BACKGROUND: The neonatal and pediatric antimicrobial point prevalence survey (PPS) of the Antibiotic Resistance and Prescribing in European Children project (http://www.arpecproject.eu/) aims to standardize a method for surveillance of antimicrobial use in children and neonates admitted to the hospital within Europe. This article describes the audit criteria used and reports overall country-specific proportions of antimicrobial use. An analytical review presents methodologies on antimicrobial use. METHODS: A 1-day PPS on antimicrobial use in hospitalized children was organized in September 2011, using a previously validated and standardized method. The survey included all inpatient pediatric and neonatal beds and identified all children receiving an antimicrobial treatment on the day of survey. Mandatory data were age, gender, (birth) weight, underlying diagnosis, antimicrobial agent, dose and indication for treatment. Data were entered through a web-based system for data-entry and reporting, based on the WebPPS program developed for the European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption project. RESULTS: There were 2760 and 1565 pediatric versus 1154 and 589 neonatal inpatients reported among 50 European (n = 14 countries) and 23 non-European hospitals (n = 9 countries), respectively. Overall, antibiotic pediatric and neonatal use was significantly higher in non-European (43.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 41.3-46.3% and 39.4%; 95% CI: 35.5-43.4%) compared with that in European hospitals (35.4; 95% CI: 33.6-37.2% and 21.8%; 95% CI: 19.4-24.2%). Proportions of antibiotic use were highest in hematology/oncology wards (61.3%; 95% CI: 56.2-66.4%) and pediatric intensive care units (55.8%; 95% CI: 50.3-61.3%). CONCLUSIONS: An Antibiotic Resistance and Prescribing in European Children standardized web-based method for a 1-day PPS was successfully developed and conducted in 73 hospitals worldwide. It offers a simple, feasible and sustainable way of data collection that can be used globally.
BACKGROUND: The neonatal and pediatric antimicrobial point prevalence survey (PPS) of the Antibiotic Resistance and Prescribing in European Children project (http://www.arpecproject.eu/) aims to standardize a method for surveillance of antimicrobial use in children and neonates admitted to the hospital within Europe. This article describes the audit criteria used and reports overall country-specific proportions of antimicrobial use. An analytical review presents methodologies on antimicrobial use. METHODS: A 1-day PPS on antimicrobial use in hospitalized children was organized in September 2011, using a previously validated and standardized method. The survey included all inpatient pediatric and neonatal beds and identified all children receiving an antimicrobial treatment on the day of survey. Mandatory data were age, gender, (birth) weight, underlying diagnosis, antimicrobial agent, dose and indication for treatment. Data were entered through a web-based system for data-entry and reporting, based on the WebPPS program developed for the European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption project. RESULTS: There were 2760 and 1565 pediatric versus 1154 and 589 neonatal inpatients reported among 50 European (n = 14 countries) and 23 non-European hospitals (n = 9 countries), respectively. Overall, antibiotic pediatric and neonatal use was significantly higher in non-European (43.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 41.3-46.3% and 39.4%; 95% CI: 35.5-43.4%) compared with that in European hospitals (35.4; 95% CI: 33.6-37.2% and 21.8%; 95% CI: 19.4-24.2%). Proportions of antibiotic use were highest in hematology/oncology wards (61.3%; 95% CI: 56.2-66.4%) and pediatric intensive care units (55.8%; 95% CI: 50.3-61.3%). CONCLUSIONS: An Antibiotic Resistance and Prescribing in European Children standardized web-based method for a 1-day PPS was successfully developed and conducted in 73 hospitals worldwide. It offers a simple, feasible and sustainable way of data collection that can be used globally.
Authors: Andrea Hahn; Tsuyoshi Fukuda; David Hahn; Tomoyuki Mizuno; Robert W Frenck; Alexander A Vinks Journal: Pharmacogenomics Date: 2016-04-05 Impact factor: 2.533
Authors: Katja Weiss; Arne Simon; Norbert Graf; Jakob Schöpe; Joachim Oertel; Stefan Linsler Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2016-11-07 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: J M Lestner; A Versporten; K Doerholt; A Warris; E Roilides; M Sharland; J Bielicki; H Goossens Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-11-17 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Kevin J Downes; Andrea Hahn; Jason Wiles; Joshua D Courter; Alexander A Vinks Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 5.283
Authors: Tamara van Donge; Marc Pfister; Julia Bielicki; Chantal Csajka; Frederique Rodieux; John van den Anker; Aline Fuchs Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Katharina Kreitmeyr; Ulrich von Both; Alenka Pecar; Johannes P Borde; Rafael Mikolajczyk; Johannes Huebner Journal: Infection Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 3.553
Authors: A Lo Vecchio; L Lancella; C Tagliabue; C De Giacomo; S Garazzino; M Mainetti; L Cursi; E Borali; M V De Vita; E Boccuzzi; L Castellazzi; S Esposito; A Guarino Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 3.267