Literature DB >> 23835230

EU marketing authorization review of orphan and non-orphan drugs does not differ.

M Putzeist1, A K Mantel-Teeuwisse, J Llinares, C C Gispen-De Wied, A W Hoes, H G M Leufkens.   

Abstract

Marketing authorization application dossiers of 17 orphan drugs (ODs) and 51 non-ODs evaluated by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in the period 2009-2010 were compared. We aimed to identify whether any differences existed between ODs and non-ODs in number and type of deficits brought forward during the EMA review, regarding the clinical development plan, clinical outcome and medical need and studied whether these deficits were similarly associated with marketing approval in the EU. In 71% of the ODs dossiers and 65% of the non-ODs dossiers marketing approval was granted. Differences in deficits were found, but similarities in the way ODs and non-ODs were reviewed and marketing approval decisions were taken, underline that regulatory standards are equally high.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23835230     DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2013.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Discov Today        ISSN: 1359-6446            Impact factor:   7.851


  3 in total

Review 1.  Review and comparison of clinical evidence submitted to support European Medicines Agency market authorization of orphan-designated oncological treatments.

Authors:  Julie Winstone; Shkun Chadda; Stephen Ralston; Peter Sajosi
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.123

2.  Reconciling uncertainty of costs and outcomes with the need for access to orphan medicinal products: a comparative study of managed entry agreements across seven European countries.

Authors:  Thomas Morel; Francis Arickx; Gustaf Befrits; Paolo Siviero; Caroline van der Meijden; Entela Xoxi; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 4.123

3.  Oncologic orphan drugs approved in the EU - do clinical trial data correspond with real-world effectiveness?

Authors:  Yvonne Schuller; Marieke Biegstraaten; Carla E M Hollak; Heinz-Josef Klümpen; Christine C Gispen-de Wied; Violeta Stoyanova-Beninska
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 4.123

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.