PURPOSE: To compare optic disc size among Caucasian, Chinese, African, Filipino and Hispanic subjects recruited from a university-based general ophthalmology clinic. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, optic disc size was calculated from fundus photographs. Differences in age, sex and spherical equivalent among the ethnic groups were examined with either Kruskal--Wallis test or Chi-square test. Ethnic differences in optic disc size were evaluated with linear mixed-effects regression models that adjusted for age, sex, spherical equivalent, glaucoma status, lens status and use of both eyes in the same subject. RESULTS: Five hundred and seventy-four eyes of 305 subjects were analyzed. The mean and standard deviation of the optic disc size were 2.16 ± 0.41 mm(2) for Caucasian, 2.30 ± 0.56 mm(2) for Chinese, 2.31 ± 0.41 mm(2) for Filipino, 2.38 ± 0.40 mm(2) for African and 2.40 ± 0.38 mm(2) for Hispanic subjects. Age and spherical equivalent differed among the ethnic groups by Kruskal--Wallis test (p < 0.05). Sex differed among the ethnic groups by Chi-square test (p < 0.05). Ethnic differences in optic disc size were not observed among African, Hispanic, Filipino and Chinese subjects in linear mixed-effects regression analyses (p > 0.05). However, Caucasian differed from the other ethnicities in linear mixed-effects regression analyses (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Optic disc size was significantly smaller in Caucasian compared to the other ethnic groups. Optic disc size differences among non-Caucasian ethnic groups were not significant.
PURPOSE: To compare optic disc size among Caucasian, Chinese, African, Filipino and Hispanic subjects recruited from a university-based general ophthalmology clinic. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, optic disc size was calculated from fundus photographs. Differences in age, sex and spherical equivalent among the ethnic groups were examined with either Kruskal--Wallis test or Chi-square test. Ethnic differences in optic disc size were evaluated with linear mixed-effects regression models that adjusted for age, sex, spherical equivalent, glaucoma status, lens status and use of both eyes in the same subject. RESULTS: Five hundred and seventy-four eyes of 305 subjects were analyzed. The mean and standard deviation of the optic disc size were 2.16 ± 0.41 mm(2) for Caucasian, 2.30 ± 0.56 mm(2) for Chinese, 2.31 ± 0.41 mm(2) for Filipino, 2.38 ± 0.40 mm(2) for African and 2.40 ± 0.38 mm(2) for Hispanic subjects. Age and spherical equivalent differed among the ethnic groups by Kruskal--Wallis test (p < 0.05). Sex differed among the ethnic groups by Chi-square test (p < 0.05). Ethnic differences in optic disc size were not observed among African, Hispanic, Filipino and Chinese subjects in linear mixed-effects regression analyses (p > 0.05). However, Caucasian differed from the other ethnicities in linear mixed-effects regression analyses (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Optic disc size was significantly smaller in Caucasian compared to the other ethnic groups. Optic disc size differences among non-Caucasian ethnic groups were not significant.
Authors: C Gustavo De Moraes; James T Murphy; Chad M Kaplan; Jeremy J Reimann; Alon Skaat; Dana M Blumberg; Lama Al-Aswad; George A Cioffi; Christopher A Girkin; Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb; Linda Zangwill; Jeffrey M Liebmann Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Xikun Han; Kaiah Steven; Ayub Qassim; Henry N Marshall; Cameron Bean; Michael Tremeer; Jiyuan An; Owen M Siggs; Puya Gharahkhani; Jamie E Craig; Alex W Hewitt; Maciej Trzaskowski; Stuart MacGregor Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Linda Yi-Chieh Poon; Hussein Antar; Edem Tsikata; Rong Guo; Georgia Papadogeorgou; Madeline Freeman; Ziad Khoueir; Ramon Lee; Eric Shieh; Huseyin Simavli; Christian John Que; Johannes F de Boer; Teresa C Chen Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Andrew J Nelson; Ryuna Chang; Vivian LeTran; Brian Vu; Bruce Burkemper; Zhongdi Chu; Ali Fard; Amir Kashani; Benjamin Xu; Ruikang Wang; Rohit Varma; Grace M Richter Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Massimo A Fazio; John K Johnstone; Brandon Smith; Lan Wang; Christopher A Girkin Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Mark Christopher; Kenichi Nakahara; Christopher Bowd; James A Proudfoot; Akram Belghith; Michael H Goldbaum; Jasmin Rezapour; Robert N Weinreb; Massimo A Fazio; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Gustavo De Moraes; Hiroshi Murata; Kana Tokumo; Naoto Shibata; Yuri Fujino; Masato Matsuura; Yoshiaki Kiuchi; Masaki Tanito; Ryo Asaoka; Linda M Zangwill Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 3.283