| Literature DB >> 23841094 |
Nohra E Beltran1, Laura E Garcia, Mario Garcia-Lorenzana.
Abstract
The gastric mucosa ischemic tissular damage plays an important role in critical care patients' outcome, because it is the first damaged tissue by compensatory mechanism during shock. The aim of the study is to relate bioimpedance changes with tissular damage level generated by ischemia by means of confocal endomicroscopy and light microscopy. Bioimpedance of the gastric mucosa and confocal images were obtained from Wistar male rats during basal and ischemia conditions. They were anesthetized, and stain was applied (fluorescein and/or acriflavine). The impedance spectroscopy catheter was inserted and then confocal endomicroscopy probe. After basal measurements and biopsy, hepatic and gastric arteries clamping induced ischemia. Finally, pyloric antrum tissue was preserved in buffered formaldehyde (10%) for histology processing using light microscopy. Confocal images were equalized, binarized, and boundary defined, and infiltrations were quantified. Impedance and infiltrations increased with ischemia showing significant changes between basal and ischemia conditions (P < 0.01). Light microscopy analysis allows detection of general alterations in cellular and tissular integrity, confirming gastric reactance and confocal images quantification increments obtained during ischemia.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23841094 PMCID: PMC3697240 DOI: 10.1155/2013/824682
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Stomach exhibition for greater curvature incision.
Figure 2Hepatic and gastric arteries occlusion for ischemia generation.
Impedance parameters for acriflavine staining. Difference in the mean parameters by condition was analyzed using the Student's t-test. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
| Impedance parameter | Basal | Ischemia |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 75.4 ± 1.7 | 91.9 ± 1.4 | <0.01* |
|
| 34.3 ± 0.7 | 35.9 ± 0.5 | 0.053 |
|
| 7.4 ± 0.5 | 11.5 ± 0.4 | <0.01* |
|
| 8.9 ± 0.2 | 18.5 ± 0.1 | 0.037 |
*Statistically significant (P < 0.01).
Impedance parameters for fluorescein staining. Difference in the mean parameters by condition was analyzed using the Student's t-test. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
| Impedance parameter | Basal | Ischemia |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 62.9 ± 3.1 | 99.1 ± 3.4 | <0.01* |
|
| 31.5 ± 1.5 | 39.2 ± 1.6 | <0.01* |
|
| 3.1 ± 0.3 | 6.7 ± 0.4 | <0.01* |
|
| 10.9 ± 0.8 | 17.5 ± 0.8 | <0.01* |
*Statistically significant (P < 0.01).
Impedance parameters for the combination of fluorescein and acriflavine. Difference in the mean parameters by condition was analyzed using the Student's t-test. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
| Impedance parameter | Basal | Ischemia |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 70.3 ± 2.1 | 91.3 ± 1.6 | <0.01* |
|
| 34.7 ± 0.6 | 35.6 ± 0.5 | 0.278 |
|
| 7.6 ± 0.4 | 11.7 ± 0.3 | <0.01* |
|
| 9.4 ± 0.4 | 16.3 ± 0.3 | <0.01* |
*Statistically significant (P < 0.01).
Figure 3Confocal images comparison between nonequalized and equalized images, after edge enhancement for different staining.
Figure 4Number of imaging infiltrations according to staining type (right square), after binarization processing.
Relationship between impedance parameters and confocal images infiltration numbers. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
|
|
| Infiltration number | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acriflavine | |||
| Basal | 75.4 ± 1.7 | 7.4 ± 0.5 | 4294 |
| Ischemia | 91.9 ± 1.4 | 11.5 ± 0.4 | 4423 |
| Fluorescein | |||
| Basal | 62.9 ± 3.1 | 3.1 ± 0.3 | 2349 |
| Ischemia | 99.1 ± 3.4 | 6.7 ± 0.4 | 4150 |
| Acriflavine and fluorescein | |||
| Basal | 70.3 ± 2.1 | 7.6 ± 0.4 | 691 |
| Ischemia | 91.3 ± 1.6 | 11.7 ± 0.3 | 4169 |
Figure 5Hematoxylin and eosin stained histological sections of rat pyloric antrum tissue under basal and ischemia conditions. (A) and (E) basal condition: normal epithelium (e), lamina propria (L), and gastric glands (G). (B), (C), (D), and (F) ischemia condition: some epithelial cells show histological features of necrosis (▲), and the initial phases of the acute inflammatory response: leukocyte infiltration (→), vascular congestion (∗), and epithelium integrity lost (∇) ((A), (B), (C), and (D) magnification ×100, Bar = 100 μm; H-E) ((E) and (F) magnification ×400, bar = 25 μm).