BACKGROUND: Currently, in the field of general anesthesia, balanced anesthesia in combination with analgesic, hypnotic, and muscle relaxant is commonly used. Remifentanil is the standard analgesic used in balanced anesthesia, and has contributed greatly to reduce the physical stress of the patient during surgery. We compared the stress response suppression effect of remifentanil by measuring stress hormones in 2 groups treated with different analgesic doses in orthopedic surgery using a tourniquet. METHODS:Twenty patients were randomly divided into 2 groups (10 patients each) undergoingmaintenance of general anesthesia with 0.25 μg/kg/min remifentanil and sevoflurane (Group A) and 1.0 μg/kg/min remifentanil and sevoflurane (Group B). Hemodynamic changes, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol, antidiuretic hormone (ADH), adrenaline (Ad), noradrenaline (NAd), dopamine (DOA), insulin, and blood glucose were measured at the initiation of general anesthesia,10 minutes after the initiation of tourniquet application, and immediately before and 10 minutes after the completion of tourniquet application. RESULTS: ACTH, CORTISOL, ADH, AD, AND NAD LEVELS IN GROUP B WERE SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER (ACTH AND CORTISOL: P < 0.01, ADH, Ad, and NAd: P < 0.05) than those in Group A. No significant differences were noted in DOA, insulin, or blood glucose levels between the groups. CONCLUSION: Anesthesia management with high-dose remifentanil (1.0 μg/kg/min) suppressed intraoperative tourniquet pain-induced stress hormone release, suggesting its usefulness in stabilizing hemodynamics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: JMA-IIA00094.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Currently, in the field of general anesthesia, balanced anesthesia in combination with analgesic, hypnotic, and muscle relaxant is commonly used. Remifentanil is the standard analgesic used in balanced anesthesia, and has contributed greatly to reduce the physical stress of the patient during surgery. We compared the stress response suppression effect of remifentanil by measuring stress hormones in 2 groups treated with different analgesic doses in orthopedic surgery using a tourniquet. METHODS: Twenty patients were randomly divided into 2 groups (10 patients each) undergoing maintenance of general anesthesia with 0.25 μg/kg/min remifentanil and sevoflurane (Group A) and 1.0 μg/kg/min remifentanil and sevoflurane (Group B). Hemodynamic changes, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol, antidiuretic hormone (ADH), adrenaline (Ad), noradrenaline (NAd), dopamine (DOA), insulin, and blood glucose were measured at the initiation of general anesthesia,10 minutes after the initiation of tourniquet application, and immediately before and 10 minutes after the completion of tourniquet application. RESULTS:ACTH, CORTISOL, ADH, AD, AND NAD LEVELS IN GROUP B WERE SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER (ACTH AND CORTISOL: P < 0.01, ADH, Ad, and NAd: P < 0.05) than those in Group A. No significant differences were noted in DOA, insulin, or blood glucose levels between the groups. CONCLUSION: Anesthesia management with high-dose remifentanil (1.0 μg/kg/min) suppressed intraoperative tourniquet pain-induced stress hormone release, suggesting its usefulness in stabilizing hemodynamics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: JMA-IIA00094.
In orthopedic surgery using a tourniquet application (TA), tourniquet pain increases as the duration of avascularization becomes prolonged, and intraoperative hemodynamic variations increase, such as elevations in blood pressure and tachycardia, which may make anesthesia management difficult. Generally, tourniquet pain-induced stress reactions, such as elevations in blood pressure, undergo symptomatic treatment, such as the administration of additional analgesics and antihypertensive drugs, but anesthesia management with a low risk of adverse events is necessary to reduce the risk of complications. When strong stressful stimulation, such as tourniquet pain, is expected, anesthesia management at a higher analgesic level than a conventional level may facilitate anesthesia with stable hemodynamics, which is gentler on the patient’s body.Remifentanil can be readily administered at a sufficient analgesic dose during surgery because the analgesic dose is highly adjustable and the drug does not accumulate due to a short context-sensitive half-time [1,2].In this study, we investigated the stress response suppression effect of remifentanil by measuring and comparing the hemodynamics and stress hormone levels of patients treated at 2 different analgesic doses in orthopedic surgery using a TA.
