Hinrich J D Heuer1, Robert E Boykin1, Charles J Petit2, Juliane Hardt3, Peter J Millett4. 1. Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA. 2. Cascade Orthopedics & Sports Medicine Center P.C., The Dalles, OR, USA. 3. Institute of Social Medicine, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany. 4. Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA. Electronic address: drmillett@thesteadmanclinic.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Nonoperative treatment is standard for most diaphyseal clavicle fractures, but recent studies have demonstrated improved outcomes with operative treatment of displaced fractures. The objectives of this diagnostic study were to assess agreement of orthopaedic surgeons regarding their treatment preferences for diaphyseal clavicle fractures and to compare them with recent recommendations. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement in treatment decisions were hypothesized to be only slight. METHODS: Anonymized case vignettes of 50 acute diaphyseal clavicle fractures including medical history, physical examination findings, and radiographs were independently reviewed by 32 orthopaedic surgeons from the United States. Four treatment options were offered and decisions were compared with current treatment recommendations. Interobserver agreement was calculated using Fleiss' kappa coefficient. Average intraobserver agreement for surgeons who completed a retest review (minimum interval of 8 weeks) was calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-two surgeons completed the first round of reviewing and 27 completed the retest (mean interval, 22 weeks). Interobserver agreement was overall fair (kappa = 0.36) and moderate (kappa = 0.56) when operative options were compared with nonoperative options. Median intraobserver agreement was 74% for the 4 treatment options offered and 84% in deciding on operative vs. nonoperative means. Concordance with recent recommendations for operative vs. nonoperative treatment was seen in 91% of decisions (median). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Recent recommendations appear to have been adopted by a selected subgroup of U.S. orthopaedic surgeons, showing a surprisingly high median concordance of 91% in this study. However, only fair to moderate interobserver and intraobserver agreement was present, leaving potential for improvement.
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Nonoperative treatment is standard for most diaphyseal clavicle fractures, but recent studies have demonstrated improved outcomes with operative treatment of displaced fractures. The objectives of this diagnostic study were to assess agreement of orthopaedic surgeons regarding their treatment preferences for diaphyseal clavicle fractures and to compare them with recent recommendations. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement in treatment decisions were hypothesized to be only slight. METHODS: Anonymized case vignettes of 50 acute diaphyseal clavicle fractures including medical history, physical examination findings, and radiographs were independently reviewed by 32 orthopaedic surgeons from the United States. Four treatment options were offered and decisions were compared with current treatment recommendations. Interobserver agreement was calculated using Fleiss' kappa coefficient. Average intraobserver agreement for surgeons who completed a retest review (minimum interval of 8 weeks) was calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-two surgeons completed the first round of reviewing and 27 completed the retest (mean interval, 22 weeks). Interobserver agreement was overall fair (kappa = 0.36) and moderate (kappa = 0.56) when operative options were compared with nonoperative options. Median intraobserver agreement was 74% for the 4 treatment options offered and 84% in deciding on operative vs. nonoperative means. Concordance with recent recommendations for operative vs. nonoperative treatment was seen in 91% of decisions (median). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Recent recommendations appear to have been adopted by a selected subgroup of U.S. orthopaedic surgeons, showing a surprisingly high median concordance of 91% in this study. However, only fair to moderate interobserver and intraobserver agreement was present, leaving potential for improvement.
Keywords:
Agreement; Survey Study using Experts/Diagnostic Study (reliability); clavicle fractures; concordance; interobserver; intraobserver; treatment preferences
Authors: Adilson Sanches de Oliveira; Bruno Braga Roberto; Mario Lenza; Guilherme Figueiredo Pintan; Benno Ejnisman; Breno Schor; Eduardo da Frota Carrera; Joel Murachovsky Journal: Einstein (Sao Paulo) Date: 2017 Jul-Sep
Authors: A Lam; S A Boenerjous; Y Lo; J M Abzug; J Kurian; M C Liszewski; D E Sanderson; J M Scholnick; B H Taragin; J A Gomez; N Y Otsuka; R Hanstein Journal: J Child Orthop Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 1.548
Authors: Pedro José Labronici; Fernando Claudino Dos Santos Filho; Tales Bregalda Reis; Robinson Esteves Santos Pires; Adriano Fernando Mendes Junior; Kodi Edson Kojima Journal: Rev Bras Ortop Date: 2017-07-08
Authors: Cara H Lai; Malcolm R DeBaun; Noelle Van Rysselberghe; Geoffrey D Abrams; Robin N Kamal; Julius A Bishop; Michael J Gardner Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 2.884