Literature DB >> 23843928

Dynamical account of how /b, d, g/ differ from /p, t, k/ in Spanish: Evidence from labials.

Benjamin Parrell.   

Abstract

This study examines articulatory lenition of intervocalic stops in Spanish and tests the theories that 1) /b, d, g/ have an intended target for closure equal to that of /p, t, k/ and 2) spirantization of /b, d, g/ is caused by undershoot due to their short duration phrase medially. Consistent with past acoustic studies, subjects produce /b/ with incomplete closure phrase medially and complete closure phrase initially. Additionally, /b/ is shorter than /p/ phrase medially though not initially. For /b/, though not for /p/, there is a correlation between constriction degree and duration, consistent with the theory of dynamical undershoot. The results from the study are accurately modeled with a virtual target for /b/ slightly beyond the point of articulator contact. Such a target results in full closure at long durations (such as found phrase initially) and incomplete closure at shorter durations. Based on this evidence, it is proposed that /b, d, g/ differ from /p, t, k/ in three ways: they are shorter, lack a devoicing gesture, and have a target closer to - but still beyond - the point of articulator contact.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 23843928      PMCID: PMC3703669          DOI: 10.1515/labphon.2011.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Phonol        ISSN: 1868-6346


  10 in total

1.  Acoustical and perceptual study of gemination in Italian stops.

Authors:  A Esposito; M G Di Benedetto
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Articulatory phonology: an overview.

Authors:  C P Browman; L Goldstein
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.759

3.  Interarticulator programming: effects of closure duration on lip and tongue coordination in Japanese.

Authors:  Anders Löfqvist
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  How far, how long: on the temporal scope of prosodic boundary effects.

Authors:  Dani Byrd; Jelena Krivokapić; Sungbok Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A quasiarticulatory approach to controlling acoustic source parameters in a Klatt-type formant synthesizer using HLsyn.

Authors:  Helen M Hanson; Kenneth N Stevens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The articulatory kinematics of final lengthening.

Authors:  J Edwards; M E Beckman; J Fletcher
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Lip and jaw kinematics in bilabial stop consonant production.

Authors:  A Löfqvist; V L Gracco
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Lip kinematics in long and short stop and fricative consonants.

Authors:  Anders Löfqvist
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Intention in Articulation: Articulatory Timing in Alternating Consonant Sequences and Its Implications for Models of Speech Production.

Authors:  Pouplier Marianne; Louis Goldstein
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2010-04-01

10.  Phrase boundary effects on the temporal kinematics of sequential tongue tip consonants.

Authors:  Dani Byrd; Sungbok Lee; Rebeka Campos-Astorkiza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.482

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Explaining Coronal Reduction: Prosodic Structure and Articulatory Posture.

Authors:  Benjamin Parrell; Shrikanth Narayanan
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 1.759

2.  Bridging Dynamical Systems and Optimal Trajectory Approaches to Speech Motor Control With Dynamic Movement Primitives.

Authors:  Benjamin Parrell; Adam C Lammert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.