Anesthetic protocol. *Case of hemodynamic suppression (bradycardia, hypotension). - systolic blood pressure (SBP) 80 mmHG continued for 1 min: administration of phenylephrine 0.1 mg or ephedrine 8 mg. - Heart rate (HR) 40 beats/min continued for 1 min: administration of atropine 0.5 mg. * Case in stress response (tachycardia, hypertension). - administration of remifentanil 1 μg/kg bolus (0.1 mL per 10 kg body weight). LOC, loss of consciousness. INTB, tracheal intubation. IV-PCA, intravenous patient controlled analgesia.
Anesthetic protocol. *Case of hemodynamic suppression (bradycardia, hypotension). - systolic blood pressure (SBP) 80 mmHG continued for 1 min: administration of phenylephrine 0.1 mg or ephedrine 8 mg. - Heart rate (HR) 40 beats/min continued for 1 min: administration of atropine 0.5 mg. * Case in stress response (tachycardia, hypertension). - administration of remifentanil 1 μg/kg bolus (0.1 mL per 10 kg body weight). LOC, loss of consciousness. INTB, tracheal intubation. IV-PCA, intravenous patient controlled analgesia.
Results
There were no significant differences in the following surgical background items: age, gender, height, body weight, ASA physical status, duration of anesthesia, operation time, duration of TA, infusion volume, and blood loss. No significant difference was noted in intraoperative total infusion volume, but intraoperative urine volume in Group B (740.0 ± 247.6 mL) was significantly larger than that in A (250.0 ± 150.9 mL) (P < 0.01) The average consumption of sevoflurane in Group A (1.3 ± 0.1%) was significantly higher than that in B (1.0 ± 0.1%) (P < 0.01) (Tables 1 and 2). Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) in Group A was significantly higher than just before TA end (Group A: 100.4 ± 11.9, Group B: 81.6 ± 13.4 mmHg, P < 0.05). The course of the heart rate was similar in the 2 groups, showing no significant differences throughout surgery (Figure 2). There were no significant differences in the BIS value and body temperature between the groups. The highest ACTH level was noted just before TA end in Group A. In contrast, it decreased with time in Group B. A significant difference was noted between the groups just before TA end (Group A: 95.1 ± 84.2, Group B: 4.9 ± 1.6 pg/ml, P < 0.01) and 10 min after TA end (Group A: 59.7 ± 55.7, Group B: 7.7 ±10.2 pg/ml, P < 0.01). Cortisol levels were similar between the 2 groups until 10 min after TA start, but cortisol levels in Group A became higher than those in B and continued to rise thereafter. A significant difference was noted between the groups just before TA end (Group A: 12.1 ± 7.8, Group B: 4.9 ± 1.5 μg/dl, P < 0.05) and 10 min after TA end (Group A: 14.8 ± 7.8, Group B: 5.2 ± 2.4 μg/dl, P < 0.01). ADH levels rose with the avascularization time in Group A, but no rise was noted in Group B. No significant difference was noted between the groups (Figure 3). Ad levels tended to rise in both groups, but the rise in Group B was smaller than that in Group A. A significant difference was noted between the groups 10 min after TA end (Group A: 21.4 ± 23.4, Group B: 7.2 ±8.3 pg/ml, P < 0.05) and just before TA end (Group A: 137.6 ± 135.0, Group B: 35.4 ± 69.9 pg/ml, P < 0.05). The variation pattern of NAd and DOA levels was similar throughout surgery, but both levels in Group B were lower than those in Group A, but this difference was not significant (Figure 4). The variation pattern of insulin levels was similar throughout surgery, but insulin levels in Group B were lower than those in Group A. No significant difference was noted between the groups. No significant difference was noted in blood glucose levels between the groups throughout surgery (Figure 5). No nausea, vomiting, or shivering occurred after surgery in any patient. All patients safely awakened and were extubated in the operation room. Memories during surgery were confirmed the following day, based on which no intraoperative awareness was suspected in any patient of either group.
