BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a very debilitating disease refractory to current treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in up to 30 percent of patients, illustrating the need for new treatments of PTSD. Neuroimaging studies have shown increased activity of the amygdala of patients with PTSD. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate amygdala deep brain stimulation (DBS) as a possible novel treatment for PTSD and compare it to current treatment with a commonly used SSRI, paroxetine, in a rat PTSD model. METHODS: A PTSD model was created by subjecting rats to inescapable foot shocks in the presence of a conspicuous ball. Response to treatment was measured as a decreased burying behavior when presented with the same ball 1 and 2 weeks after the shocks. Rats were treated with either daily intraperitoneal paroxetine injections or amygdala DBS via an electrode implanted 1 week prior to shocks. Generalized anxiety was assessed using an elevated plus maze. RESULTS: Animals treated with amygdala DBS showed less ball burying at 2 weeks relative to the animals treated with paroxetine. The animals treated with paroxetine, however, had a lower general anxiety level compared to the DBS-treated group. CONCLUSIONS: In this PTSD model, paroxetine was found to decrease the measured general anxiety level of rats that underwent the PTSD protocol, but did not counteract shock-induced hyper-vigilance toward the trauma-associated object (ball). Amygdala DBS, however, did decrease shock-induced hyper-vigilance as measured by a lower burying time, but had no effect on general anxiety assessed in the elevated plus maze. By attenuating amygdala function, DBS may act to treat the cause of PTSD, hyperactive amygdala function, and may be a promising novel alternative in cases of PTSD refractory to current pharmacological treatments. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND:Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a very debilitating disease refractory to current treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in up to 30 percent of patients, illustrating the need for new treatments of PTSD. Neuroimaging studies have shown increased activity of the amygdala of patients with PTSD. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate amygdala deep brain stimulation (DBS) as a possible novel treatment for PTSD and compare it to current treatment with a commonly used SSRI, paroxetine, in a ratPTSD model. METHODS: A PTSD model was created by subjecting rats to inescapable foot shocks in the presence of a conspicuous ball. Response to treatment was measured as a decreased burying behavior when presented with the same ball 1 and 2 weeks after the shocks. Rats were treated with either daily intraperitoneal paroxetine injections or amygdala DBS via an electrode implanted 1 week prior to shocks. Generalized anxiety was assessed using an elevated plus maze. RESULTS: Animals treated with amygdala DBS showed less ball burying at 2 weeks relative to the animals treated with paroxetine. The animals treated with paroxetine, however, had a lower general anxiety level compared to the DBS-treated group. CONCLUSIONS: In this PTSD model, paroxetine was found to decrease the measured general anxiety level of rats that underwent the PTSD protocol, but did not counteract shock-induced hyper-vigilance toward the trauma-associated object (ball). Amygdala DBS, however, did decrease shock-induced hyper-vigilance as measured by a lower burying time, but had no effect on general anxiety assessed in the elevated plus maze. By attenuating amygdala function, DBS may act to treat the cause of PTSD, hyperactive amygdala function, and may be a promising novel alternative in cases of PTSD refractory to current pharmacological treatments. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
Amygdala; Deep brain stimulation; Paroxetine; Posttraumatic stress disorder; Psychosurgery
Authors: David P Cenkner; Helen J Burgess; Brooke Huizenga; Elizabeth R Duval; Hyungjin Myra Kim; K Luan Phan; Israel Liberzon; Heide Klumpp; James Abelson; Adam Horwitz; Ann Mooney; Greta B Raglan; Alyson K Zalta Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-06-08 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Ralph J Koek; Jean-Philippe Langevin; Scott E Krahl; Hovsep J Kosoyan; Holly N Schwartz; James W Y Chen; Rebecca Melrose; Mark J Mandelkern; David Sultzer Journal: Trials Date: 2014-09-10 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: P Justin Rossi; Aysegul Gunduz; Jack Judy; Linda Wilson; Andre Machado; James J Giordano; W Jeff Elias; Marvin A Rossi; Christopher L Butson; Michael D Fox; Cameron C McIntyre; Nader Pouratian; Nicole C Swann; Coralie de Hemptinne; Robert E Gross; Howard J Chizeck; Michele Tagliati; Andres M Lozano; Wayne Goodman; Jean-Philippe Langevin; Ron L Alterman; Umer Akbar; Greg A Gerhardt; Warren M Grill; Mark Hallett; Todd Herrington; Jeffrey Herron; Craig van Horne; Brian H Kopell; Anthony E Lang; Codrin Lungu; Daniel Martinez-Ramirez; Alon Y Mogilner; Rene Molina; Enrico Opri; Kevin J Otto; Karim G Oweiss; Yagna Pathak; Aparna Shukla; Jonathan Shute; Sameer A Sheth; Ludy C Shih; G Karl Steinke; Alexander I Tröster; Nora Vanegas; Kareem A Zaghloul; Leopoldo Cendejas-Zaragoza; Leonard Verhagen; Kelly D Foote; Michael S Okun Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Jean-Philippe Langevin; James W Y Chen; Ralph J Koek; David L Sultzer; Mark A Mandelkern; Holly N Schwartz; Scott E Krahl Journal: Brain Sci Date: 2016-08-10