Literature DB >> 23843728

POINT-OF-CARE HEMATOLOGY AND COAGULATION TESTING IN PRIMARY, RURAL EMERGENCY, AND DISASTER CARE SCENARIOS.

Corbin M Curtis1, Gerald J Kost, Richard F Louie, Rebecca J Sonu, Erika B Ammirati, Stephanie Sumner.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to review current principles and criteria for obtaining Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA '88) waiver, identify existing point-of-care (POC) coagulation and hematology technologies, and analyze regulatory challenges regarding CLIA-waiver for those and future devices. CLIA '88 documentation requires tests performed by laboratories with a Certificate of Waiver to be so simple that the likelihood of erroneous results by the user is negligible, or poses no unreasonable risk of harm to the patient if performed incorrectly as determined by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. "Simple" means that the test uses unprocessed samples, has a direct read-out of test results, does not have specifications for user training, and includes instructions for confirmatory testing when advisable. Currently the CLIA-waived hematology and coagulation POC devices only test for hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), and prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR). The problem with these devices is the lack of multiplexing. POC coagulation and hematology devices face challenges for obtaining a waiver. These challenges include the lack of clinical needs assessment, miniturized assays that correct for interfering substances, and assays simple enough to be combined in a multiplex platform. Several scenarios demonstrate how POC coagulation or hematology devices can improve crisis care. Industry should perform needs assessment on clinicians and emergency responders to determine which analytes to incorporate on multiplex POC coagulation and hematology devices, and produce devices that address confounding factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA ’88) waiver; Clinical needs assessment (CNA); Food and Drug Administration (FDA); accuracy; confounding factors

Year:  2012        PMID: 23843728      PMCID: PMC3703674          DOI: 10.1097/POC.0b013e31825a9d3a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Point Care        ISSN: 1533-029X


  19 in total

1.  An error in the CoaguChek S device results in prosthetic heart valve thrombosis.

Authors:  Judith M D van den Brule; Johannes H Romkes; Marc A Brouwer; Luc Noyez
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-04-08

Review 2.  Venous thromboembolism in earthquake victims.

Authors:  Kazuo Inoue
Journal:  Disaster Manag Response       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar

3.  Evidence-Based Point-of-Care Device Design for Emergency and Disaster Care.

Authors:  Daniel M Mecozzi; T Keith Brock; Nam K Tran; Kristin N Hale; Gerald J Kost
Journal:  Point Care       Date:  2010-06-01

4.  Benefits of a mobile, point-of-care anticoagulation therapy management program.

Authors:  James M Gill; Mark K Landis
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  2002-11

5.  What's the Point? How Point-of-Care STI Tests Can Impact Infected Patients.

Authors:  Jill Huppert; Elizabeth Hesse; Charlotte A Gaydos
Journal:  Point Care       Date:  2010-03-01

6.  Point-of-care monitoring of anticoagulant therapy by rural community pharmacists: description of successful outcomes.

Authors:  Shane L Jackson; Gregory M Peterson; Murray House; Timothy Bartlett
Journal:  Aust J Rural Health       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.662

7.  Unsuspected coagulopathy rarely prevents IV thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  N S Rost; S Masrur; M A Pervez; A Viswanathan; L H Schwamm
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Point-of-care method for total white cell count: an evaluation of the HemoCue WBC device.

Authors:  A Osei-Bimpong; C Jury; R McLean; S M Lewis
Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Nucleated red blood cells in the blood of medical intensive care patients indicate increased mortality risk: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Axel Stachon; Elmar Segbers; Tim Holland-Letz; Reiner Kempf; Steffen Hering; Michael Krieg
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Point-of-care testing for disasters: needs assessment, strategic planning, and future design.

Authors:  Gerald J Kost; Kristin N Hale; T Keith Brock; Richard F Louie; Nicole L Gentile; Tyler K Kitano; Nam K Tran
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.935

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Recent Developments in Magnetic Diagnostic Systems.

Authors:  Hakho Lee; Tae-Hyun Shin; Jinwoo Cheon; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  A Pharmacist-Led Point-of-Care INR Clinic: Optimizing Care in a Family Health Team Setting.

Authors:  Jennifer Rossiter; Gursharan Soor; Deanna Telner; Babak Aliarzadeh; Jennifer Lake
Journal:  Int J Family Med       Date:  2013-12-12

3.  Prospective Comparison of Point-of-Care Device and Standard Analyzer for Monitoring of International Normalized Ratio in Outpatient Oral Anticoagulant Clinic.

Authors:  Bushra Moiz; Anila Rashid; Muhammad Hasan; Lena Jafri; Ahmed Raheem
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2018-01-28       Impact factor: 2.389

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.