Table 1
Demografic characteristics of the study groups
Group A
Group B
P value
(0.25 μg/kg/min)
(1.0 μg/kg/min)
Number of patients
10
10
-
Gender (male/female
5/5
5/5
1.0
Age (year)
49.4 ± 27.2
45.6 ± 30.1
0.8
Height (cm)
162.9 ± 10.9
160.9 ± 10.5
0.7
Body weight (kg)
62.1 ± 10.3
60.9 ± 13.7
0.8
ASA Physical status (1/2)
5/5
6/4
0.7
Table 2
Comparison of surgery and anesthesia features between the study groups
** Urine volume and average consumption of sevoflurane were significantly higher in Group B than Group A.
Figure 2
Changes in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Changes from the baseline (ANES start) values were different (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01) between the groups using unpaired t-test. Mean value was different (# P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01) than at baseline within the same group using dunnett test. ANES start: Just before drug consumption for induction of anesthesia. TA: Tourniquet application.
Figure 3
Changes in adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol, and antidiuretic hormone (ADH). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Changes from the baseline (ANES start) values were different (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01) between the groups using unpaired t-test. Mean value was different (# P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01) than at baseline within the same group using dunnett test. ANES start: Just before drug consumption for induction of anesthesia. TA: Tourniquet application. Standard value: ACTH (7.2-63.3 pg/mL), cortisol (4.5-21.1 pg/mL), ADH (0.3-3.5 pg/mL).
Figure 4
Changes in adrenaline (Ad), noradrenaline (NAd), and dopamine (DOA). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Changes from the baseline (ANES start) values were different (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01) between the groups using unpaired t-test. Mean value was different (# P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01) than at baseline within the same group using dunnett test. ANES start: Just before drug consumption for induction of anesthesia. TA: Tourniquet application. Standard value: Ad (<100 pg/mL), NAd (140–450 pg/mL), DOA (< 20 pg/mL).
Figure 5
Changes in insulin and blood glucose. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Changes from the baseline (ANES start) values were different (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01) between the groups using unpaired t-test. Mean value was different (# P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01) than at baseline within the same group using dunnett test. ANES start: Just before drug consumption for induction of anesthesia. TA: Tourniquet application. Standard value: insulin (2.2-12.4 pg/mL), blood glucose (70–109 mg/dL).
Demografic characteristics of the study groupsComparison of surgery and anesthesia features between the study groups** Urine volume and average consumption of sevoflurane were significantly higher in Group B than Group A.Changes in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Changes from the baseline (ANES start) values were different (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01) between the groups using unpaired t-test. Mean value was different (# P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01) than at baseline within the same group using dunnett test. ANES start: Just before drug consumption for induction of anesthesia. TA: Tourniquet application.Changes in adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol, and antidiuretic hormone (ADH). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Changes from the baseline (ANES start) values were different (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01) between the groups using unpaired t-test. Mean value was different (# P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01) than at baseline within the same group using dunnett test. ANES start: Just before drug consumption for induction of anesthesia. TA: Tourniquet application. Standard value: ACTH (7.2-63.3 pg/mL), cortisol (4.5-21.1 pg/mL), ADH (0.3-3.5 pg/mL).Changes in adrenaline (Ad), noradrenaline (NAd), and dopamine (DOA). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Changes from the baseline (ANES start) values were different (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01) between the groups using unpaired t-test. Mean value was different (# P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01) than at baseline within the same group using dunnett test. ANES start: Just before drug consumption for induction of anesthesia. TA: Tourniquet application. Standard value: Ad (<100 pg/mL), NAd (140–450 pg/mL), DOA (< 20 pg/mL).Changes in insulin and blood glucose. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Changes from the baseline (ANES start) values were different (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01) between the groups using unpaired t-test. Mean value was different (# P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01) than at baseline within the same group using dunnett test. ANES start: Just before drug consumption for induction of anesthesia. TA: Tourniquet application. Standard value: insulin (2.2-12.4 pg/mL), blood glucose (70–109 mg/dL).
