| Literature DB >> 23837064 |
Yajun Zhang1, Fengzhe Chen, Enhua Sun, Ruiping Ma, Chunmei Qu, Lixian Ma.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the effects of combinations of fosfomycin, minocycline and polymyxin B in the treatment of pan-drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (PDR-Ab). The in vitro antibacterial activities of the drugs were evaluated by determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI). A total of 25 strains of PDR-Ab were selected using the VITEK32 microbial analysis instrument and the Kirby-Bauer (K-B) method. A broth microdilution method was used to determine the MIC for each of the three drugs, and the checkerboard method was simultaneously used to determine the MICs for combinations of the drugs. FICI values were also calculated. While fosfomycin alone was ineffective for the treatment of PDR-Ab, its MIC value was significantly reduced when used in combination with minocycline or polymyxin B. The combined use of minocycline and polymyxin B also significantly reduced the MIC value of each drug. The FICI values revealed that the drugs had synergistic or additive effects when used in combination. The determination of the MIC and FICI values for the combinations of drugs demonstrated that there is synergistic or additive effect upon the combined use of fosfomycin with minocycline or polymyxin B. The combined use of minocycline and polymyxin B also results in a significant reduction in the MIC values of the two drugs. These experimental results may provide a basis for the future clinical treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii.Entities:
Keywords: fosfomycin; fractional inhibitory concentration index; minimum inhibitory concentration; minocycline; pan-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; polymyxin B
Year: 2013 PMID: 23837064 PMCID: PMC3702694 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2013.1039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Antimicrobial MICG, MIC50, and MIC90 values of fosfomycin, minocycline and polymyxin B (μg/ml).
| Antimicrobial drugs | MICrange | MICG | MIC50 | MIC90 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polymyxin B | 1–8 | 3.8906 | 4 | 8 |
| Minocycline | 4–16 | 11.4716 | 16 | 16 |
| Fosfomycin | >512 | >512 | - | - |
MICrange, the range of the MIC values; MICG, the mean MIC value; MIC50, the MIC value at which 50% of bacteria were inhibited; MIC90, the MIC value at which 90% of bacteria were inhibited.
MIC values of fosfomycin, minocycline and polymyxin B in combined use (μg/ml).
| Combined medication | MICrange | MICG | MIC50 | MIC90 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polymyxin B and minocycline | 0.25–4 | 1.0281 | 1 | 2 |
| 0.25–8 | 2.2974 | 2 | 8 | |
| Polymyxin B and fosfomycin | 0.25–4 | 1.3195 | 2 | 4 |
| 64–1024 | 484.381 | 512 | 1024 | |
| Minocycline and fosfomycin | 0.5–4 | 2.1140 | 2 | 4 |
| 64–1024 | 526.39 | 512 | 1024 |
MICrange, the range of the MIC values; MICG, the mean MIC value; MIC50, the MIC value at which 50% of bacteria were inhibited; MIC90, the MIC value at which 90% of bacteria were inhibited. The MIC values of the three drugs when used alone were significantly different from those when used in combination (P<0.05).
Figure 1Antibacterial effects of minocycline, polymyxin B and their combinations. Curve A, concentrations of minocycline when used alone; curve B, concentrations of polymyxin B when used alone; curve C, concentrations of minocycline when used in combination with polymyxin B; curve D, concentrations of polymyxin B when used in combination with minocycline. PDR-ABA, pan-drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration.
Fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) values of fosfomycin, minocycline and polymyxin B upon combined use.
| Combined medication | FICI (≤0.5) | FICI (0.5–1) | FICI (1–4) | FICI (>4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polymyxin B and minocycline | 44% | 48% | 8% | 0 |
| Polymyxin B and fosfomycin | 16% | 44% | 40% | 0 |
| Minocycline and fosfomycin | 12% | 56% | 32% | 0 |