Literature DB >> 23837479

Rapid deaminator status is associated with poor clinical outcome in pancreatic cancer patients treated with a gemcitabine-based regimen.

Cindy Serdjebi1, Jean-François Seitz, Joseph Ciccolini, Muriel Duluc, Emmanuelle Norguet, Frédéric Fina, Bruno Lacarelle, L'houcine Ouafik, Laetitia Dahan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine is a mainstay in the treatment of biliary and pancreatic cancers, with limited efficacy in most settings. The gemcitabine elimination pattern is primarily driven by deamination in the liver by CDA. CDA is affected by genetic polymorphisms, leading to marked variations in activity and, subsequently, to erratic drug plasma exposures in patients administered with standard dosage. CDA deficiency has been a rising concern with gemcitabine since several studies have proven that poor metabolizer patients experience life-threatening toxicities upon drug intake. In theory, ultrarapid metabolizer (UM) patients should be conversely at risk of treatment failure, although thus far few studies have addressed this issue in digestive oncology. PATIENTS &
METHODS: A pilot study was conducted on 40 pancreatic cancer patients, all treated with gemcitabine-based therapy. CDA status was primarily established on a phenotypic basis determined by measurement of residual CDA enzymatic activity in serum. Additionally, a search for c208G>A and c79A>C polymorphisms was carried out.
RESULTS: No patients carrying c208G>A polymorphisms were found, and only heterozygous c79A>C patients were observed. Eight out of the 40 patients (i.e., 20%) were identified as UM, with CDA activities over 6 U/mg. CDA activity was significantly different between progressive disease patients and patients with controlled disease (8.4 vs 3 U/mg; p < 0.001). Conversely, fewer gemcitabine-related severe toxicities were observed in UM patients.
CONCLUSION: This pilot study strongly suggests that UM patients are nearly five-times more likely to have progressive disease than patients with normal or low CDA activities, and that beside molecular events at the tumor level, upstream deregulations affecting drug disposition should be taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23837479     DOI: 10.2217/pgs.13.93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenomics        ISSN: 1462-2416            Impact factor:   2.533


  13 in total

Review 1.  The Emerging Role of Cytidine Deaminase in Human Diseases: A New Opportunity for Therapy?

Authors:  Audrey Frances; Pierre Cordelier
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 11.454

2.  Novel Gemcitabine Conjugated Albumin Nanoparticles: a Potential Strategy to Enhance Drug Efficacy in Pancreatic Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Varun Kushwah; Ashish Kumar Agrawal; Chander Parkash Dora; David Mallinson; Dimitrios A Lamprou; Ramesh C Gupta; Sanyog Jain
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Determinants of the interindividual variability in serum cytidine deaminase activity of patients with solid tumours.

Authors:  R Cohen; L H Preta; V Joste; E Curis; O Huillard; A Jouinot; C Narjoz; A Thomas-Schoemann; A Bellesoeur; M Tiako Meyo; J Quilichini; D Desaulle; I Nicolis; A Cessot; M Vidal; F Goldwasser; J Alexandre; B Blanchet
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  A pilot clinical trial of the cytidine deaminase inhibitor tetrahydrouridine combined with decitabine to target DNMT1 in advanced, chemorefractory pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Davendra Sohal; Smitha Krishnamurthi; Rita Tohme; Xiaorong Gu; Daniel Lindner; Terry H Landowski; John Pink; Tomas Radivoyevitch; Sherry Fada; Zhenghong Lee; Dale Shepard; Alok Khorana; Yogen Saunthararajah
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Intracellular pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine, its deaminated metabolite 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine and their nucleotides.

Authors:  Ellen J B Derissen; Alwin D R Huitema; Hilde Rosing; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Potential Development of Tumor-Targeted Oral Anti-Cancer Prodrugs: Amino Acid and Dipeptide Monoester Prodrugs of Gemcitabine.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Tsume; Adam J Drelich; David E Smith; Gordon L Amidon
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  FFCD-1004 Clinical Trial: Impact of Cytidine Deaminase Activity on Clinical Outcome in Gemcitabine-Monotherapy Treated Patients.

Authors:  Cindy Serdjebi; Johan Gagnière; Jérôme Desramé; Francine Fein; Rosine Guimbaud; Eric François; Thierry André; Jean-François Seitz; Carole Montérymard; Dominique Arsene; Julien Volet; Abakar Abakar-Mahamat; Thierry Lecomte; Véronique Guerin-Meyer; Jean-Louis Legoux; Gaël Deplanque; Pierre Guillet; Joseph Ciccolini; Côme Lepage; Laetitia Dahan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of Gemcitabine as a mainstay in adult and pediatric oncology: an EORTC-PAMM perspective.

Authors:  Joseph Ciccolini; Cindy Serdjebi; Godefridus J Peters; Elisa Giovannetti
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 9.  Nucleobase and Nucleoside Analogues: Resistance and Re-Sensitisation at the Level of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Metabolism.

Authors:  Nikolaos Tsesmetzis; Cynthia B J Paulin; Sean G Rudd; Nikolas Herold
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  5-aza-2',2'-Difluoro Deoxycytidine (NUC013): A Novel Nucleoside DNA Methyl Transferase Inhibitor and Ribonucleotide Reductase Inhibitor for the Treatment of Cancer.

Authors:  Richard Daifuku; Zhenbo Hu; Yogen Saunthararajah
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.