BACKGROUND: Acral melanoma (AM) is an unusual malignancy with poor survival. This study defines a cohort of patients, treated at a single institution, and the factors associated with survival and comparison with nonacral cutaneous melanoma (NACM). METHODS: All patients with AM presenting from 1995 to 2010 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Analysis of clinicopathologic features of AM associated with disease-specific survival (DSS) was performed. A stratified, stage-matched survival analysis compared the outcome of 281 acral to 843 extremity NACM patients. RESULTS: A total of 281 AM patients (170 volar, 111 subungual) were identified. Pathologic stage (p < 0.001), ulceration (p < 0.001), Breslow thickness (p < 0.001), and a positive sentinel lymph node (p < 0.001) were found to be poor prognostic indicators associated with DSS. In stage-matched analysis, AM had a worse DSS compared with NACM (hazard ratio 1.8; 95 % CI 1.2-2.7; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest, single-institution series describing the characteristics and outcomes of AM. AM tumors exhibit aggressive histopathologic features associated with a poorer survival outcome. AM patients have an inferior survival than extremity NACM when matched for stage, perhaps reflecting inherent alterations in tumor biology. This warrants further investigation into the differences between acral and cutaneous melanoma.
BACKGROUND:Acral melanoma (AM) is an unusual malignancy with poor survival. This study defines a cohort of patients, treated at a single institution, and the factors associated with survival and comparison with nonacral cutaneous melanoma (NACM). METHODS: All patients with AM presenting from 1995 to 2010 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Analysis of clinicopathologic features of AM associated with disease-specific survival (DSS) was performed. A stratified, stage-matched survival analysis compared the outcome of 281 acral to 843 extremity NACM patients. RESULTS: A total of 281 AM patients (170 volar, 111 subungual) were identified. Pathologic stage (p < 0.001), ulceration (p < 0.001), Breslow thickness (p < 0.001), and a positive sentinel lymph node (p < 0.001) were found to be poor prognostic indicators associated with DSS. In stage-matched analysis, AM had a worse DSS compared with NACM (hazard ratio 1.8; 95 % CI 1.2-2.7; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest, single-institution series describing the characteristics and outcomes of AM. AM tumors exhibit aggressive histopathologic features associated with a poorer survival outcome. AM patients have an inferior survival than extremity NACM when matched for stage, perhaps reflecting inherent alterations in tumor biology. This warrants further investigation into the differences between acral and cutaneous melanoma.
Authors: Dale Han; Gang Han; Monica T Duque; Steven Morrison; Stanley P Leong; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; John Vetto; Richard White; Schlomo Schneebaum; Barbara Pockaj; Nicola Mozzillo; Vernon K Sondak; Jonathan S Zager Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Douglas B Johnson; Chengwei Peng; Richard G Abramson; Fei Ye; Shilin Zhao; Jedd D Wolchok; Jeffrey A Sosman; Richard D Carvajal; Charlotte E Ariyan Journal: Oncologist Date: 2015-05-11
Authors: Iwei Yeh; Eric Jorgenson; Ling Shen; Mengshu Xu; Jeffrey P North; A Hunter Shain; David Reuss; Hong Wu; William A Robinson; Adam Olshen; Andreas von Deimling; Pui-Yan Kwok; Boris C Bastian; Maryam M Asgari Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Alexander N Shoushtari; Rodrigo R Munhoz; Deborah Kuk; Patrick A Ott; Douglas B Johnson; Katy K Tsai; Suthee Rapisuwon; Zeynep Eroglu; Ryan J Sullivan; Jason J Luke; Tara C Gangadhar; April K S Salama; Varina Clark; Clare Burias; Igor Puzanov; Michael B Atkins; Alain P Algazi; Antoni Ribas; Jedd D Wolchok; Michael A Postow Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Priyanka V Gumaste; Nathaniel H Fleming; Ines Silva; Richard L Shapiro; Russell S Berman; Judy Zhong; Iman Osman; Jennifer A Stein Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Deborah Kuk; Alexander N Shoushtari; Christopher A Barker; Katherine S Panageas; Rodrigo R Munhoz; Parisa Momtaz; Charlotte E Ariyan; Mary Sue Brady; Daniel G Coit; Kita Bogatch; Margaret K Callahan; Jedd D Wolchok; Richard D Carvajal; Michael A Postow Journal: Oncologist Date: 2016-06-10
Authors: C A Castaneda; C Torres-Cabala; M Castillo; V Villegas; S Casavilca; L Cano; J Sanchez; J Dunstan; G Calderon; M De La Cruz; J M Cotrina; H L Gomez; R Galvez; J Abugattas Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2017-06-02 Impact factor: 3.405