BACKGROUND: The diagnostic accuracy of three faecal egg count techniques (Kato-Katz, McMaster and FLOTAC) to assess albendazole efficacy against soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infections was compared. METHODS: The study is registered with Current Controlled Trials [identifier: ISRCTN90088840]. During September-November 2009, 304 school-aged children on Pemba Island, Tanzania, were screened and those infected with Ascaris lumbricoides, hookworm or Trichuris trichiura were treated with a single dose of albendazole (400 mg). Twenty-one days post-treatment, children provided a single stool sample which was examined using the same diagnostic methods. All stool samples were divided into two aliquots and one was fixed in 5% formalin and examined using FLOTAC and McMaster approximately 6 months after collection. RESULTS: Using fresh stool samples, comparable prevalences were demonstrated for the three methods at baseline (90-92.2% for T. trichiura, 41.1-52.8% for hookworm, 32.9-37.2% for A. lumbricoides); FLOTAC was the most sensitive method at baseline and follow-up. Albendazole showed high cure rate (CR) against A. lumbricoides (90-97%), moderate CR against hookworm (63-72%) and very low CR against T. trichiura (6-9%), regardless of the technique used. Egg counts (eggs per gram) at baseline were similar for A. lumbricoides and for hookworm among the three methods, and higher using McMaster and Kato-Katz compared with FLOTAC for T. trichiura. All methods were similar for hookworm and A. lumbricoides egg reduction rate (ERR) estimation, but Kato-Katz indicated a significantly higher ERR than McMaster and FLOTAC for T. trichiura. Preserved stool samples revealed consistently lower FECs at baseline and follow-up for all STHs. CONCLUSION: Further development and validation of standard protocols for anthelminthic drug efficacy evaluation must be pursued.
BACKGROUND: The diagnostic accuracy of three faecal egg count techniques (Kato-Katz, McMaster and FLOTAC) to assess albendazole efficacy against soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infections was compared. METHODS: The study is registered with Current Controlled Trials [identifier: ISRCTN90088840]. During September-November 2009, 304 school-aged children on Pemba Island, Tanzania, were screened and those infected with Ascaris lumbricoides, hookworm or Trichuris trichiura were treated with a single dose of albendazole (400 mg). Twenty-one days post-treatment, children provided a single stool sample which was examined using the same diagnostic methods. All stool samples were divided into two aliquots and one was fixed in 5% formalin and examined using FLOTAC and McMaster approximately 6 months after collection. RESULTS: Using fresh stool samples, comparable prevalences were demonstrated for the three methods at baseline (90-92.2% for T. trichiura, 41.1-52.8% for hookworm, 32.9-37.2% for A. lumbricoides); FLOTAC was the most sensitive method at baseline and follow-up. Albendazole showed high cure rate (CR) against A. lumbricoides (90-97%), moderate CR against hookworm (63-72%) and very low CR against T. trichiura (6-9%), regardless of the technique used. Egg counts (eggs per gram) at baseline were similar for A. lumbricoides and for hookworm among the three methods, and higher using McMaster and Kato-Katz compared with FLOTAC for T. trichiura. All methods were similar for hookworm and A. lumbricoides egg reduction rate (ERR) estimation, but Kato-Katz indicated a significantly higher ERR than McMaster and FLOTAC for T. trichiura. Preserved stool samples revealed consistently lower FECs at baseline and follow-up for all STHs. CONCLUSION: Further development and validation of standard protocols for anthelminthic drug efficacy evaluation must be pursued.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diagnostic accuracy; Drug efficacy; FLOTAC; Kato–Katz; McMaster; Soil-transmitted helminths
Authors: Giuseppe Cringoli; Maria P Maurelli; Bruno Levecke; Antonio Bosco; Jozef Vercruysse; Jürg Utzinger; Laura Rinaldi Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Luciano Gualdieri; Monica Piemonte; Settimia Alfano; Rita Maffei; Maria Elena Della Pepa; Laura Rinaldi; Marilena Galdiero; Massimiliano Galdiero; Giuseppe Cringoli Journal: Parasitol Res Date: 2015-12-28 Impact factor: 2.289
Authors: Miguel M Cabada; Jose L Malaga; Alejandro Castellanos-Gonzalez; Kelli A Bagwell; Patrick A Naeger; Hayley K Rogers; Safa Maharsi; Maryann Mbaka; A Clinton White Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2016-11-07 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Tom Pennance; M Inês Neves; Bonnie L Webster; Charlotte M Gower; Stefanie Knopp; Iddi Simba Khamis; Shaali M Ame; Said M Ali; Muriel Rabone; Aidan Emery; Fiona Allan; Mtumweni Ali Muhsin; Khamis Rashid Suleiman; Fatama Kabole; Martin Walker; David Rollinson; Joanne P Webster Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2022-10-10
Authors: Beatrice Barda; Marco Albonico; Dora Buonfrate; Shaali M Ame; Said Ali; Benjamin Speich; Jennifer Keiser Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Martha Lopez; Maria Luisa Morales; Monisha Konana; Paige Hoyer; Roberto Pineda-Reyes; Arthur Clinton White; Hector Hugo Garcia; Andres Guillermo Lescano; Eduardo Gotuzzo; Miguel Mauricio Cabada Journal: Pathog Glob Health Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Hesham M Al-Mekhlafi; Tengku Shahrul Anuar; Ebtesam M Al-Zabedi; Mohamed T Al-Maktari; Mohammed A K Mahdy; Abdulhamid Ahmed; Atiya A Sallam; Wan Ariffin Abdullah; Norhayati Moktar; Johari Surin Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2014-08-15 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Victor S Njom; Tim Winks; Oumu Diallo; Ann Lowe; Jerzy Behnke; Mark J Dickman; Ian Duce; Iain Johnstone; David J Buttle Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2021-06-05 Impact factor: 3.876