| Literature DB >> 23843788 |
Ender Hur1, Alev Garip, Asuman Camyar, Sibel Ilgun, Melih Ozisik, Sena Tuna, Murat Olukman, Zehra Narli Ozdemir, Eser Yildirim Sozmen, Sait Sen, Fehmi Akcicek, Soner Duman.
Abstract
Introduction. Acute kidney injury (AKI) pathogenesis is complex. Findings of gentamicin nephrotoxicity are seen in 30% of the AKI patients. Vitamin D has proven to be effective on renin expression, inflammatory response, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and atherosclerosis. We aimed to investigate the effect of vitamin D in an experimental rat model of gentamicin-induced AKI. Methods. Thirty nonuremic Wistar albino rats were divided into 3 groups: Control group, 1 mL saline intramuscular (im) daily; Genta group, gentamicin 100 mg/kg/day (im); Genta + vitamin D, gentamicin 100 mg/kg/day (im) in addition to 1 α , 25 (OH)2D3 0.4 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously for 8 days. Blood pressures and 24-hour urine were measured. Blood urea and creatinine levels and urine tubular injury markers were measured. Renal histology was semiquantitatively assessed. Results. Urea, creatinine and urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, and kidney injury molecule-1 were all increased in Genta group indicating AKI model. Systolic blood pressure decreased, but urine volume and glutathione increased in Genta + Vit D group compared to Control group. Histological scores indicating tubular injury increased in Genta and Genta + Vit D groups. Conclusions. Vitamin D does not seem to be effective on histological findings although it has some beneficial effects via RAS system and a promising effect on antioxidant system.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23843788 PMCID: PMC3697300 DOI: 10.1155/2013/313528
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Endocrinol ISSN: 1687-8337 Impact factor: 3.257
Figure 1Blood pressures.
Figure 2Urine Volumes.
Figure 3Renal function tests.
Figure 4Urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and glutathione levels.
Clinical and laboratory findings.
| Control, | Genta, | Genta + Vit D, | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SBP (mmHg) | 120 ± 6 | 125 ± 10 | 112 ± 13a |
| DBP (mmHg) | 68 ± 4 | 75 ± 7 | 74 ± 8 |
| Urine volume (cc) | 3 ± 0.5 | 2.4 ± 0.4 | 3.4 ± 0.5a |
| Urea (mg/dL) | 91 ± 6 | 137 ± 6a | 149 ± 5a |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.74 ± 0.03 | 1.1 ± 0.1a | 1.6 ± 0.3a |
| NGAL (ng/mL) | 49.5 ± 7 | 390 ± 143a | 247 ± 112 |
| GSH (nmol/mL) | 0.4 ± 0.13 | 0.3 ± 0.04 | 0.6 ± 0.1a |
| GGT (U/L) | 1.3 ± 0.35 | 38 ± 37 | 59 ± 19a |
| KIM-1 (ng/mL) | 0.64 ± 0.05 | 4.7 ± 0.6a | 6 ± 0.5a |
| TD | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 2 ± 0a | 2.3 ± 0.2a |
| TN | 0 | 1.3 ± 0.2a | 1.2 ± 0.2a |
| TIN | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 0.2a | 2 ± 0.1ab |
| THS | 0.75 ± 0.15 | 3.4 ± 0.4a | 6.3 ± 0.7ab |
SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; NGAL: neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; GSH: glutathione; KIM: kidney injury molecule; TD: tubular degeneration; TN: tubular necrosis; TIN: tubulointerstitial nephritis; THS: total histological score; P < 0.05, aGroup versus Control, bGroup versus Genta.
Figure 5Renal histology. Pathological examination performed by semiquantitatively scored from 0 to 3.
Figure 6Renal pathology.