Discussion
The recent objective of anesthesia management is stress-free early recovery after surgery [4]. Surgical stress is closely related to catecholamine synthesis and secretion by the adrenal medulla, and an increase in catecholamine secretion has been reported to inhibit cellular immunity [5]. It has also been reported that inhibition of stress reactions prevented surgical stress-induced perioperative reductions in immune function [6].Surgical stress elevates the levels of stress hormones (ACTH, cortisol, ADH, Ad, NAd, and DOA) and inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1, IL-2, and IL-6) in the body [7]. These promote insulin resistance, gluconeogenesis, and glycolysis and impair insulin secretion, resulting in intraoperative stress-induced hyperglycemia [8]. Intraoperative hyperglycemia has been reported to be an independent risk factor of severe adverse inhospital outcomes (Odds ratio 7.2) [9] and has been suggested to influence mortality [10]. It has also been suggested that ACTH and cortisol release are involved in the development of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism [11]. Based on these findings, inhibition of stress-induced hyperglycemia and stress hormone release by intraoperative anesthesia management may be useful in improving patient outcomes. It has already been reported that stress hormone and cytokine release and intraoperative hyperglycemia were inhibited by anesthesia management using remifentanil [3,12-14]. The strong analgesic action of high-dose (1.0 μg/kg/min) remifentanil may have suppressed tourniquet pain-induced stress stimulation, stabilized circulatory dynamics, and significantly inhibited stress hormone release in our study.On the other hand, no significant difference was noted in blood glucose levels between the groups and no stress-induced hyperglycemia occurred, suggesting that insulin secretion was maintained at a higher level in Group A than that in Group B, although the difference was not significant, avoiding hyperglycemia in Group A.However, in a study in which anesthesia with sevoflurane alone and that with remifentanil and propofol anesthesia were compared in patients during open hysterectomy, stress hormone and blood glucose levels were lower in the TIVA group [9]. In a study in which 5 doses (0.25, 1.0, 2.5, and 5.0 μg/kg/min) of remifentanil were compared in pediatric patients during cardiac surgery, cortisol and glucose level elevations were suppressed in the group treated with remifentanil at 1.0 μg/kg/min or higher [3]. In our previous study in which changes in blood glucose levels during laparoscopic surgery were investigated in groups treated with remifentanil at 0.25 and 1.0 μg/kg/min [15], blood glucose levels were significantly rose in the 0.25 μg/kg/min remifentanil treatment group.These preceding studies suggest that the blood glucose level may serve as an index of surgical stress inhibition. However, the blood glucose level is influenced by various factors, and no correlation was noted between the stress hormone and blood glucose levels, suggesting that tourniquet pain and organ-injuring stress simulation are different.The increase in urine volume observed in Group B (1.0 μg/kg/min) may have been due to the suppression of ADH secretion because ADH secretion levels were high in Group A (0.25 μg/kg/min) and there was no difference in infusion volumes between the 2 groups.
Conclusion
Anesthesia management with high-dose remifentanil (1.0 μg/kg/min) suppressed tourniquet pain-induced stress hormone release during orthopedic surgery of the limbs using a TA, suggesting its usefulness in stabilizing hemodynamics. This protocol should also be evaluated in patients treated with various surgeries. It may be difficult to accurately evaluate intraoperative stress unless stress hormones can be measured simply in an operation room at a low cost. As an alternative, the blood glucose level and urine volume may serve as indices of the analgesic effect because these can be measured simply during surgery.
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Authors’ contributions
TS: Designing the study, giving informed consent to patients, collecting and analyzing data, writing the manuscript. WM: Collecting data. YT: Collecting data. HI: Collecting data. MT: Analyzing data. YK: Intellectual contribution and supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Pre-publication history
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/13/14/prepub
Authors: Alexandre Ouattara; Patrick Lecomte; Yannick Le Manach; Marc Landi; Sophie Jacqueminet; Igor Platonov; Nicolas Bonnet; Bruno Riou; Pierre Coriat Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: John B Ammori; Matthew Sigakis; Michael J Englesbe; Michael O'Reilly; Shawn J Pelletier Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2007-06-15 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Ji WooK Kim; A Ran Lee; Eun Sun Park; Min Su Yun; Sung Won Ryu; Uk Gwan Kim; Dong Hee Kang; Ju Deok Kim Journal: Anesth Pain Med (Seoul) Date: 2021-10-14
Authors: Bram Peeters; Philippe Meersseman; Sarah Vander Perre; Pieter J Wouters; Yves Debaveye; Lies Langouche; Greet Van den Berghe Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-10-29 Impact factor: 17.440