Literature DB >> 23836154

Challenges and opportunities of lifelog technologies: a literature review and critical analysis.

Tim Jacquemard1, Peter Novitzky, Fiachra O'Brolcháin, Alan F Smeaton, Bert Gordijn.   

Abstract

In a lifelog, data from various sources are combined to form a record from which one can retrieve information about oneself and the environment in which one is situated. It could be considered similar to an automated biography. Lifelog technology is still at an early stage of development. However, the history of lifelogs so far shows a clear academic, corporate and governmental interest. Therefore, a thorough inquiry into the ethical aspects of lifelogs could prove beneficial to the responsible development of this field. This article maps the main ethically relevant challenges and opportunities associated with the further development of lifelog technologies as discussed in the scholarly literature. By identifying challenges and opportunities in the current debate, we were able to identify other challenges and opportunities left unmentioned. Some of these challenges are partly explained by a blind spot in the current debate. Whilst the current debate focuses mainly on lifelogs held by individuals, lifelogs held by governmental institutions and corporations pose idiosyncratic ethical concerns as well. We have provided a brief taxonomy of lifelog technology to show the variety in uses for lifelogs. In addition, we provided a general approach to alleviate the ethical challenges identified in the critical analysis.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23836154     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-013-9456-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  3 in total

1.  Self-presentation 2.0: narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook.

Authors:  Soraya Mehdizadeh
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw       Date:  2010-08

Review 2.  Memories for life: a review of the science and technology.

Authors:  Kieron O'Hara; Richard Morris; Nigel Shadbolt; Graham J Hitch; Wendy Hall; Neil Beagrie
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  An ethical framework for automated, wearable cameras in health behavior research.

Authors:  Paul Kelly; Simon J Marshall; Hannah Badland; Jacqueline Kerr; Melody Oliver; Aiden R Doherty; Charlie Foster
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.043

  3 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Ethical Implications of User Perceptions of Wearable Devices.

Authors:  L H Segura Anaya; Abeer Alsadoon; N Costadopoulos; P W C Prasad
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Inclusion of Assistive Technologies in a Basic Package of Essential Healthcare Service.

Authors:  Fiachra O'Brolcháin; Bert Gordijn
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2018-06

Review 3.  Too much information: visual research ethics in the age of wearable cameras.

Authors:  Tze Ming Mok; Flora Cornish; Jen Tarr
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2015-06

Review 4.  Lifelog Retrieval From Daily Digital Data: Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ricardo Ribeiro; Alina Trifan; António J R Neves
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 4.947

5.  Screenomics: A Framework to Capture and Analyze Personal Life Experiences and the Ways that Technology Shapes Them.

Authors:  Byron Reeves; Nilam Ram; Thomas N Robinson; James J Cummings; C Lee Giles; Jennifer Pan; Agnese Chiatti; M J Cho; Katie Roehrick; Xiao Yang; Anupriya Gagneja; Miriam Brinberg; Daniel Muise; Yingdan Lu; Mufan Luo; Andrew Fitzgerald; Leo Yeykelis
Journal:  Hum Comput Interact       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.750

6.  Talk, Text, Tag? Understanding Self-Annotation of Smart Home Data from a User's Perspective.

Authors:  Emma L Tonkin; Alison Burrows; Przemysław R Woznowski; Pawel Laskowski; Kristina Y Yordanova; Niall Twomey; Ian J Craddock
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.