| Literature DB >> 23844198 |
Martin Šandera1, Tomáš Albrecht, Pavel Stopka.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Post-copulatory sexual selection has been shown to shape morphology of male gametes. Both directional and stabilizing selection on sperm phenotype have been documented in vertebrates in response to sexual promiscuity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23844198 PMCID: PMC3700964 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068427
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Phylogeny of studied species.
The figure illustrates the phylogenetic relationships among the studied species [40], [41], [42].
Generalised linear least square tests of: a) the effect of the relative testis weight (proxy measure for post-copulatory sexual selection) on sperm length traits, b) the effect of hook length on its variation c) the effect of sperm tail length on its variation.
| Sperm trait | Slope ± SE | t-value | p | λ | R2 |
| a) relationships between relative testis weight and sperm traits | |||||
| hook length | 25.6±2.96 | 8.63 | <0.001 | <0.0011.0, 0.14 | 0.94 |
| CVwmhook | −1.70±0.28 | −6.07 | 0.004 | <0.0011.0, 0.13 | 0.88 |
| CVbmhook | −5.31±1.25 | −4.26 | 0.013 | <0.0011.0, 0.11 | 0.82 |
| tail length | 95.5±36.9 | 2.59 | 0.061 | 0.999 0.17, 1.0 | 0.53 |
| CVwmtail | −0.21±0.78 | −0.27 | 0.804 | <0.0011.0,0.13 | 0.017 |
| CVbmtail | 0.03±3.90 | 0.008 | 0.994 | <0.0011.0, 0.09 | <0.001 |
| b) relationships between hook length and hook variation | |||||
| CVwmhook | −0.062±0.014 | −4.27 | 0.013 | <0.0011.0, 0.06 | 0.82 |
| CVbmhook | −0.212±0.035 | −6.05 | 0.004 | <0.0011.0, 0.07 | 0.90 |
| c) relationships between tail length and tail variation | |||||
| CVwmtail | 0.001±0.009 | 0.036 | 0.97 | <0.0011.0, 0.11 | <0.001 |
| CVbmtail | 0.002±0.043 | 0.054 | 0.96 | <0.0011.0, 0.09 | <0.001 |
CVwm is the average coefficient of within-male variation in hook length and tail length. CVbm is the coefficient of between-male variation in sperm traits, adjusted for sample size (see Methods). The statistical analyses were performed in R and based on transformed variables to approach normality (arcsine square-root for the proportion of relative testis weight, log for CVwm and CVbm). Slopes were tested against the prediction of 0 using the t-test. Lambda (λ) indicates the level of phylogenetic dependence in the data, with superscripts giving p-values for test of λ = 0 and λ = 1 respectively. R2 values indicate the proportion of total variance explained.
Figure 2Relationships between relative testis weight and variation in sperm hook length in murine rodents.
A) Relationship between relative testis weight and within-male variation in sperm hook length. The figure illustrates the linear regression of the coefficient of within-male variation in apical hook length on the proportion of relative testis weight for six studied rodent species. B) Relationship between relative testis weight and between-male variation in sperm hook length. The figure illustrates the linear regression of the coefficient of within-male variation on the proportion of relative testis weight in apical hook length for six studied rodent species.