Literature DB >> 23846786

Intra-arterial therapy for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis.

Omar Hyder1, J Wallis Marsh, Riad Salem, Elena N Petre, Sanjeeva Kalva, Eleni Liapi, David Cosgrove, Donielle Neal, Ihab Kamel, Andrew X Zhu, Constantinos T Sofocleous, Jean-Francois H Geschwind, Timothy M Pawlik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) present with advanced and inoperable disease. Data on the safety and efficacy of intra-arterial therapy (IAT) for ICC are limited.
METHODS: Between 1992 and 2012, a total of 198 patients with advanced ICC treated with IAT were retrospectively identified from the databases of five major hepatobiliary institutions. Data on clinicopathological factors, morbidity, response rates, and overall survival were collected and analyzed.
RESULTS: Median patient age was 61 years. Median tumor size was 8.1 cm, and 47.5% patients had a solitary lesion. IAT consisted of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) (64.7%), drug-eluting beads (DEB) (5.6%), bland embolization (TAE) (6.6%), or yttrium-90 radioembolization (23.2%). Median number of IAT sessions was 2 (range 1-8). The median time between IAT sessions was 48 days. The periprocedural morbidity was 29.8%; most complications were minor (n = 43); however, 16 patients had a grade 3-4 complication. Assessment of tumor response revealed complete or partial response in 25.5% patients, while 61.5% had stable disease; 13.0% had progressive disease. Median overall survival was 13.2 months and did not differ on the basis of the type of IAT (cTACE, 13.4 months vs. DEB 10.5 months vs. TAE, 14.3 months vs. yttrium-90, 11.3 months; P = 0.46). IAT response on modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST; hazard ratio for complete-partial response 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.81; P < 0.001) was independently associated with better survival.
CONCLUSIONS: IAT for ICC was safe and led to stable disease or partial to complete response in up to three-quarters of patients. Among patients with an IAT response, overall survival was prolonged. The role of IAT therapy for ICC warrants further prospective evaluation in clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23846786     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3127-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  51 in total

Review 1.  Intra-arterial embolotherapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: update and future prospects.

Authors:  Lynn Jeanette Savic; Julius Chapiro; Jean-François H Geschwind
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 2.  Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management.

Authors:  Jesus M Banales; Jose J G Marin; Angela Lamarca; Pedro M Rodrigues; Shahid A Khan; Lewis R Roberts; Vincenzo Cardinale; Guido Carpino; Jesper B Andersen; Chiara Braconi; Diego F Calvisi; Maria J Perugorria; Luca Fabris; Luke Boulter; Rocio I R Macias; Eugenio Gaudio; Domenico Alvaro; Sergio A Gradilone; Mario Strazzabosco; Marco Marzioni; Cédric Coulouarn; Laura Fouassier; Chiara Raggi; Pietro Invernizzi; Joachim C Mertens; Anja Moncsek; Sumera Rizvi; Julie Heimbach; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Jordi Bruix; Alejandro Forner; John Bridgewater; Juan W Valle; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 3.  Transarterial approaches to primary and secondary hepatic malignancies.

Authors:  Ali Habib; Kush Desai; Ryan Hickey; Bartley Thornburg; Robert Lewandowski; Riad Salem
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  The evolving field of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Miral Sadaria Grandhi; Andrew J Page; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2015-01-12

Review 5.  Management of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: how do we decide among the various liver-directed treatments?

Authors:  Eugene J Koay; Bruno C Odisio; Milind Javle; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Christopher H Crane
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 6.  SIR-Spheres yttrium-90 radioembolization for the treatment of unresectable liver cancers.

Authors:  Rita Golfieri
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2014-09-09

Review 7.  Monitoring outcomes in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients following hepatic resection.

Authors:  Amir A Rahnemai-Azar; Pallavi Pandey; Ihab Kamel; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2017-01-20

Review 8.  Trans-arterial embolisation therapies for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Linda Yang; Jocelyn Shan; Leonard Shan; Akshat Saxena; Lourens Bester; David L Morris
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-10

9.  National trends in the use of surgery for benign hepatic tumors in the United States.

Authors:  Yuhree Kim; Neda Amini; Jin He; Georgios A Margonis; Matthew Weiss; Christopher L Wolfgang; Martin Makary; Kenzo Hirose; Gaya Spolverato; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  One case of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma amenable to resection after radioembolization.

Authors:  Cecilia Servajean; Marine Gilabert; Gilles Piana; Geneviève Monges; Jean-Robert Delpero; Isabelle Brenot; Jean-Luc Raoul
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.