Grith Eng1, Michael B Stoltenberg, Marcin Szkudlarek, Pierre N Bouchelouche, Robin Christensen, Henning Bliddal, Else Marie Bartels. 1. Department of Rheumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital at Køge, Lykkebækvej 1, DK-4600 Køge, Denmark; Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital at Køge, Lykkebækvej 1, DK-4600 Køge, Denmark; The Parker Institute, Department of Rheumatology, Copenhagen University Hospitals at Frederiksberg and Bispebjerg, DK-2000 Copenhagen F, Denmark. Electronic address: eng@dadlnet.dk.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To summarize the empirical evidence regarding the effect of treatment intensification on clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with one of the TNF-α-inhibitors, adalimumab, etanercept or infliximab. METHODS: A systematic search of the bibliographic databases Embase, Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane Central identifying articles concerning treatment with adalimumab, etanercept or infliximab in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis exposed to dose increase or shortening of dosing intervals was performed. Longitudinal cohorts, both clinical trials and observational studies, were included. ACR and EULAR response criteria and DAS28 were the preferred outcome measures. RESULTS: Out of 1135 records, eleven studies were included in the final evidence synthesis. One article concerned all the three TNF-α-inhibitors, eight used infliximab, one adalimumab and one etanercept. According to GRADE, evidence was weakened in particular by the lack of control groups, and for treatment intensification with adalimumab and etanercept, no conclusions could be drawn. With infliximab, two trials of high quality revealed contradictory results, but six studies described an improved clinical outcome following intensified treatment strategies. Some studies (2/2) also indicated that for infliximab, frequency increase was superior to dose increase. CONCLUSIONS: Available studies indicate that intensifying treatment with infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis patients, preferably by increasing the frequency of drug administration, may lead to improved clinical outcome in some patients, but the evidence is weak. There is an urgent need for prospectively designed cohort studies to be able to draw a final conclusion.
OBJECTIVES: To summarize the empirical evidence regarding the effect of treatment intensification on clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with one of the TNF-α-inhibitors, adalimumab, etanercept or infliximab. METHODS: A systematic search of the bibliographic databases Embase, Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane Central identifying articles concerning treatment with adalimumab, etanercept or infliximab in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis exposed to dose increase or shortening of dosing intervals was performed. Longitudinal cohorts, both clinical trials and observational studies, were included. ACR and EULAR response criteria and DAS28 were the preferred outcome measures. RESULTS: Out of 1135 records, eleven studies were included in the final evidence synthesis. One article concerned all the three TNF-α-inhibitors, eight used infliximab, one adalimumab and one etanercept. According to GRADE, evidence was weakened in particular by the lack of control groups, and for treatment intensification with adalimumab and etanercept, no conclusions could be drawn. With infliximab, two trials of high quality revealed contradictory results, but six studies described an improved clinical outcome following intensified treatment strategies. Some studies (2/2) also indicated that for infliximab, frequency increase was superior to dose increase. CONCLUSIONS: Available studies indicate that intensifying treatment with infliximab in rheumatoid arthritispatients, preferably by increasing the frequency of drug administration, may lead to improved clinical outcome in some patients, but the evidence is weak. There is an urgent need for prospectively designed cohort studies to be able to draw a final conclusion.
Authors: Stanley B Cohen; Joel M Kremer; Kimberly J Dandreo; George W Reed; Robert Magner; Ying Shan; Shelly Kafka; Raphael J DeHoratius; Lorie Ellis; Dennis Parenti Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2019-05-02 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Chamaida Plasencia; Teresa Jurado; Alejandro Villalba; Diana Peitedado; Maria Teresa López Casla; Laura Nuño; María Gema Bonilla; Ana Martínez-Feito; Emilio Martín-Mola; Dora Pascual-Salcedo; Alejandro Balsa Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2015-10-08
Authors: Pedro Santos-Moreno; Guillermo Sánchez; Danny Gómez; Juan Bello-Gualtero; Carlos Castro Journal: J Clin Rheumatol Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 3.517
Authors: Silje W Syversen; Guro L Goll; Kristin K Jørgensen; Inge C Olsen; Øystein Sandanger; Johanna E Gehin; David J Warren; Joseph Sexton; Cato Mørk; Jørgen Jahnsen; Tore K Kvien; Nils Bolstad; Espen A Haavardsholm Journal: Trials Date: 2020-01-06 Impact factor: 2.279