Literature DB >> 23835943

Regulatory modeling and simulation moves into the next gear in europe.

P H van der Graaf1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23835943      PMCID: PMC3600761          DOI: 10.1038/psp.2013.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol        ISSN: 2163-8306


× No keyword cloud information.
The increasing pace of investments across academia and industry in the areas of pharmacometrics and systems pharmacology has the potential to profoundly impact drug discovery and development efficiency. In addition, it is being recognized that model-based approaches have also increasingly become important in regulatory decision making.[1,2,3] For example, an analysis of 198 new drug application and biological license application submissions, reviewed by the US Food and Drug Administration's Division of Pharmacometrics during the period 2000–2008, suggested an impact of the pharmacometrics analysis on drug approval and labeling decisions in ~65% of the cases. Although the potential for regulatory impact of modeling and simulation (M&S) appears to be shared by regulators across most international agencies, there are marked differences in the implementation of pharmacometric assessments during drug registration.[1] For example, to date, the US Food and Drug Administration is the only regulatory agency that has a dedicated Pharmacometrics group, formed within the Office of Clinical Pharmacology in 2009,[2] which not only reviews submissions but also conducts its own analyses. It now appears that regulatory M&S moves into the next gear in Europe as well, because in a recent press release, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) announced the creation of a new regulatory M&S working group being effective from the end of January 2013 (http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/). This announcement builds on the output from a joint EMA and European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) workshop on M&S,[4] held at the end of 2011, at which representatives from industry, academia, and regulatory agencies discussed the current and future role of M&S in the development and registration of medicinal products. Specifically, one of the actions from the workshop was that the “EMA will aim to increase the regulatory M&S competence in Europe by coordinating the expertise across Member States to provide a consistent approach in product-related and methodology-related discussions,”[4] and the recent announcement demonstrates that the European regulators have started to deliver on this commitment. Consistent with the journal's mission to be a “publication platform for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology that will contribute to further growth of the disciplines and a broader application and better integration of the model-based approaches across the research and development spectrum,”[5] the current issue of CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology contains a full report of the plenary session[4] and four breakout sessions[6,7,8,9] of the EMA/EFPIA Workshop on M&S, coauthored by a range of discipline leaders from EMA, EFPIA, and European academic centers.

Conflict of Interest

P.H. van der G. is an employee of Pfizer.
  9 in total

1.  Impact of pharmacometric analyses on new drug approval and labelling decisions: a review of 198 submissions between 2000 and 2008.

Authors:  Joo Yeon Lee; Christine E Garnett; Jogarao V S Gobburu; Venkatesh A Bhattaram; Satjit Brar; Justin C Earp; Pravin R Jadhav; Kevin Krudys; Lawrence J Lesko; Fang Li; Jiang Liu; Rajnikanth Madabushi; Anshu Marathe; Nitin Mehrotra; Christoffer Tornoe; Yaning Wang; Hao Zhu
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Pharmacometrics for regulatory decision making: status and perspective.

Authors:  Efthymios Manolis; Ralf Herold
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Model-based drug approval - the rubber hits the road.

Authors:  Hartmut Derendorf
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.366

4.  Modeling and simulation to optimize the design and analysis of confirmatory trials, characterize risk-benefit, and support label claims.

Authors:  S F Marshall; R Hemmings; F Josephson; M O Karlsson; M Posch; J-L Steimer
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2013-02-27

5.  Modeling and simulation at the interface of nonclinical and early clinical drug development.

Authors:  S A G Visser; E Manolis; M Danhof; T Kerbusch
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2013-02-27

6.  The Role of Modeling and Simulation in Development and Registration of Medicinal Products: Output From the EFPIA/EMA Modeling and Simulation Workshop.

Authors:  E Manolis; S Rohou; R Hemmings; T Salmonson; M Karlsson; P A Milligan
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2013-02-27

7.  Modeling and simulation in clinical pharmacology and dose finding.

Authors:  A Staab; E Rook; M Maliepaard; L Aarons; C Benson
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2013-02-27

8.  Modeling and simulation as a tool to bridge efficacy and safety data in special populations.

Authors:  L Harnisch; T Shepard; G Pons; O Della Pasqua
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2013-02-27

9.  CPT: Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology.

Authors:  Piet H van der Graaf
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2012-09-26
  9 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling in Pediatric Drug Development, and the Importance of Standardized Scaling of Clearance.

Authors:  Eva Germovsek; Charlotte I S Barker; Mike Sharland; Joseph F Standing
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.577

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.