Anna Louropoulou1, Dagmar E Slot, Fridus Van der Weijden. 1. Department of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the ability of mechanical instruments to clean contaminated implant titanium surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane-CENTRAL and EMBASE databases were searched up to May 2013 to identify controlled studies on the cleaning efficacy of mechanical instruments on contaminated titanium surfaces. RESULTS: A comprehensive search identified 1893 unique potential papers. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were selected for this systematic review. Most of the studies were in vitro studies. Different surfaces and different contamination methods were used. Most studies used titanium discs, strips and cylinders. The air abrasive was the treatment mostly evaluated. The available studies had a high heterogeneity that precluded any statistical analysis of the data. Therefore, the conclusions are not based on quantitative data. Non-metal curettes and rubber cups were found to be ineffective. Positive results were reported for (ultra)sonic scalers with a metal tip on polished surfaces, (ultra)sonic scalers with a non-metal tip on smooth and sand-blasted and acid-etched (SLA) surfaces, metal curettes and rotating titanium brushes on SLA surfaces. The air abrasive was found to be effective in cleaning machined, SLA and titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) surfaces. CONCLUSION: The available data suggest that the air abrasive may remove plaque effectively from machined, SLA and TPS titanium surfaces. Positive results were also observed for rotating titanium brushes on SLA surfaces and ultrasonic scalers with non-metal tip on polished and SLA surfaces. However, the clinical impact of these findings requires further clarification.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the ability of mechanical instruments to clean contaminated implant titanium surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane-CENTRAL and EMBASE databases were searched up to May 2013 to identify controlled studies on the cleaning efficacy of mechanical instruments on contaminated titanium surfaces. RESULTS: A comprehensive search identified 1893 unique potential papers. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were selected for this systematic review. Most of the studies were in vitro studies. Different surfaces and different contamination methods were used. Most studies used titanium discs, strips and cylinders. The air abrasive was the treatment mostly evaluated. The available studies had a high heterogeneity that precluded any statistical analysis of the data. Therefore, the conclusions are not based on quantitative data. Non-metal curettes and rubber cups were found to be ineffective. Positive results were reported for (ultra)sonic scalers with a metal tip on polished surfaces, (ultra)sonic scalers with a non-metal tip on smooth and sand-blasted and acid-etched (SLA) surfaces, metal curettes and rotating titanium brushes on SLA surfaces. The air abrasive was found to be effective in cleaning machined, SLA and titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) surfaces. CONCLUSION: The available data suggest that the air abrasive may remove plaque effectively from machined, SLA and TPS titanium surfaces. Positive results were also observed for rotating titanium brushes on SLA surfaces and ultrasonic scalers with non-metal tip on polished and SLA surfaces. However, the clinical impact of these findings requires further clarification.
Authors: Ralf Smeets; Anders Henningsen; Ole Jung; Max Heiland; Christian Hammächer; Jamal M Stein Journal: Head Face Med Date: 2014-09-03 Impact factor: 2.151
Authors: Diederik F M Hentenaar; Yvonne C M De Waal; Hans Strooker; Henny J A Meijer; Arie-Jan Van Winkelhoff; Gerry M Raghoebar Journal: Int J Implant Dent Date: 2017-07-17