Literature DB >> 23843068

Intestinal fistula after magnets ingestion.

Maurício Macedo, Manoel Carlos Prieto Velhote, Rafael Forti Maschietto, Renata Dejtiar Waksman.   

Abstract

Accidental ingestion of magnetic foreign bodies has become more common due to increased availability of objects and toys with magnetic elements. The majority of them traverse the gastrointestinal system spontaneously without complication. However, ingestion of multiple magnets may require surgical resolution. The case of an 18-month girl who developed an intestinal fistula after ingestion of two magnets is reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23843068      PMCID: PMC4872901          DOI: 10.1590/s1679-45082013000200018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)        ISSN: 1679-4508


INTRODUCTION

Ingestion of foreign bodies is a common complaint in pediatric emergency services. In the United States, the annual incidence is over 100 thousand patients, and more than 80% of the cases are observed in the pediatric population(. Most cases of foreign body ingestion occur in children aged between six months and three years. Among the artifacts more frequently ingested, coins, small toy parts, batteries and, less often, magnetic pieces, stand out. The object usually goes to the stomach, passes by the pyloric sphincter and ileocecal valve, and is naturally eliminated. In about 80% of cases the object is spontaneously eliminated; 20% require endoscopy, and complications occur in less than 1% and demand surgical procedures(. Endoscopy is always indicated when the foreign body is in the esophagus or stomach and it is a long and sharp object, or multiple magnets, batteries, or if it stays in stomach, regardless of its size(. Surgery is reserved for complicated cases or when the object has not been eliminated. The most common complications are obstruction and perforation of the gastrointestinal tract. Ingestion of magnetic pieces is still not frequent in Brazil; however it has distinct characteristics from other foreign bodies that should be known. In this report, we describe a complication related to ingestion of magnetic objects.

CASE REPORT

Seven days ago, an 18-month-old girl ingested two magnets, on the same day, which were used to attach photographs on a metallic surface. The patient was asymptomatic in this period, but the objects were not eliminated in stools. Upon physical examination, the abdomen was flacid, not painful on palpation and percussion, liver and spleen were not palpable, there were no tumors, and bowel sounds were normal. The radiograph taken on the day she ingested the pieces revealed artifacts in the abdominal cavity. Nevertheless, in radiological monitoring, the objects were in the same position in the mesogastrium. It was observed that the two magnetic pieces were together (Figure 1); thus, surgical treatment was chosen. Videolaparoscopy was initially indicated to locate the pieces. During the procedure it was noted that two intestinal loops were attached to and blocked by epyplon. When blockage was removed, the two magnets were seen in different bowel segments, and were 20cm away from each other; they were adhered together and there was a fistula between them (Figure 2). The bowel was exteriorized through the umbilicus, enterectomy was performed, the magnets removed and enteroenteral anastomosis was made. The patient progressed well and was discharged on the third postoperative day.
Figure 1

Simple abdominal radiograph showing a foreign body

Figure 2

Intraoperative aspect showing one of magnets and the intestinal perforation

DISCUSSION

Accidental ingestion of magnetic foreign bodies by children occur increasingly more often due to availability of objects and toys containing magnets(. Ingestion of magnets and its complications are scarcely discussed in the literature. Most articles published are from Korea, Japan and China, where magnets are sold to treat muscle pain and improve circulation(. Magnets are also utilized as parts of toys and bijoux(. The ingestion of a single magnet, small enough to go through the gastrointestinal tract, poses no additional risk. Likewise, the ingestion of two or more magnets presents no risk if the pieces are ingested simultaneously and if they adhere to each other. The complications occur when two or more pieces go through separately, in distinct segments, and one attracts the other when they are close. In this case, compression may lead to ischemia of the intestinal loop, resulting in complications, such as perforation and peritonitis( or formation of fistula(, intestinal obstruction( and small bowel volvulus(. Once ingestion is diagnosed, if the objects are no longer in the stomach, patients must be submitted to strict observation, since the radiological differentiation of a single or more magnets can be subtle or even impossible to be determined. Monitoring is made by radiographs when there are no signs of intestinal obstruction or perforation. The radiographic images should be taken after ingestion and repeated 48 to 72 hours later to assess progression of the object. If during monitoring the pieces are still in the same position, patients should be submitted to surgery. Parents should be oriented to prevent such accidents. Healthcare professionals must be aware of the potential risks and possible complications of magnet ingestion, which should be treated differently from ingestion of other types of objects due to high associated morbidity.
  10 in total

1.  Magnet ingestion in children--a potentially sticky issue?

Authors:  Anil Thomas George; Sandeep Motiwale
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Bowel perforations induced by multiple magnet ingestion.

Authors:  Byung Kook Lee; Hyun Ho Ryu; Jeong Mi Moon; Kyung Woon Jeung
Journal:  Emerg Med Australas       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.151

3.  An intestinal volvulus caused by multiple magnet ingestion: an unexpected risk in children.

Authors:  Akihiro Nui; Toshinori Hirama; Tadashi Katsuramaki; Tomomi Maeda; Makoto Meguro; Minoru Nagayama; Takashi Matsuno; Tomohiro Mizumoto; Koichi Hirata
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Magnets in the stomach.

Authors:  David A Berg; McDara G Tynan; Harsh Grewal
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Foreign body ingestion and aspiration.

Authors:  Marisa C Louie; Stuart Bradin
Journal:  Pediatr Rev       Date:  2009-08

6.  Ingestion of magnets: innocent in solitude, harmful in groups.

Authors:  Barbara E Wildhaber; Claude Le Coultre; Bernard Genin
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 7.  Pediatric foreign bodies and their management.

Authors:  Marsha Kay; Robert Wyllie
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2005-06

8.  Small bowel complication caused by magnetic foreign body ingestion of children: two case reports.

Authors:  Jae Hee Chung; Jeong Soo Kim; Young Tack Song
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  An intestinal fistula in a 3-year-old child caused by the ingestion of magnets: report of a case.

Authors:  M Honzumi; C Shigemori; H Ito; Y Mohri; H Urata; T Yamamoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Toy magnet ingestion in children: revising the algorithm.

Authors:  James Butterworth; Brad Feltis
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.545

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Bowel obstruction in entero-colic fistula associated with magnet ingestion in children at the Amazonas countryside.

Authors:  Douglas Dallas Muniz Dias; Wolfram W S Amorim; Juan E R Rodriguez; Júlia F Cauduro; Samuel P Pena; Darlla S Dias; Didney I Dias; David L Dias; Cinira S C Lima; Tiago M Cardoso
Journal:  AME Case Rep       Date:  2019-11-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.