Literature DB >> 23845587

The epidemiology of reoperation after flexor pulley reconstruction.

Christopher J Dy1, Stephen Lyman, Joseph J Schreiber, Huong T Do, Aaron Daluiski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We used a statewide database to determine the incidence of pulley reconstruction and to evaluate the influence of demographics on reoperation. We hypothesized that age, insurance status, and concomitant nerve or tendon procedure would influence the likelihood of reoperation.
METHODS: We used the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System ambulatory surgery database from New York, which represents all outpatient surgery in the state. Patients who had flexor pulley reconstruction from 1998 to 2009 were identified using Current Procedural Terminology 4 codes. Subsequent surgery records for these patients were identified through 2010, allowing at least 1 year follow-up. Concomitant nerve procedure and flexor tendon repair/reconstruction were identified. The type and timing of subsequent procedures, including tenolysis and repeat pulley reconstruction, were recorded. Univariate statistics were calculated to compare age, sex, and payer type between patients with and without reoperation. A multivariable, logistic regression model was used to evaluate the association of the demographics with the chances of having reoperation.
RESULTS: There were 623 patients who had flexor pulley reconstruction from 1998 to 2009. The incidence of pulley reconstruction was 0.27 per 100,000 persons, with an annual frequency of 52 procedures. There were 39 (6%) reoperations. There was no difference in age, concomitant nerve or tendon repair, or workers' compensation between patients with and without reoperation. Regression modeling showed a higher likelihood among men of having reoperation.
CONCLUSIONS: Flexor pulley reconstructions are rare. One-quarter of surgeons performed only one flexor pulley reconstruction over a 12-year period. The 6% reoperation rate is similar to our previous findings for flexor tendon repair using similar methodology. Our report provides information that may be useful in counseling patients.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; flexor pulley; outcomes; socioeconomic

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23845587      PMCID: PMC3932671          DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  18 in total

1.  Bone resorption of the proximal phalanx after tendon pulley reconstruction.

Authors:  G T Lin
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 2.  Palmar and digital flexor tendon pulleys.

Authors:  J R Doyle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Closed traumatic rupture of the ring finger flexor tendon pulley.

Authors:  Y Tropet; D Menez; P Balmat; R Pem; P Vichard
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.230

4.  Disruption of the finger flexor pulley system in elite rock climbers.

Authors:  M Gabl; C Rangger; M Lutz; C Fink; A Rudisch; S Pechlaner
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Three-loop technique for A2 pulley reconstruction.

Authors:  I Okutsu; S Ninomiya; S Hiraki; H Inanami; N Kuroshima
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Two-stage flexor-tendon reconstruction. Ten-year experience.

Authors:  M A Wehbé; B Mawr; J M Hunter; L H Schneider; B L Goodwyn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Digital pulley reconstruction employing the always present rim of the previous pulley.

Authors:  H E Klinert; J B Bennett
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.230

8.  Possible complication of belt loop pulley reconstruction.

Authors:  C J Eaton
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  Closed traumatic rupture of finger flexor pulleys.

Authors:  W H Bowers; G R Kuzma; D K Bynum
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  The epidemiology of reoperation after flexor tendon repair.

Authors:  Christopher J Dy; Aaron Daluiski; Huong T Do; Alexia Hernandez-Soria; Robert Marx; Stephen Lyman
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.230

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The quality of control groups in nonrandomized studies published in the Journal of Hand Surgery.

Authors:  Shepard P Johnson; Sunitha Malay; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.230

2.  Acute A4 Pulley Reconstruction with a First Extensor Compartment Onlay Graft.

Authors:  Michael G Jakubietz; Rainer H Meffert; Karsten Schmidt; Joerg G Gruenert; Rafael G Jakubietz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-06-28

3.  A Potentially Inexpensive Diagnostic Method for A2 Pulley Ruptures.

Authors:  Fenil Bhatt; Arij Batul; Francisco Schwartz-Fernandes
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-09-25

4.  Dynamic Tendon Grip (DTG™) novel knot array compared to traditional sutures for zone two flexor tendon injury - a biomechanical feasibility study.

Authors:  Assaf Kadar; Alon Fainzack; Mordechai Vigler
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.