| Literature DB >> 23844405 |
Nurdan Gamze Turan1, Okan Ozgonenel.
Abstract
Clinoptilolite was investigated for the removal of Cu(II) ions from industrial leachate. Adaptive neural fuzzy interface system (ANFIS) was used for modeling the batch experimental system and predicting the optimal input values, that is, initial pH, adsorbent dosage, and contact time. Experiments were studied under laboratory batch and fixed bed conditions. The outcomes of suggested ANFIS modeling were then compared to a full factorial experimental design (2(3)), which was utilized to assess the effect of three factors on the adsorption of Cu(II) ions in aqueous leachate of industrial waste. It was observed that the optimized parameters are almost close to each other. The highest removal efficiency was found as about 93.65% at pH 6, adsorbent dosage 11.4 g/L, and contact time 33 min for batch conditions of 2(3) experimental design and about 90.43% at pH 5, adsorbent dosage 15 g/L and contact time 35 min for batch conditions of ANFIS. The results show that clinoptilolite is an efficient sorbent and ANFIS, which is easy to implement and is able to model the batch experimental system.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23844405 PMCID: PMC3691903 DOI: 10.1155/2013/590267
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Chemical analysis of materials.
| Components | %w/w | |
|---|---|---|
| Clinoptilolite | Industrial waste | |
| Na2O | 0.40 | — |
| MgO | 1.40 | 0.36 |
| Al2O3 | 11.80 | 0.92 |
| SiO2 | 71.00 | 24.87 |
| CaO | 3.40 | 0.69 |
| TiO2 | 0.10 | 0.08 |
| K2O | 2.40 | 0.48 |
| F2O3 | 1.70 | 67.68 |
| ZnO | — | 2.78 |
| CuO | — | 0.98 |
| PbO | — | 0.21 |
| MnO | — | 0.12 |
| CoO | — | 0.21 |
| SO3 | 0.12 | 2.18 |
NZ: natural zeolite, B: bentonite, FW: flotation waste.
Figure 1SEM microphotograph of clinoptilolite.
Figure 2Proposed ANFIS structure for Cu(II) removal system.
Experimental design (23).
| Initial pH, | Adsorbent dosage (g/L), | Contact time (min), | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 5 | 20 | 72.04 |
| 3 | 5 | 60 | 78.20 |
| 3 | 20 | 20 | 90.77 |
| 3 | 20 | 60 | 95.04 |
| 6 | 5 | 20 | 88.70 |
| 6 | 5 | 60 | 93.09 |
| 6 | 20 | 20 | 98.42 |
| 6 | 20 | 60 | 98.1 |
%R: removal efficiency of Cu(II) ions.
The most common MFs and their associated expressions.
| Triangular MF, trimf |
|
| Trapezoidal MF, trapmf |
|
| Generalized bell-shaped MF |
|
| Gaussian curve MF |
|
| pi-shape MF |
|
| MF composed of the difference between two sigmoidal MFs, dsigmf |
|
| Product of the two sigmoid MF, psigmf |
|
Figure 3The effect of initial pH on Cu(II) removal.
Figure 4The effect of adsorbent dosage (g/L) on Cu(II) removal.
Figure 5The effect of contact time (min) on Cu(II) removal.
ANOVA for 23 full factor experimental design.
| Source | Sum of squares | d.f. | Mean square |
|
| Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 630.57 | 6 | 105.1 | 105.72 | 0.0743 | |
|
| 223.24 | 1 | 223.24 | 224.57 | 0.0424 | Significant |
|
| 316.26 | 1 | 316.26 | 318.15 | 0.0357 | Significant |
|
| 26.28 | 1 | 26.28 | 26.44 | 0.1223 | |
|
| 54.291 | 1 | 54.291 | 54.61 | 0.0586 | |
|
| 5.06 | 1 | 5.06 | 5.09 | 0.2657 | |
|
| 5.44 | 1 | 5.44 | 5.48 | 0.2571 | |
| Residual | 0.99 | 1 | 0.99 | |||
| Corr. total | 631.56 | 7 |
A: initial pH; B: adsorbent dosage; C: contact time.
Figure 6Main effects of analyzed factors.
Figure 7Interaction effects of analyzed factors.
Figure 8Prediction of removal efficiency with optimized parameters.
Optimized factors and predicted removal efficiencies by ANFIS and 23 full factorial design.
| Source |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 full factorial design | 6 | 11.4 | 33 | 93.65 |
| ANFIS | 5 | 15 | 35 | 90.43 |
A: initial pH; B: adsorbent dosage; C: contact time.