A Figl-Hertlein1, B Horsak2, E Dean3, W Schöny4, T Stamm5. 1. Institute for Sciences and Services in Health, St. Poelten University of Applied Sciences, St. Poelten, Austria; Department of Physiotherapy, St. Poelten University of Applied Sciences, St. Poelten, Austria. Electronic address: astrid.figl@fhstp.ac.at. 2. Institute for Sciences and Services in Health, St. Poelten University of Applied Sciences, St. Poelten, Austria; Department of Physiotherapy, St. Poelten University of Applied Sciences, St. Poelten, Austria. 3. Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. 4. Clinic for Rehabilitation of Neurology and Psychiatry, Linz, Austria. 5. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although physiotherapists have long advocated workplace health, school teachers have not traditionally been a focus of study by these professionals. However, classroom teaching contributes to a range of occupational health issues related to general health as well as ergonomics that can be prevented or addressed by physiotherapists. OBJECTIVES: To undertake a pilot study to explore the potential effects of a physiotherapy-directed occupational health programme individualised for school teachers, develop study methodology and gather preliminary data to establish a 'proof of concept' to inform future studies. DESIGN: Cluster randomised pilot study using a convenience sample. SETTING:Eight Austrian regional secondary schools. PARTICIPANTS: Schools and their teachers were recruited and allocated to an intervention group (IG, n=26 teachers) or a control group (CG, n=43 teachers). Teachers were eligible to participate if they reported no health issues that compromised their classroom responsibilities. INTERVENTIONS: The IG participated in an individualised physiotherapy-directed occupational health programme (six 30-minute sessions) related to ergonomics and stress management conducted over a 5-month semester. The CG had a pseudo-intervention of one oral education session. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included scores from the physical and mental components and health transition item of the Short-Form-36 Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36), and emotional well-being and resistance to stress items from the work-related behaviour and experience patterns questionnaire. Data were collected before and after one semester. RESULTS: The primary outcome measure, the SF-36 physical component score, showed a reduction in the CG and no change in the IG, meaning that the CG deteriorated over the study semester while the IG did not show any change. CONCLUSIONS: A physiotherapy-directed occupational health programme may prevent deterioration of physical health of school teachers in one semester (proof of concept). This pilot study provided valuable information to inform the design of replication and extension studies related to this work.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Although physiotherapists have long advocated workplace health, school teachers have not traditionally been a focus of study by these professionals. However, classroom teaching contributes to a range of occupational health issues related to general health as well as ergonomics that can be prevented or addressed by physiotherapists. OBJECTIVES: To undertake a pilot study to explore the potential effects of a physiotherapy-directed occupational health programme individualised for school teachers, develop study methodology and gather preliminary data to establish a 'proof of concept' to inform future studies. DESIGN: Cluster randomised pilot study using a convenience sample. SETTING: Eight Austrian regional secondary schools. PARTICIPANTS: Schools and their teachers were recruited and allocated to an intervention group (IG, n=26 teachers) or a control group (CG, n=43 teachers). Teachers were eligible to participate if they reported no health issues that compromised their classroom responsibilities. INTERVENTIONS: The IG participated in an individualised physiotherapy-directed occupational health programme (six 30-minute sessions) related to ergonomics and stress management conducted over a 5-month semester. The CG had a pseudo-intervention of one oral education session. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included scores from the physical and mental components and health transition item of the Short-Form-36 Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36), and emotional well-being and resistance to stress items from the work-related behaviour and experience patterns questionnaire. Data were collected before and after one semester. RESULTS: The primary outcome measure, the SF-36 physical component score, showed a reduction in the CG and no change in the IG, meaning that the CG deteriorated over the study semester while the IG did not show any change. CONCLUSIONS: A physiotherapy-directed occupational health programme may prevent deterioration of physical health of school teachers in one semester (proof of concept). This pilot study provided valuable information to inform the design of replication and extension studies related to this work.