Literature DB >> 23839775

Prognostic value of the Glasgow Prognostic Score in metastatic colorectal cancer in the era of anti-EGFR therapies.

Johann Dréanic1, Marianne Maillet, Marion Dhooge, Olivier Mir, Catherine Brezault, François Goldwasser, Stanislas Chaussade, Romain Coriat.   

Abstract

The Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), combination of C-reactive protein and albumin, has proven its prognostic value in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients receiving conventional cytotoxic therapy. More recently, anti-EGFR therapies have been validated in mCRC and roll forward the patients' overall survival (OS). We aimed to evaluate the prognostic accuracy of the GPS in patients receiving anti-EGFR therapy in addition to conventional chemotherapy. From January 2007 to February 2012, consecutive mCRC patients who received 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab were included in the present analysis. Patients were eligible for the study if they met the following criteria: advanced pathologically proven MCRC, age >18 years, adequate renal function (creatinine clearance >40 ml/min), C-reactive protein and albumin and performance status evaluation before treatment initiation. A total of 49 patients received cetuximab plus 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy (colon, n = 34; rectum, n = 15) and were treated with a median follow-up of 35 months (16.5-74.7). Median age was 48 years old. In addition to cetuximab, patients received oxaliplatin- (n = 34, 60%) or irinotecan (n = 15, 30%)-based chemotherapy. At time of diagnosis, 55, 29 and 16% of patients had a GPS of 0 (n = 27), 1 (n = 14) and 2 (n = 8), respectively. Fifty-five, 29 and 14 % of patients add one, two or ≥3 metastatic sites, respectively. Considering two groups (GPS = 0 and GPS ≥1), median progression-free survivals were significantly different (p = 0.0084). Median OS in the GPS 0, 1 and 2 groups were 38.2, 14 and 12.1 months, respectively (p = 0.0093). The results of the present study confirm that the GPS is still a simple and effective prognostic factor in the era of cetuximab therapy in mCRC patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23839775     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-013-0656-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  13 in total

Review 1.  Advanced colorectal cancer: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  E Van Cutsem; J Oliveira
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Longitudinal study of body cell mass depletion and the inflammatory response in cancer patients.

Authors:  D C McMillan; H R Scott; W S Watson; T Preston; R Milroy; C S McArdle
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.900

Review 3.  The systemic inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score: a decade of experience in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Donald C McMillan
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 12.111

4.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  M M Oken; R H Creech; D C Tormey; J Horton; T E Davis; E T McFadden; P P Carbone
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.339

5.  Cancer statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Deepa Naishadham; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Evaluation of the seventh edition of the tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) classification for colon cancer in two nationwide registries of the United States and Japan.

Authors:  Y Hashiguchi; K Hase; K Kotake; H Ueno; E Shinto; H Mochizuki; J Yamamoto; K Sugihara
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  The relationship between the presence and site of cancer, an inflammation-based prognostic score and biochemical parameters. Initial results of the Glasgow Inflammation Outcome Study.

Authors:  M J Proctor; D Talwar; S M Balmar; D S J O'Reilly; A K Foulis; P G Horgan; D S Morrison; D C McMillan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  An inflammation-based prognostic score (mGPS) predicts cancer survival independent of tumour site: a Glasgow Inflammation Outcome Study.

Authors:  M J Proctor; D S Morrison; D Talwar; S M Balmer; D S J O'Reilly; A K Foulis; P G Horgan; D C McMillan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Prognostic value of performance status assessed by patients themselves, nurses, and oncologists in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M Ando; Y Ando; Y Hasegawa; K Shimokata; H Minami; K Wakai; Y Ohno; S Sakai
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-11-30       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Comparison of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) with performance status (ECOG) in patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  L M Forrest; D C McMillan; C S McArdle; W J Angerson; D J Dunlop
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

1.  Predictive effects of bilirubin on response of colorectal cancer to irinotecan-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Qian-Qian Yu; Hong Qiu; Ming-Sheng Zhang; Guang-Yuan Hu; Bo Liu; Liu Huang; Xin Liao; Qian-Xia Li; Zhi-Huan Li; Xiang-Lin Yuan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Role of systemic inflammation scores in pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tommaso Claudio Mineo; Federico Tacconi
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  The application of the Palliative Prognostic Index, charlson comorbidity index, and Glasgow Prognostic Score in predicting the life expectancy of patients with hematologic malignancies under palliative care.

Authors:  Wen-Chi Chou; Chen-Yi Kao; Po-Nan Wang; Hung Chang; Hung-Ming Wang; Pei-Hung Chang; Kun-Yun Yeh; Yu-Shin Hung
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.234

4.  Prognostic value of the Glasgow prognostic score in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 9,839 patients.

Authors:  Xin Lu; Wanying Guo; Wei Xu; Xuelei Zhang; Zhijie Shi; Leizhen Zheng; Wenzhao Zhao
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  The impact of the Glasgow Prognostic Score on survival in second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients with BRAF V600E mutation.

Authors:  Seiichiro Mitani; Hiroya Taniguchi; Keiji Sugiyama; Toshiki Masuishi; Kazunori Honda; Yukiya Narita; Shigenori Kadowaki; Takashi Ura; Masashi Ando; Masahiro Tajika; Yasushi Yatabe; Kei Muro
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2019-01-12       Impact factor: 8.168

6.  Anti-epidermal or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor as first-line metastatic colorectal cancer in modified Glasgow prognostic score 2' patients.

Authors:  Johann Dréanic; Marion Dhooge; Maximilien Barret; Catherine Brezault; Olivier Mir; Stanislas Chaussade; Romain Coriat
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 12.910

7.  β1, 4-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase III modulates cancer stemness through EGFR signaling pathway in colon cancer cells.

Authors:  Mei-Ieng Che; John Huang; Ji-Shiang Hung; Yo-Chuen Lin; Miao-Juei Huang; Hong-Shiee Lai; Wen-Ming Hsu; Jin-Tung Liang; Min-Chuan Huang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-06-15

Review 8.  Prognostic Role of Glasgow Prognostic Score in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mu-Xing Li; Xin-Yu Bi; Zhi-Yu Li; Zhen Huang; Yue Han; Jian-Guo Zhou; Jian-Jun Zhao; Ye-Fan Zhang; Hong Zhao; Jian-Qiang Cai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.