AIMS: Aspirin achieves its antithrombotic effect through inactivation of cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-1, thereby preventing generation of thromboxane (TX)A2 from arachidonic acid (AA). The reported prevalence of aspirin "resistance" varies significantly and is usually based on platelet function tests (PFTs) that use AA-induced platelet reactivity as a surrogate measure of the effect of aspirin, rather than specific assessment of its effect on its therapeutic target (ie, COX-1 inhibition). The reported rates are not only assay specific but also condition specific, with particularly high rates (up to 70%) previously reported in the stroke population. We investigated whether pharmacological responses to aspirin can be reliably determined from a functional test of AA-induced whole-blood clotting. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective study included 35 patients admitted with ischemic stroke and commenced on 300 mg aspirin. AA-induced whole-blood clotting was measured using short thrombelastography, a previously extensively validated near-patient PFT. Serum TXB2 and inflammatory biomarkers were also measured. The prevalence of apparent aspirin resistance measured using AA was high (range from 49% to 67%). However, serum [TXB2] was consistently low, thereby confirming adequate inhibition of COX-1 by aspirin. Mean inflammatory biomarker levels were elevated throughout. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that although COX-1 activity is adequately and consistently suppressed by aspirin in stroke patients, this effect is not reliably indicated by whole-blood clotting in response to AA. These data help to explain why the reported prevalence of aspirin resistance in stroke from studies employing AA-induced platelet reactivity is high and cast doubt on the veracity of such reports.
AIMS: Aspirin achieves its antithrombotic effect through inactivation of cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-1, thereby preventing generation of thromboxane (TX)A2 from arachidonic acid (AA). The reported prevalence of aspirin "resistance" varies significantly and is usually based on platelet function tests (PFTs) that use AA-induced platelet reactivity as a surrogate measure of the effect of aspirin, rather than specific assessment of its effect on its therapeutic target (ie, COX-1 inhibition). The reported rates are not only assay specific but also condition specific, with particularly high rates (up to 70%) previously reported in the stroke population. We investigated whether pharmacological responses to aspirin can be reliably determined from a functional test of AA-induced whole-blood clotting. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective study included 35 patients admitted with ischemic stroke and commenced on 300 mg aspirin. AA-induced whole-blood clotting was measured using short thrombelastography, a previously extensively validated near-patient PFT. Serum TXB2 and inflammatory biomarkers were also measured. The prevalence of apparent aspirin resistance measured using AA was high (range from 49% to 67%). However, serum [TXB2] was consistently low, thereby confirming adequate inhibition of COX-1 by aspirin. Mean inflammatory biomarker levels were elevated throughout. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that although COX-1 activity is adequately and consistently suppressed by aspirin in strokepatients, this effect is not reliably indicated by whole-blood clotting in response to AA. These data help to explain why the reported prevalence of aspirin resistance in stroke from studies employing AA-induced platelet reactivity is high and cast doubt on the veracity of such reports.