Literature DB >> 23838105

Comparative tolerability and harms of individual statins: a study-level network meta-analysis of 246 955 participants from 135 randomized, controlled trials.

Huseyin Naci1, Jasper Brugts, Tony Ades.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to estimate the comparative harms of individual statins using both placebo-controlled and active-comparator trials. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We systematically reviewed randomized trials evaluating different statins in participants with and without cardiovascular disease. We performed random-effects pairwise and network meta-analyses to quantify the relative harms of individual statins. We included 55 two-armed placebo-controlled and 80 two- or multiarmed active-comparator trials including 246,955 individuals. According to pairwise meta-analyses, individual statins were not different than control in terms of myalgia, creatine kinase elevation, cancer, and discontinuations because of adverse events. Statins as a class resulted in significantly higher odds of diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.16) and transaminase elevations (odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.84) compared with control. When individual statins were compared in network meta-analyses, there were numerous statistically detectable differences, favoring simvastatin and pravastatin. According to dose-level comparisons, individual statins resulted in higher odds of discontinuations with higher doses of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin. Similarly, higher doses of atorvasatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, and simvastatin were associated with higher odds of transaminase elevations. Simvastatin at its highest doses was associated with creatine kinase elevations (odds ratio, 4.14; 95% credible interval, 1.08-16.24). Meta-regression analyses adjusting for study-level age at baseline, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, and publication year did not explain heterogeneity. There was no detectable inconsistency in the network.
CONCLUSIONS: As a class, adverse events associated with statin therapy are not common. Statins are not associated with cancer risk but do result in a higher odds of diabetes mellitus. Among individual statins, simvastatin and pravastatin seem safer and more tolerable than other statins.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; adverse effects; cardiovascular agents; cardiovascular disease; coronary disease; meta-analysis; statins

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23838105     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.000071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  80 in total

Review 1.  The strategies to control prostate cancer by chemoprevention approaches.

Authors:  Harold Ting; Gagan Deep; Chapla Agarwal; Rajesh Agarwal
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 2.  Treatment of cholesterol in the elderly: statins and beyond.

Authors:  John C LaRosa
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 3.  Efficacy and safety of pitavastatin versus simvastatin: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Zhen Jiang; Ren Rong Gong; Li Qiu; Qian Wang; Mi Su; Xiao Juan Liu; Min Shan Hu; Jia Lin; Ding Zhi Fang
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Statins and mortality: the untold story.

Authors:  Michael S Kostapanos; Moses S Elisaf
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Statin-prescribing trends for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Felicity Brown; Alexander Singer; Alan Katz; Gerald Konrad
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Adverse reactions to dietary supplements containing red yeast rice: assessment of cases from the Italian surveillance system.

Authors:  Gabriela Mazzanti; Paola Angela Moro; Emanuel Raschi; Roberto Da Cas; Francesca Menniti-Ippolito
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor subtype 2 signaling in endothelial senescence-associated functional impairments and inflammation.

Authors:  Jiawei Zhao; Dante Garcia; Allison Gartung; Menq-Jer Lee
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.113

8.  Statin-induced liver injury in an area endemic for hepatitis B virus infection: risk factors and outcome analysis.

Authors:  Li Yueh Wang; Yi-Shin Huang; Chin-Lin Perng; Bryan Huang; Han-Chieh Lin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Treatment Options for Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms.

Authors:  Ulrich Laufs; Hubert Scharnagl; Martin Halle; Eberhard Windler; Matthias Endres; Winfried März
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 10.  Approach to Statin Use in 2016: an Update.

Authors:  P Elliott Miller; Seth S Martin
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.