BACKGROUND: Metastatic spinal cord compression from prostate cancer is a debilitating disease causing neurological deficits, mechanical instability, and intractable pain. Surgical management may improve quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To define postoperative outcomes and explore associations with prolonged survival for patients with metastatic prostate cancer. METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews were performed of all patients undergoing spinal surgery for metastatic cancer from June 1, 2002 to August 31, 2011. Patient demographics, surgical details, adjuvant therapies, outcomes, complications, and postoperative survival were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with prostate cancer underwent surgery at a median age of 65 years (range, 46-82 years). After surgery, 93% of patients had preserved or improved neurological status, 56% of nonambulatory patients recovered ambulation, 43% of incontinent patients recovered continence, and 23% experienced complications. Postoperative Frankel grades were significantly improved by at least 1 letter grade at 1 month (P = .03). The median analgesic and steroid usage was significantly lower up to 3 months and 6 months postoperatively, respectively (P = .007, .005). Median survival following surgery was 10.2 months, and patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer had a shorter median survival than those with hormone-naïve disease (9.8 vs 40 months). Better preoperative performance status was an independent predictor of survival (P = .02). Younger age (P = .005) and instrumentation greater than 7 spinal levels (P = .03) were associated with complications. CONCLUSION: Spinal surgery for prostate metastases improves neurological function and decreases analgesic requirements. Our findings support surgical intervention for carefully selected patients, and knowledge of preoperative hormone sensitivity and performance status may help with risk stratification.
BACKGROUND: Metastatic spinal cord compression from prostate cancer is a debilitating disease causing neurological deficits, mechanical instability, and intractable pain. Surgical management may improve quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To define postoperative outcomes and explore associations with prolonged survival for patients with metastatic prostate cancer. METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews were performed of all patients undergoing spinal surgery for metastatic cancer from June 1, 2002 to August 31, 2011. Patient demographics, surgical details, adjuvant therapies, outcomes, complications, and postoperative survival were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with prostate cancer underwent surgery at a median age of 65 years (range, 46-82 years). After surgery, 93% of patients had preserved or improved neurological status, 56% of nonambulatory patients recovered ambulation, 43% of incontinentpatients recovered continence, and 23% experienced complications. Postoperative Frankel grades were significantly improved by at least 1 letter grade at 1 month (P = .03). The median analgesic and steroid usage was significantly lower up to 3 months and 6 months postoperatively, respectively (P = .007, .005). Median survival following surgery was 10.2 months, and patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer had a shorter median survival than those with hormone-naïve disease (9.8 vs 40 months). Better preoperative performance status was an independent predictor of survival (P = .02). Younger age (P = .005) and instrumentation greater than 7 spinal levels (P = .03) were associated with complications. CONCLUSION: Spinal surgery for prostate metastases improves neurological function and decreases analgesic requirements. Our findings support surgical intervention for carefully selected patients, and knowledge of preoperative hormone sensitivity and performance status may help with risk stratification.
Authors: Patricia L Zadnik; Lee Hwang; Derek G Ju; Mari L Groves; Jackson Sui; Alp Yurter; Timothy F Witham; Ali Bydon; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Daniel M Sciubba Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Muhammad Omar Chohan; Sweena Kahn; Gustav Cederquist; Anne S Reiner; Joseph Schwab; Ilya Laufer; Mark Bilsky Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Michelle J Clarke; Camilo A Molina; Daryl R Fourney; Charles G Fisher; Ziya L Gokaslan; Meic H Schmidt; Laurence D Rhines; Michael G Fehlings; Ilya Laufer; Shreyaskumar R Patel; Y Raja Rampersaud; Jeremy Reynolds; Dean Chou; Chetan Bettegowda; Ehud Mendel; Michael H Weber; Daniel M Sciubba Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2017-06-01