Literature DB >> 23843676

Proportional mean residual life model for right-censored length-biased data.

Kwun Chuen Gary Chan1, Ying Qing Chen, Chong-Zhi Di.   

Abstract

To study disease association with risk factors in epidemiologic studies, cross-sectional sampling is often more focused and less costly for recruiting study subjects who have already experienced initiating events. For time-to-event outcome, however, such a sampling strategy may be length biased. Coupled with censoring, analysis of length-biased data can be quite challenging, due to induced informative censoring in which the survival time and censoring time are correlated through a common backward recurrence time. We propose to use the proportional mean residual life model of Oakes & Dasu (Biometrika77, 409-10, 1990) for analysis of censored length-biased survival data. Several nonstandard data structures, including censoring of onset time and cross-sectional data without follow-up, can also be handled by the proposed methodology.

Keywords:  Biased sampling; Bivariate survival data; Proportional hazards model; Renewal process

Year:  2012        PMID: 23843676      PMCID: PMC3635658          DOI: 10.1093/biomet/ass049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrika        ISSN: 0006-3444            Impact factor:   2.445


  7 in total

1.  Statistics; servant of all sciences.

Authors:  J NEYMAN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1955-09-02       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The accelerated failure time model under biased sampling.

Authors:  Micha Mandel; Ya'akov Ritov
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Nonparametric estimation for length-biased and right-censored data.

Authors:  Chiung-Yu Huang; Jing Qin
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.445

4.  Analyzing Length-biased Data with Semiparametric Transformation and Accelerated Failure Time Models.

Authors:  Yu Shen; Jing Ning; Jing Qin
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  Semiparametric regression in size-biased sampling.

Authors:  Ying Qing Chen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Statistical models for prevalent cohort data.

Authors:  M C Wang; R Brookmeyer; N P Jewell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Statistical methods for analyzing right-censored length-biased data under cox model.

Authors:  Jing Qin; Yu Shen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 2.571

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Rank-based testing of equal survivorship based on cross-sectional survival data with or without prospective follow-up.

Authors:  Kwun Chuen Gary Chan; Jing Qin
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Commentary: Alignment of time scales and joint models.

Authors:  Kwun Chuen Gary Chan
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 3.  Nonparametric and semiparametric regression estimation for length-biased survival data.

Authors:  Yu Shen; Jing Ning; Jing Qin
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Survival analysis without survival data: connecting length-biased and case-control data.

Authors:  Kwun Chuen Gary Chan
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.445

Review 5.  Model diagnostics for the proportional hazards model with length-biased data.

Authors:  Chi Hyun Lee; Jing Ning; Yu Shen
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Analysis of combined incident and prevalent cohort data under a proportional mean residual life model.

Authors:  Chi Hyun Lee; Jing Ning; Richard J Kryscio; Yu Shen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 2.373

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.