Literature DB >> 23834369

Analyses of muscle spindles in the soleus of six inbred mouse strains.

Arimantas Lionikas1, Colin J Smith, Tracey L Smith, Lutz Bünger, Robert W Banks, Guy S Bewick.   

Abstract

Adult muscle size and fibre-type composition are heritable traits that vary substantially between individuals. We used inbred mouse strains in which soleus muscle mass varied by an order of magnitude to explore whether properties of muscle spindles can also be influenced by genetic factors. Skip-serial cross-sections of soleus muscles dissected from 15 male mice of BEH, BEL, C57BL/6J, DUH, LG/J and SM/J strains were analysed for number of muscle spindles and characteristics of intrafusal and extrafusal fibres following ATPase staining. The BEL and DUH strains determined the range of: soleus mean size, a 10-fold difference from 2.1 to 22.3 mg, respectively; the mean number of extrafusal fibres, a 2.5-fold difference from 497 to 1249; and mean fibre-cross-sectional area, three-fold difference, e.g. for type 1 fibres, from 678 to 1948 μm². The range of mean proportion of type 1 fibres was determined by C57BL/6J (31%) and DUH (64%) strains. The mean number of spindles per muscle ranged between nine (LG/J) and 13 (BEL) (strain effect P < 0.02). Genetic correlations between spindle count and muscle weight or properties of extrafusal fibres were weak and not statistically significant. However, there was a strong correlation between the proportion of spindles with more than one bag2 fibre and the proportion of extrafusal fibres that were of type 1, and strain-dependent variation in the numbers of such spindles was statistically significant. The numbers of intrafusal fibres per spindle ranged from 2 to 8, with the most common complement of four found in 75.6% of spindles. There were no significant differences between the strains in the mean numbers of intrafusal fibres; however, the variance of the number was significantly less for the C57BL/6J strain than for any of the others. We conclude that abundance of muscle spindles and their intrafusal-fibre composition are substantially determined by genetic factors, which are different from those affecting muscle size and properties of the extrafusal fibres.
© 2013 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genetics; intrafusal fibers; proprioceptors

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23834369      PMCID: PMC3972049          DOI: 10.1111/joa.12076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  23 in total

1.  Cinematographic analysis of contractile events produced in intrafusal muscle fibres by stimulation of static and dynamic fusimotor axons.

Authors:  P Bessou; B Pagés
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  A study of mammalian intrafusal muscle fibres using a combined histochemical and ultrastructural technique.

Authors:  R W Banks; D W Harker; M J Stacey
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  On the Anatomical Constitution of Nerves of Skeletal Muscles; with Remarks on Recurrent Fibres in the Ventral Spinal Nerve-root.

Authors:  C S Sherrington
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1894-10-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The distribution of static gamma-axons in the tenuissimus muscle of the cat.

Authors:  R W Banks
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Axon and muscle spindle hyperplasia in the myostatin null mouse.

Authors:  Mohamed I Elashry; Anthony Otto; Antonios Matsakas; Salah E El-Morsy; Lisa Jones; Bethan Anderson; Ketan Patel
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Three "myosin adenosine triphosphatase" systems: the nature of their pH lability and sulfhydryl dependence.

Authors:  M H Brooke; K K Kaiser
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 2.479

7.  Genetic correlation between open-field activity and defecation: analysis with the CXB recombinant-inbred strains.

Authors:  D A Blizard; D W Bailey
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  ErbB2 is required for muscle spindle and myoblast cell survival.

Authors:  Eran R Andrechek; William R Hardy; Adele A Girgis-Gabardo; Robert L S Perry; Richard Butler; Frank L Graham; Ronald C Kahn; Michael A Rudnicki; William J Muller
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Lack of neurotrophin-3 leads to deficiencies in the peripheral nervous system and loss of limb proprioceptive afferents.

Authors:  P Ernfors; K F Lee; J Kucera; R Jaenisch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-05-20       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  QTL Analysis of Type I and Type IIA Fibers in Soleus Muscle in a Cross between LG/J and SM/J Mouse Strains.

Authors:  Andrew M Carroll; Abraham A Palmer; Arimantas Lionikas
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 4.599

View more
  7 in total

1.  Discovery and refinement of muscle weight QTLs in B6 × D2 advanced intercross mice.

Authors:  P Carbonetto; R Cheng; J P Gyekis; C C Parker; D A Blizard; A A Palmer; A Lionikas
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.107

2.  Phase contrast synchrotron radiation computed tomography of muscle spindles in the mouse soleus muscle.

Authors:  B Zeller-Plumhoff; T Roose; O L Katsamenis; M N Mavrogordato; C Torrens; P Schneider; G F Clough
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Baseline Muscle Mass Is a Poor Predictor of Functional Overload-Induced Gain in the Mouse Model.

Authors:  Audrius Kilikevicius; Lutz Bunger; Arimantas Lionikas
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Analysis of Proprioceptive Sensory Innervation of the Mouse Soleus: A Whole-Mount Muscle Approach.

Authors:  Martha J Sonner; Marie C Walters; David R Ladle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Myostatin dysfunction does not protect from fasting-induced loss of muscle mass in mice.

Authors:  Andrej Fokin; Petras Minderis; Tomas Venckunas; Arimantas Lionikas; Mindaugas Kvedaras; Aivaras Ratkevicius
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 2.041

Review 6.  Muscle spindle function in healthy and diseased muscle.

Authors:  Stephan Kröger; Bridgette Watkins
Journal:  Skelet Muscle       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.912

Review 7.  The innervation of the muscle spindle: a personal history.

Authors:  Robert W Banks
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 2.610

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.