BACKGROUND: Prediagnostic steps in suspected metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) rely on clinical chemical methods other than enzyme assays. We report a new diagnostic method which evaluates changes in the spectrum of molecular types of sulfatides (3-O-sulfogalactosyl ceramides) in MLD urine. METHODS: The procedure allows isolation of urinary sulfatides by solid-phase extraction on DEAE-cellulose membranes, transportation of a dry membrane followed by elution and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) analysis in the clinical laboratory. Major sulfatide isoforms are normalized to the least variable component of the spectrum, which is the indigenous C18:0 isoform. This procedure does not require the use of specific internal standards and minimizes errors caused by sample preparation and measurement. RESULTS: Urinary sulfatides were analyzed in a set of 21 samples from patients affected by sulfatidosis. The combined abundance of the five most elevated isoforms, C22:0, C22:0-OH, C24:0, C24:1-OH, and C24:0-OH sulfatides, was found to give the greatest distinction between MLD-affected patients and a control group. CONCLUSIONS: The method avoids transportation of liquid urine samples and generates stable membrane-bound sulfatide samples that can be stored at ambient temperature. MS/MS sulfatide profiling targeted on the most MLD-representative isoforms is simple with robust results and is suitable for screening.
BACKGROUND: Prediagnostic steps in suspected metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) rely on clinical chemical methods other than enzyme assays. We report a new diagnostic method which evaluates changes in the spectrum of molecular types of sulfatides (3-O-sulfogalactosyl ceramides) in MLD urine. METHODS: The procedure allows isolation of urinary sulfatides by solid-phase extraction on DEAE-cellulose membranes, transportation of a dry membrane followed by elution and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) analysis in the clinical laboratory. Major sulfatide isoforms are normalized to the least variable component of the spectrum, which is the indigenous C18:0 isoform. This procedure does not require the use of specific internal standards and minimizes errors caused by sample preparation and measurement. RESULTS: Urinary sulfatides were analyzed in a set of 21 samples from patients affected by sulfatidosis. The combined abundance of the five most elevated isoforms, C22:0, C22:0-OH, C24:0, C24:1-OH, and C24:0-OH sulfatides, was found to give the greatest distinction between MLD-affected patients and a control group. CONCLUSIONS: The method avoids transportation of liquid urine samples and generates stable membrane-bound sulfatide samples that can be stored at ambient temperature. MS/MSsulfatide profiling targeted on the most MLD-representative isoforms is simple with robust results and is suitable for screening.
Keywords:
ASA; CV; DEAE; DEAE-cellulose membrane; DUS; Diethylaminoethyl; Dry urinary samples; IPN; Isoforms; MLD; MS/MS; PTFE; Psap-d; S/N; SRM; Screening for metachromatic leukodystrophy; Tandem mass spectrometry; Urinary sulfatide; arylsulfatase A; coefficient of variation; dry urinary sample; isoform profile number (ratio of the sum of the major five isoforms and the C18:0 sulfatide); metachromatic leukodystrophy; polytetrafluoroethylene; prosaposin deficiency; selected reaction monitoring; signal to noise ratio; tandem mass spectrometry
Authors: H Hulková; M Cervenková; J Ledvinová; M Tochácková; M Hrebícek; H Poupetová; A Befekadu; L Berná; B C Paton; K Harzer; A Böör; F Smíd; M Elleder Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2001-04-15 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: L Kuchar; J Rotková; B Asfaw; J Lenfeld; D Horák; L Korecká; Z Bílková; J Ledvinová Journal: Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom Date: 2010-08-30 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Mariana Barcenas; Teryn R Suhr; C Ronald Scott; Frantisek Turecek; Michael H Gelb Journal: Clin Chim Acta Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 3.786
Authors: E Ellen Jones; Shaalee Dworski; Daniel Canals; Josefina Casas; Gemma Fabrias; Drew Schoenling; Thierry Levade; Chadrick Denlinger; Yusuf A Hannun; Jeffrey A Medin; Richard R Drake Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2014-08-08 Impact factor: 6.986