| Literature DB >> 23844222 |
Xingfei Pan1, Ka Zhang, Xiaoan Yang, Jiayi Liang, Haixia Sun, Xuejun Li, Yong Zou, Qingqiang Xu, Geng An, Gang Li, Qihuan Xu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients recur after off-therapy and have to accept prolonged consolidation therapy with NUCs. We investigated the rate of HBV relapse after stopping NUCs therapy with different time period of prolonged consolidation therapy in HBeAg positive CHB patients, and analyzed the associated-factor of recurrence.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23844222 PMCID: PMC3701059 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068568
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Baseline characteristics of the study population.
| Factors | Group A | Group B1 | Group B2 | Group B3 | F(X2/Z) value |
|
| Gender(M/F) | 28/12 | 46/8 | 18/5 | 13/6 | (3.982) | 0.226 |
| Age (Year) | 34.5±10.5 | 36.3±9.6 | 34.4±8.7 | 35.5±9.2 | 0.365 | 0.779 |
| HBV DNA(log10 copies/ml) | 5.8±1.3 | 5.7±1.3 | 6.2±1.2 | 6.0±0.8 | 1.436 | 0.242 |
| ALB(g/L) | 45.1±3.8 | 44.2±3.9 | 44.7±3.7 | 42.3±6.1 | 1.948 | 0.125 |
| ALT (U/L) | 93(66–217) | 75(56–134) | 75(55–186) | 128(74–448) | (/4.164) | 0.244 |
| AST(U/L) | 73(43–140) | 78(56–147) | 108(56–1725) | 96(70–209) | (/3.670) | 0.299 |
| TBIL(µmol/L) | 15(10–19) | 15(11–24) | 15(11–21) | 15(10–25) | (/1.518) | 0.678 |
| Period of prolonged consolidation therapy (month) | 0(0–0) | 7(3–11) | 17(13–20) | 28(25–34) | ||
| Time to HBeAg seroconversion (month) | 28(14–40) | 30(22–48) | 34(30–50) | 32(21–55) | ||
| Time to undetectable HBV DNA (month) | 17(14–27) | 18(19–33) | 25(22–43) | 22(19–39) | ||
| Total treatment duration (month) | 35.8±5.0 | 40.1±6.4 | 45.9±7.3 | 59.3±17.3 | ||
| HBV genotype | All C | |||||
Figure 1Cumulative rate of relapse in 136 CHB patients.
Group A, 40 patients without the prolonged consolidation therapy. Group B, 96 patients with the different time period of the prolonged consolidation therapy. Group B1, 54 patients with 7 (range 3–11) months of the prolonged consolidation therapy. Group B2, 23 patients with 17 (range 13–20) months of the prolonged consolidation therapy. Group B3, 19 patients with 28 (range 25–34) months of the prolonged consolidation therapy. Fig. 1A showed the difference in the cumulative rate of relapse between group A and group B (P<0.05). Fig. 1B–D showed the difference in the cumulative rate of relapse among group B1, B2 and B3.
Associated-factors of HBV recurrence by Cox’s hazards model.
| Factor |
|
|
|
|
|
| Age at off-therapy | 0.044 | 13.462 | 0.000 | 1.045 | (1.021, 1.069) |
| ALT at baseline | −0.001 | 5.818 | 0.016 | 0.999 | (0.997, 1.000) |
| Different period of prolonged consolidation | −0.027 | 4.672 | 0.031 | 0.974 | (0.951, 0.998) |
Note: B, regression coefficient; Wald, χ2 value; RR, risk ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 2The difference in the cumulative rate of relapse between age ≤37 and age >37, ALT>80 U/L and ALT ≤80 U/L, the time period of the prolonged consolidation therapy>11 months and that ≤11 months.
Fig. 2A showed the difference in the cumulative rate of relapse between age≤37 and age>37 (P<0.05). Fig. 2B showed the difference in the cumulative rate of relapse between ALT>80 U/L and ALT≤80 U/L (P<0.05). Fig. 2C showed the difference between the time period of the prolonged consolidation therapy>11 months and that ≤11 months (P<0.05).