Literature DB >> 23843686

Analytic, Computational, and Approximate Forms for Ratios of Noncentral and Central Gaussian Quadratic Forms.

Hae-Young Kim1, Matthew J Gribbin, Keith E Muller, Douglas J Taylor.   

Abstract

Many useful statistics equal the ratio of a possibly noncentral chi-square to a quadratic form in Gaussian variables with all positive weights. Expressing the density and distribution function as positively weighted sums of corresponding F functions has many advantages. The mixture forms have analytic value when embedded within a more complex problem. The mixture forms also have computational value. The expansions work well with quadratic forms having few components and small degrees of freedom. A more general algorithm from earlier literature can take longer or fail to converge in the same setting. Many approximations have been suggested for the problem. a positively weighted noncentral quadratic form can always have two moments matched to a noncentral chi-square. For a single quadratic form, the noncentral form performs neither uniformly more or less accurately than older approximations. The approach also gives a noncentral F approximation for any ratio of a positively weighted noncentral form to a positively weighted central quadratic form. The method provides better accuracy for noncentral ratios than approximations based on a single chi-square. The accuracy suffices for many practical applications, such as power analysis, even with few degrees of freedom. Naturally the approximation proves much faster and simpler to compute than any exact method. Embedding the approximation in analytic expressions provides simple forms which correctly guarantee only positive values have nonzero probabilities, and also automatically reduce to partially or fully exact results when either quadratic form has only one term.

Keywords:  Cumulative distribution function; Mixture distribution; Noncentral F

Year:  2006        PMID: 23843686      PMCID: PMC3704188          DOI: 10.1198/106186006X112954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Graph Stat        ISSN: 1061-8600            Impact factor:   2.302


  3 in total

1.  Exact test size and power of a Gaussian error linear model for an internal pilot study.

Authors:  C S Coffey; K E Muller
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components.

Authors:  F E SATTERTHWAITE
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1946-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  EXACT DISTRIBUTIONS OF INTRACLASS CORRELATION AND CRONBACH'S ALPHA WITH GAUSSIAN DATA AND GENERAL COVARIANCE.

Authors:  Emily O Kistner; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.500

  3 in total
  8 in total

1.  Global hypothesis testing for high-dimensional repeated measures outcomes.

Authors:  Yueh-Yun Chi; Matthew Gribbin; Yvonne Lamers; Jesse F Gregory; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Avoiding bias in mixed model inference for fixed effects.

Authors:  Matthew J Gurka; Lloyd J Edwards; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Power calculation for overall hypothesis testing with high-dimensional commensurate outcomes.

Authors:  Yueh-Yun Chi; Matthew J Gribbin; Jacqueline L Johnson; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Internal pilot design for balanced repeated measures.

Authors:  Xinrui Zhang; Keith E Muller; Maureen M Goodenow; Yueh-Yun Chi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Approximating the Geisser-Greenhouse sphericity estimator and its applications to diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Meagan E Clement-Spychala; David Couper; Hongtu Zhu; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 0.582

6.  Signal detection with spectrum windows.

Authors:  Harri Saarnisaari; Johanna Vartiainen
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-07-22

7.  A power approximation for the Kenward and Roger Wald test in the linear mixed model.

Authors:  Sarah M Kreidler; Brandy M Ringham; Keith E Muller; Deborah H Glueck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Confidence regions for repeated measures ANOVA power curves based on estimated covariance.

Authors:  Matthew J Gribbin; Yueh-Yun Chi; Paul W Stewart; Keith E Muller
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 4.615

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.