Literature DB >> 23834757

Behavioural and neurophysiological markers reveal differential sensitivity to homeostatic interactions between centrally and peripherally applied passive stimulation.

M A Gatica Tossi1, P Stude, P Schwenkreis, M Tegenthoff, H R Dinse.   

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective tool for inducing functional plastic changes in the brain. rTMS can also potentiate the effects of other interventions such as tactile coactivation, a form of repetitive stimulation, when both are applied simultaneously. In this study, we investigated the interaction of these techniques in affecting tactile acuity and cortical excitability, measured with somatosensory evoked potentials after paired median nerve stimulation. We first applied a session of 5-Hz rTMS, followed by a session of tactile repetitive stimulation, consisting of intermittent high-frequency tactile stimulation (iHFS) to a group of 15 healthy volunteers ("rTMS + iHFS" group). In a second group ("rTMS w/o iHFS"), rTMS was applied without iHFS, with a third assessment performed after a similar wait period. In the rTMS w/o iHFS group, the 5-Hz rTMS induced an increase in cortical excitability that continued to build for at least 25 min after stimulation, with the effect on excitability after the wait period being inversely correlated to the baseline state. In the rTMS + iHFS group, the second intervention prevented the continued increase in excitability after rTMS. In contrast to the effect on cortical excitability, rTMS produced an improvement in tactile acuity that remained stable until the last assessment, independent of the presence or absence of iHFS. Our results show that these methods can interact homeostatically when used consecutively, and suggest that different measures of cortical plasticity are differentially susceptible to homeostatic interactions.
© 2013 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  cortical excitability; homeostatic plasticity; human; repetitive sensory stimulation; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; somatosensory evoked potentials

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23834757     DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  4 in total

1.  Metaplasticity in human primary somatosensory cortex: effects on physiology and tactile perception.

Authors:  Christina B Jones; Tea Lulic; Aaron Z Bailey; Tanner N Mackenzie; Yi Qun Mi; Mark Tommerdahl; Aimee J Nelson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability Depends on the Pattern of Mechanical Tactile Stimulation.

Authors:  Sho Kojima; Hideaki Onishi; Shota Miyaguchi; Shinichi Kotan; Ryoki Sasaki; Masaki Nakagawa; Hikari Kirimoto; Hiroyuki Tamaki
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.599

3.  The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns.

Authors:  Sho Kojima; Shota Miyaguchi; Ryoki Sasaki; Shota Tsuiki; Kei Saito; Yasuto Inukai; Naofumi Otsuru; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The Repetitive Mechanical Tactile Stimulus Intervention Effects Depend on Input Methods.

Authors:  Hiraku Watanabe; Sho Kojima; Naofumi Otsuru; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.