Literature DB >> 2384384

Performance of crosses among Hereford, Angus and Simmental cattle with different levels of Simmental breeding: V. Calf production, milk production and reproduction of three- to eight-year-old dams.

D D Kress1, D E Doornbos, D C Anderson.   

Abstract

Measures of maternal productivity and reproduction of Hereford (HH), Angus-Hereford (AH), 25% Simmental-75% Hereford (1S3H), 50% Simmental-50% Hereford (1S1H) and 75% Simmental-25% Hereford (3S1H) dams were studied. Half of each dam breed group was bred to Tartentaise and half to Charolais sires to produce 706 calves at weaning from 930 exposures to breeding in a Montana range environment. Data were analyzed according to a model that included the fixed effects of year, dam breed group, dam age, calf sex, calf sire breed, plus appropriate two-way interactions, linear partial regression on calf birth date and random effects of sire within dam breed group (maternal grandsire of the calf) and sire within calf sire breed. Calf sex interacted with calf sire breed for several traits, but interactions were due to changes of magnitude of differences between sexes. There were no significant interactions of dam breed group with other main effects for calf growth traits, except for the interaction with calf sire breed for some calf growth traits. This interaction was due to a change in magnitude; it suggested that larger sire breeds should be matched to larger dam breeds with greater potential for milk production. The only significant interaction for traits that included reproduction of the dam was dam breed group X age of dam. Ranking of dam breed groups depended on age at measurement. Differences among dam breed groups were significant for most traits. Calf weaning weights for HH, AH, 1S3H, 1S1H and 3S1H dams were 211, 223, 227, 237 and 243 kg, respectively; calf weaning weights per cow exposed were 157, 163, 179, 189 and 169 kg; calf weaning weights per unit of dam weight were .40, .41, .43, .44 and .42, respectively. Thus, dam breed groups that weaned the largest calves were not necessarily the most productive under Montana range conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2384384     DOI: 10.2527/1990.6871910x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  4 in total

1.  Strategies of supplementation of female suckling calves and nutrition parameters of beef cows on tropical pasture.

Authors:  Eriton Egidio Lisboa Valente; Mario Fonseca Paulino; Edenio Detmann; Sebastião de Campos Valadares Filho; Livia Vieira Barros; Carla Heloisa Avelino Cabral; Aline Gomes Silva; Marcio de Souza Duarte
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Weight, body condition, milk production, and metabolism of Nellore cows when their calves are submitted to different supplementation levels.

Authors:  Aline Gomes da Silva; Mário Fonseca Paulino; Lincoln da Silva Amorim; Edenio Detmann; Luciana Navajas Rennó; Márcio de Souza Duarte; Felipe Henrique de Moura; Luciano Prímola de Melo; Paulo Henrique Silva E Paiva; Marcos Rocha Manso; Victor Valério de Carvalho
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Effect of calves' supplementation on performance, nutritional and behavioral characteristics of their dams.

Authors:  Eriton Egidio Lisboa Valente; Mário Fonseca Paulino; Edenio Detmann; Sebastião Campos Valadares de Filho; Lívia Vieira Barros; Nelcino Francisco de Paula; Sidnei Antônio Lopes; Daniel Majeste de Almeida; Leandro Soares Martins
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Does supplementation of beef calves by creep feeding systems influence milk production and body condition of the dams?

Authors:  Sidnei Antônio Lopes; Mário Fonseca Paulino; Edenio Detmann; Ériton Egídio Lisboa Valente; Lívia Vieira de Barros; Luciana Navajas Rennó; Sebastião de Campos Valadares Filho; Leandro Soares Martins
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 1.559

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.