Literature DB >> 23843476

Continuous blood pressure response at different intensities in leg press exercise.

Nuno M F de Sousa1, Rodrigo F Magosso2, Thiago Dipp3, Rodrigo D M Plentz3, Runer A Marson4, Arlindo N Montagnolli2, Raul A S Martins5, Sérgio E A Perez6, Vilmar Baldissera2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Generally, the evaluation of the blood pressure response to resistance exercise has been limited to the evaluation of discontinuous casual blood pressure monitoring, often measured at the end of the exercise.
DESIGN: To continuously evaluate the blood pressure response at different intensities of leg press exercise with the same duration and number of repetitions.
METHODS: Seven normotensive healthy men performed an incremental test on the leg press machine at relative intensities of one repetition maximum (1RM). The blood pressure and heart rate were measured simultaneously to the incremental exercise by a photoplethysmographic method.
RESULTS: The mean ± SD peak values of the heart rate, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were obtained on 70% of 1RM and were 145 ± 20 bpm, 113.1 ± 15.4 mmHg, and 192.4 ± 20.0 mmHg, respectively. The SBP was characterized by a decrease followed by an increase during the sets of exercise. The decrease in the SBP was 12-22 mmHg and took approximately 25 seconds to reach the minimum value before the increase. It was observed for all participants in most of the intensities. The rate of increase in the SBP was not statistically different between the intensities.
CONCLUSIONS: Both duration and intensity of exercise have an impact on the blood pressure response. Above 30% of 1RM, the SBP decreases in approximately 20 seconds and starts to increase until the end of the set of leg press exercise. © The European Society of Cardiology 2013 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diastolic blood pressure; finapres; photoplethysmographic; resistance exercise; systolic blood pressure

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23843476     DOI: 10.1177/2047487313497863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol        ISSN: 2047-4873            Impact factor:   7.804


  3 in total

1.  Interrepetition Rest Set Lacks the V-Shape Systolic Pressure Response Advantage during Resistance Exercise.

Authors:  Xian Mayo; Eliseo Iglesias-Soler; J Derek Kingsley; Xurxo Dopico
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-01

2.  Non-periodized and Daily Undulating Periodized Resistance Training on Blood Pressure of Older Women.

Authors:  Hélio J Coelho-Júnior; Ivan de Oliveira Gonçalves; Niels O S Câmara; Marco A Cenedeze; Reury F Bacurau; Ricardo Yukio Asano; Jeferson Santana; Erico Caperuto; Marco C Uchida; Bruno Rodrigues
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Hypotensive Responses of Reciprocal Supersets versus Traditional Resistance Training in Apparently Healthy Men.

Authors:  Claudio M Bentes; Pablo B Costa; Victor G Corrêa Neto; Roberto Simão; Gabriel A Paz; Marianna F Maia; Tiago Figueiredo; Gabriel R Neto; Jefferson S Novaes; Humberto Miranda
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2017-05-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.