Literature DB >> 23846517

F-18 FDG PET/CT in the assessment of patients with unexplained CEA rise after surgical curative resection for colorectal cancer.

S Giacomobono1, R Gallicchio, D Capacchione, A Nardelli, D Gattozzi, G Lettini, L Molinari, P Mainenti, A Cammarota, G Storto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the role of quantitative assessment by maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose [F-18]FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in stratifying colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with unexplained carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) rise after surgical curative resection.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty asymptomatic patients (mean age, 64 ± 12 years) with previous CRC and current serum CEA levels >5 ng/ml underwent [F-18] FDG PET/CT 13 ± 3 months after complete surgical resection. The SUVmax was registered on anastomosis and peri-anastomotic tissue lesions, if present. The patients were followed for 24 ± 9 months thereafter. Re-intervention, evidence of newly discovered distant metastases, and death were recognized as main events and constituted surrogate end points. The receiver-operator-curve (ROC) analysis was performed to estimate the optimal SUVmax cut-off to predict patients at high risk of main events. PET/CT results were then related to disease outcome (overall survival; OS).
RESULTS: The mean SUVmax at the anastomotic site was 6.2 ± 3 (range 2.6-15). At multivariate logistic regression analysis, the anastomotic SUVmax remained as the only significant contributor to the prediction of the events (p = 0.004; OR 1.97). The ROC analysis recognized that the optimal threshold of SUVmax to differentiate patients was 5.7. A worse OS was observed in patients presenting with a SUVmax greater than 5.7 as compared to those having lesser (median survival: 16 vs. 31 months; p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: The quantitative assessment by SUVmax on [F-18]FDG PET/CT may be helpful in patients presenting with unexplained CEA rise after curative resection of CRC, by identifying those at risk of main events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23846517     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1747-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  32 in total

Review 1.  Imaging modalities for the staging of patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S Bipat; M C Niekel; E F I Comans; C Y Nio; W A Bemelman; C Verhoef; J Stoker
Journal:  Neth J Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  Clinical impact of 18F-FDG-PET in the suspicion of recurrent colorectal cancer based on asymptomatically elevated serum level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in Taiwan.

Authors:  Yeh-You Shen; Ji-An Liang; Yen-Kung Chen; Chun-Yueh Tsai; Chia-Hung Kao
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2006 May-Jun

Review 3.  Personalized medicine and oncology practice guidelines: a case study of contemporary biomarkers in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Robin K Kelley; Stephanie L Van Bebber; Kathryn A Phillips; Alan P Venook
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 4.  False-positive uptake on 2-[¹⁸F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in oncological imaging.

Authors:  A D Culverwell; A F Scarsbrook; F U Chowdhury
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging-detected tumor response for locally advanced rectal cancer predicts survival outcomes: MERCURY experience.

Authors:  Uday B Patel; Fiona Taylor; Lennart Blomqvist; Christopher George; Hywel Evans; Paris Tekkis; Philip Quirke; David Sebag-Montefiore; Brendan Moran; Richard Heald; Ashley Guthrie; Nicola Bees; Ian Swift; Kjell Pennert; Gina Brown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Colorectal cancer and 18FDG-PET/CT: what about adding the T to the N parameter in loco-regional staging?

Authors:  Pier Paolo Mainenti; Delfina Iodice; Sabrina Segreto; Giovanni Storto; Mario Magliulo; Giovanni Domenico De Palma; Marco Salvatore; Leonardo Pace
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Utility of FDG-PET for investigating unexplained plasma CEA elevation in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  F L Flanagan; F Dehdashti; O A Ogunbiyi; I J Kodner; B A Siegel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Differentiation between peri-anastomotic inflammatory changes and local recurrence following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy surgery for colorectal cancer using visual and semiquantitative analysis of PET-CT data.

Authors:  P Smeets; H Ham; W Ceelen; T Boterberg; K Verstraete; I Goethals
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 2.346

Review 9.  Cancer statistics, 2004.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Ram C Tiwari; Taylor Murray; Asma Ghafoor; Alicia Samuels; Elizabeth Ward; Eric J Feuer; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Locoregional recurrence and survival after curative resection of adenocarcinoma of the colon.

Authors:  Thomas E Read; Matthew G Mutch; Benjamin W Chang; Michael S McNevin; James W Fleshman; Elisa H Birnbaum; Robert D Fry; Philip F Caushaj; Ira J Kodner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Non-invasive diagnostic imaging of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Pier Paolo Mainenti; Federica Romano; Laura Pizzuti; Sabrina Segreto; Giovanni Storto; Lorenzo Mannelli; Massimo Imbriaco; Luigi Camera; Simone Maurea
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-28

Review 2.  Early detection of colorectal cancer recurrence in patients undergoing surgery with curative intent: current status and challenges.

Authors:  Patrick E Young; Craig M Womeldorph; Eric K Johnson; Justin A Maykel; Bjorn Brucher; Alex Stojadinovic; Itzhak Avital; Aviram Nissan; Scott R Steele
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 3.  Colorectal cancer: Parametric evaluation of morphological, functional and molecular tomographic imaging.

Authors:  Pier Paolo Mainenti; Arnaldo Stanzione; Salvatore Guarino; Valeria Romeo; Lorenzo Ugga; Federica Romano; Giovanni Storto; Simone Maurea; Arturo Brunetti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Clinical Significance of Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/computed Tomography in the Follow-up of Colorectal Cancer: Searching off Approaches Increasing Specificity for Detection of Recurrence.

Authors:  Semra Ince; Kursat Okuyucu; Oguz Hancerliogulları; Engin Alagoz; Huseyin San; Nuri Arslan
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.991

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.