Literature DB >> 23844826

Preventing irritant contact dermatitis with protective creams: influence of the application dose.

Sibylle Schliemann1, Maximilian Petri, Peter Elsner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Skin protection creams (PC)s are used in the occupational setting to help prevent irritant hand dermatitis. The actual amounts of PC applied and the resulting dose per unit area on hands at work are lower than recommended.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of the applied dose on the efficacy of PCs in the prevention of irritant contact dermatitis.
METHODS: Experimental cumulative irritant contact dermatitis was induced by twice daily application of 0.5% NaOH or sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) for 4 days on the backs of 20 healthy volunteers. Test areas were left unprotected or were pretreated with three different PCs applied at a low dose (2 mg/cm(2) ) or a high dose (20 mg/cm(2) ) before irritation. Irritant responses were assessed by visual scoring and measurement of transepidermal water loss, chromametry, and corneometry.
RESULTS: Although cumulative irritant dermatitis developed in all unprotected test sites, irritation was significantly reduced in a dose-dependent manner on PC-protected sites. The higher doses of all PCs provided significant protection against irritation. However, the lower dose of one product did not significantly protect against SLS-induced irritation.
CONCLUSIONS: The protective efficacy of PCs depends on the amount of product applied per unit skin surface area. Some products may show no protective efficacy when used at doses close to those practically applied at workplaces. Future efficacy studies of PCs should be performed with doses not higher than 2 mg/cm(2) , to avoid overestimation of their protective efficacy.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  barrier cream; cumulative irritation; efficacy; occupational dermatitis; prevention; quantity; skin protection cream

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23844826     DOI: 10.1111/cod.12104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of transepidermal water loss rates in subjects with skin patch test positive vs negative to skin care products.

Authors:  Dan Liu; Si Wen; Li-Ning Huang; Xiaohua Wang; Can-Yi Gong; Zhiping Li; Hui Wang; Peter M Elias; Bin Yang; Mao-Qiang Man
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 2.  [Prevention of hand eczema].

Authors:  R Brans; C Skudlik
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 3.  Interventions for preventing occupational irritant hand dermatitis.

Authors:  Andrea Bauer; Henriette Rönsch; Peter Elsner; Daan Dittmar; Cathy Bennett; Marie-Louise A Schuttelaar; Judit Lukács; Swen Malte John; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-30

Review 4.  Irritant Contact Dermatitis - a Review.

Authors:  Kajal Patel; Rosemary Nixon
Journal:  Curr Dermatol Rep       Date:  2022-04-07

5.  Hand eczema, wet work exposure, and quality of life in health care workers in Denmark during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Yasemin Topal Yüksel; Line Brok Nørreslet; Esben Meulengracht Flachs; Niels Erik Ebbehøj; Tove Agner
Journal:  JAAD Int       Date:  2022-03-07

6.  Topical N-palmitoyl serinol, a commensal bacterial metabolite, prevents the development of epidermal permeability barrier dysfunction in a murine model of atopic dermatitis-like skin.

Authors:  Si Wen; Li Ye; Dan Liu; Bin Yang; Mao-Qiang Man
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 1.310

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.