| Literature DB >> 23837097 |
Jodok Matthias Grueneberger1, Tobias Fritz, Cheng Zhou, Sebastian Meyer, Iwona Karcz-Socha, Tomasz Sawczyn, Dominica Stygar, Matthias Goos, Ulrich Theodor Hopt, Simon Küsters.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Fast delivery of food to the terminal ileum is thought to be pathophysiologically responsible for type 2 diabetes remission after obesity surgery. Imitating this effect, ileal transposition (IT) is designed as initiating diabetes remission for non-obese patients. AIM: To date, it is not clear which length of the transposed segment achieves the best glucose lowering results. As previous rodent data mostly rely on a 10 cm IT, the current study evaluated a long segment IT (20 cm) in the diabetic obese Zucker rat.Entities:
Keywords: ileal transposition; metabolic surgery; obesity surgery; type 2 diabetes mellitus
Year: 2013 PMID: 23837097 PMCID: PMC3699773 DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2011.32925
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne ISSN: 1895-4588 Impact factor: 1.195
Figure 1Body weight ± SD and time schedule. From day 5, sham animals gained significantly more weight (p < 0.05)
Figure 2Ileal transposition: 50% of the ileum is transposed 5 cm behind the ligament of Treitz in an isoperistaltic fashion
AUC (mmol/l × min, 90 min) levels ± SD before and 2-3 weeks after IT/sham operation
| Variable | Baseline | IT | SHAM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGTT 1 | OGTT 2 | OGTT 3 | OGTT 4 | OGTT 3 | OGTT 4 | |
| AUC | 564.6 ±268.5 | 230.8 ±91.77 | 314.7 ±229.0 | 135.5 ±59.27 | 451.4 ±327.6 | 207.5 ±106.1 |
| Value of | < 0.0001 | < 0.05 | < 0.01 | 0.154 | 0.460 | |
vs. baseline
OGTT 1 vs. 2
Figure 3Serial OGTTs performed at day –7, 0, 14, 20 (1.5 g/kg glucose orally). OGTT 2 and 4 were performed as single procedures (A), OGTT 1 and 3 with simultaneous blood collection (B). Ileal transposition led to a significant reduction in AUC compared to baseline levels at 2 weeks (p < 0.05, n = 9, Figure B) and 3 weeks (p < 0.01, n = 7, Figure A)
Serum levels ± SD of incretins before and 2 weeks after IT/sham operation
| Variable | Baseline | IT | SHAM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre glucose | Post glucose | Pre glucose | Post glucose | Pre glucose | Post glucose | |
| GLP-1 | 7.20 ±4.55 | 5.07 ±2.44 | 7.50 ±4.37 | 18.52 ±14.22 | 4.92 ±2.82 | 5.75 ±3.73 |
| PYY | 134.6 ±36.83 | 115.9 ±41.64 | 145.0 ±46.76 | 164.0 ±62.26 | 110.0 ±19.38 | 129.7 ±64.62 |
| Insulin | 12.07 ±7.19 | 18.22 ±12.99 | 9.95 ±9.73 | 12.66 ±6.70 | 10.27 ±7.95 | 15.65 ±13.37 |
p < 0.05 vs. baseline
p < 0.01 vs. baseline
p < 0.5 vs. SHAM
Figure 4GLP-1, PYY and insulin levels, determined by multiplex ELISA 2 weeks postoperative. A – Glucosestimulated GLP-1 levels in the IT group (n = 9) were significantly raised, compared to preop. levels (**p < 0.01), SHAM (# p < 0.05) and fasted (unstimulated) IT animals (‡ p < 0.05). B – IT animals displayed raised PYY levels compared to SHAM animals (#Unstim./stim. p < 0.05 for both) and compared to preoperative levels (*stimulated p < 0.05). C – Insulin levels remained unchanged when compared to preoperative levels and sham animals. D – Simultaneously determined, portal GLP-1 levels were higher compared to aortic levels in IT animals (‡ p < 0.05)
Serum levels ± SD of incretins in portal vein and aorta at postoperative day 21
| Variable | IT | Sham | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aorta | Portal vein | Aorta | Portal vein | |
| GLP-1 | 7.78 ±2.30 | 12.41 ±5.3 | 6.07 ±3.25 | 8.74 ±4.45 |
| PYY | 172.2 ±66.19 | 168.6 ±72.68 | 182.5 ±58.16 | 155.4 ±77.01 |
| Insulin | 12.6 ±20.2 | 13.65 ±18.09 | 8.53 ±3.77 | 7.11 ± 3.90 |
p < 0.05