Literature DB >> 23837378

Recent developments in livestock and wildlife brucellosis vaccination.

S C Olsen1.   

Abstract

Live attenuated brucellosis vaccines have been available for protecting domestic livestock against Brucella melitensis and B. abortus for more than 60 years. Current vaccines are effective in preventing abortion and transmission of brucellosis, but poor at preventing infection or seroconversion. In addition, they can induce abortions in pregnant animals and are infectious to humans. It can be argued that current vaccines were developed empirically in that the immunological mechanism(s) of action were not determined. Current knowledge suggests that both the innate and adaptive immune responses contribute to immunity against intracellular pathogens and that binding of pathogen structures onto pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) is crucial to the development of adaptive immunity. The phagosome appears to be vital for the presentation of antigens to T-cell subtypes that provide protective immunity to intracellular pathogens. The observation that killed bacteria or subunit vaccines do not appear to fully stimulate PRRs, or mimic Brucella trafficking through phagosomes, may explain their inability to induce immunity that equals the protection provided by live attenuated vaccines. Brucella appears to have multiple mechanisms that subvert innate and adaptive immunity and prevent or minimise immunological responses. New technologies, such as DNA vaccines and nanoparticles, may be capable of delivering Brucella antigens in a waythat induces protective immunity in domestic livestock or wildlife reservoirs of brucellosis. Because of the re-emergence of brucellosis worldwide, with an increasing incidence of human infection, there is a great need for improved brucellosis vaccines. The greatest need is for new or improved vaccines against B. melitensis and B. suis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23837378     DOI: 10.20506/rst.32.1.2201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Sci Tech        ISSN: 0253-1933            Impact factor:   1.181


  21 in total

1.  Recombinant Lactococcus Lactis Displaying Omp31 Antigen of Brucella melitensis Can Induce an Immunogenic Response in BALB/c Mice.

Authors:  Hoda Shirdast; Fatemeh Ebrahimzadeh; Amir Hossein Taromchi; Yousef Mortazavi; Abdolreza Esmaeilzadeh; Mohammad Hadi Sekhavati; Keivan Nedaei; Esmat Mirabzadeh
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Protective efficacy of a Brucella vaccine using a Salmonella-based delivery system expressing Brucella Omp3b, BCSP31, and SOD proteins against brucellosis in Korean black goats.

Authors:  Won-Kyong Kim; Ja-Young Moon; Jeong-Sang Cho; Jin Hur
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.310

3.  Encapsulated Brucella ovis Lacking a Putative ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter (ΔabcBA) Protects against Wild Type Brucella ovis in Rams.

Authors:  Ana Patrícia C Silva; Auricélio A Macêdo; Luciana F Costa; Cláudia E Rocha; Luize N N Garcia; Jade R D Farias; Priscilla P R Gomes; Gustavo C Teixeira; Kessler W J Fonseca; Andréa R F Maia; Gabriela G Neves; Everton L Romão; Teane M A Silva; Juliana P S Mol; Renata M Oliveira; Márcio S S Araújo; Ernane F Nascimento; Olindo A Martins-Filho; Humberto M Brandão; Tatiane A Paixão; Renato L Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Nasal vaccination stimulates CD8(+) T cells for potent protection against mucosal Brucella melitensis challenge.

Authors:  Beata Clapp; Xinghong Yang; Theresa Thornburg; Nancy Walters; David W Pascual
Journal:  Immunol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 5.126

5.  Molecular cloning, purification and immunogenicity of recombinant Brucella abortus 544 malate dehydrogenase protein.

Authors:  Alisha Wehdnesday Bernardo Reyes; Hannah Leah Tadeja Simborio; Huynh Tan Hop; Lauren Togonon Arayan; Suk Kim
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 1.672

6.  Seroprevalence of human brucellosis in and around Jammu, India, using different serological tests.

Authors:  H K Sharma; S K Kotwal; D K Singh; M A Malik; Arvind Kumar; M Singh
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2016-07-17

7.  Meta-Analysis and Advancement of Brucellosis Vaccinology.

Authors:  Tatiane F Carvalho; João Paulo A Haddad; Tatiane A Paixão; Renato L Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Immunoreactivity evaluation of a new recombinant chimeric protein against Brucella in the murine model.

Authors:  Abbas Abdollahi; Shahla Mansouri; Jafar Amani; Mahdi Fasihi-Ramandi; Mohammad Moradi
Journal:  Iran J Microbiol       Date:  2016-06

9.  Comparison between Immunization Routes of Live Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium Strains Expressing BCSP31, Omp3b, and SOD of Brucella abortus in Murine Model.

Authors:  Won K Kim; Ja Y Moon; Suk Kim; Jin Hur
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Protection efficacy of the Brucella abortus ghost vaccine candidate lysed by the N-terminal 24-amino acid fragment (GI24) of the 36-amino acid peptide PMAP-36 (porcine myeloid antimicrobial peptide 36) in murine models.

Authors:  Ae Jeong Kwon; Ja Young Moon; Won Kyong Kim; Suk Kim; Jin Hur
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 1.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.