughput single-cell analysis of the intracellular pH of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by ratiometric flow cytometry.

Authors:  Mari Valkonen; Dominik Mojzita; Merja Penttilä; Mojca Bencina
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Food preservative sorbic acid deregulates hepatic fatty acid metabolism.

Authors:  Chia-Hui Chen; Sin-Ni Ho; Po-An Hu; Yu Ru Kou; Tzong-Shyuan Lee
Journal:  J Food Drug Anal       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 6.157

3.  One-Step Biosynthesis of Vitamin C in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Mengyu Zhou; Yanhui Bi; Mingzhu Ding; Yingjin Yuan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  A simple FCM method to avoid misinterpretation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle assessment between G0 and sub-G1.

Authors:  Pierre Delobel; Catherine Tesnière
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Repeated batches as a strategy for high 2G ethanol production from undetoxified hemicellulose hydrolysate using immobilized cells of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a fixed-bed reactor.

Authors:  Thais S Milessi; Caroline L Perez; Teresa C Zangirolami; Felipe A S Corradini; Juliana P Sandri; Maria R Foulquié-Moreno; Roberto C Giordano; Johan M Thevelein; Raquel L C Giordano
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 6.040

6.  A new laboratory evolution approach to select for constitutive acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and identification of causal mutations.

Authors:  Daniel González-Ramos; Arthur R Gorter de Vries; Sietske S Grijseels; Margo C van Berkum; Steve Swinnen; Marcel van den Broek; Elke Nevoigt; Jean-Marc G Daran; Jack T Pronk; Antonius J A van Maris
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 6.040

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.