BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is considered the most common liver disease affecting 15-25% of the general population. AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of NAFLD and the relationship between insulin sensitivity and NAFLD in grade III high and very high cardiovascular additional risk essential hypertensive patients according to the circadian blood pressure (BP) rhythm. METHOD: This four-year prospective study was conducted at the Department of Internal Medicine at Cluj-Napoca's Diagnosis and Treatment Centre in Romania. The study included grade III essential hypertensive patients. Hypertensive patients were divided into four groups according to the diurnal index (DI) from ABPM monitoring: dipper (D), non-dipper (ND), reverse-dipper (RD), and extreme-dipper (ED). All hypertensive patients underwent 24 ABPM, blood tests and abdominal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of fatty liver disease. RESULTS: Thirty-five hypertensive patients were included in the study, with 31.42% ND, 11.43% RD, 8.57% ED and 48.57% D. The prevalence of NAFLD was significantly higher in ND, RD and ED when compared to D. When compared to the dipper group of hypertensive patients a statistically significantly higher level of plasma insulin was observed: in non-dipper [86.3±17.9pmol/l vs. 62.2±203pmol/l, p<0.05], in reverse dipper [88.3±18.6pmol/l vs. 62.2±20.3pmol/l] and in extreme-dippers [86.7±16.88pmol/l vs. 62.2±20.3 pmol/l, p<0.05]. CONCLUSION: The altered dipping status (ND, RD, ED) of hypertension associated with a higher insulin resistance could be the pathogenetic link between the NAFLD and altered blood pressure status. Altered BP status could be a marker of NAFLD in hypertensive patients.
BACKGROUND:Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is considered the most common liver disease affecting 15-25% of the general population. AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of NAFLD and the relationship between insulin sensitivity and NAFLD in grade III high and very high cardiovascular additional risk essential hypertensivepatients according to the circadian blood pressure (BP) rhythm. METHOD: This four-year prospective study was conducted at the Department of Internal Medicine at Cluj-Napoca's Diagnosis and Treatment Centre in Romania. The study included grade III essential hypertensivepatients. Hypertensivepatients were divided into four groups according to the diurnal index (DI) from ABPM monitoring: dipper (D), non-dipper (ND), reverse-dipper (RD), and extreme-dipper (ED). All hypertensivepatients underwent 24 ABPM, blood tests and abdominal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of fatty liver disease. RESULTS: Thirty-five hypertensivepatients were included in the study, with 31.42% ND, 11.43% RD, 8.57% ED and 48.57% D. The prevalence of NAFLD was significantly higher in ND, RD and ED when compared to D. When compared to the dipper group of hypertensivepatients a statistically significantly higher level of plasma insulin was observed: in non-dipper [86.3±17.9pmol/l vs. 62.2±203pmol/l, p<0.05], in reverse dipper [88.3±18.6pmol/l vs. 62.2±20.3pmol/l] and in extreme-dippers [86.7±16.88pmol/l vs. 62.2±20.3 pmol/l, p<0.05]. CONCLUSION: The altered dipping status (ND, RD, ED) of hypertension associated with a higher insulin resistance could be the pathogenetic link between the NAFLD and altered blood pressure status. Altered BP status could be a marker of NAFLD in hypertensivepatients.
Authors: Saverio Stranges; Maurizio Trevisan; Joan M Dorn; Jacek Dmochowski; Richard P Donahue Journal: Hypertension Date: 2005-10-03 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Valéria Lamounier-Zepter; Monika Ehrhart-Bornstein; Stefan R Bornstein Journal: Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 4.690
Authors: Seung Mi Lee; Joong Shin Park; You Jung Han; Won Kim; Seung Hyun Bang; Byoung Jae Kim; Chan Wook Park; Moon Young Kim Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2020-07-06 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Claudio Tana; Stefano Ballestri; Fabrizio Ricci; Angelo Di Vincenzo; Andrea Ticinesi; Sabina Gallina; Maria Adele Giamberardino; Francesco Cipollone; Richard Sutton; Roberto Vettor; Artur Fedorowski; Tiziana Meschi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-08-26 Impact factor: 3.390